Sepehr wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a problem when indexing documents with Solrj. I have a Java
> bean and when I try to index my object using addBean method, I get a
> bad request response from Solr, complaining with this message:
> "SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Document [null] mi
Your answers are here. Wiki describes it pretty well
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMaxRequestHandler
From: Sandhya Agarwal [via Lucene]
[mailto:ml-node+739071-961078546-124...@n3.nabble.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 9:40 PM
To: caman
Subject: dismax vs the standard query hand
Hello,
What are the advantages of using the “dismax” query handler vs the “standard”
query handler. As I understand, “dismax” queries are parsed differently and
provide more flexibility w.r.t score boosting etc. Do we have any more reasons ?
Thanks,
Sandhya
On 4/20/2010 9:09 PM, caman wrote:
Shawn,
Is this your custom implementation?
"For a delta-import, minDid comes from
the maxDid value stored after the last successful import."
Are you updating the dataTable after the import was successful? How did you
handle this? I have similar scenario and y
Hey Shawn,
Thanks for the tip. This will work nicely.
I totally missed the ability to use request parameters using
${dataimporter.request.* }
This way, I can maintain my own last_index_time timestamp outside of the
DIH properties file.
Much appreciation
Regards,
Michael
On 21/04/10 09
Shawn,
Is this your custom implementation?
"For a delta-import, minDid comes from
the maxDid value stored after the last successful import.
"
Are you updating the dataTable after the import was successful? How did you
handle this? I have similar scenario and your approach will work f
Please file a JIRA asking for the ability to direct what is saved in
the DIH properties file. It should be possible to use your own
timestamp or generated id.
On 4/20/10, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> Michael,
>
> The SolrEntityProcessor looks very intriguing, but it won't work with
> the released 1.4 ve
I'm trying to perform spell checking as part of a query using the Lucene
parser, and I'm finding that the spell checker is giving me suggestions for
the mathematical functions used in my boost clause. Here's my request as
seen through solr admin:
true
xml
5
*,score
0
: > If order is more important here, then it should have been a NamedList.
Yeah ... i think this is one of those cases where we were too overzealous
with SimpleOrderedMap
: I need to parse through this list with javascript so would like to set the
: output to an array if possible?
it's not pos
Michael,
The SolrEntityProcessor looks very intriguing, but it won't work with
the released 1.4 version. If that's OK with you and it looks like it'll
do what you want, feel free to ignore the rest of this.
I'm also using MySQL as an import source for Solr. I was unable to use
the last_ind
How does one do this? UpdateHandler doesn't override the init method
like SearchHandler.
I'll take another look and see if it makes sense to have the index and
query time parameters the same or different.
As far as the initial issue, I think you're right Tom, it is hitting on
both. I think what threw me off was the highlighting -- in one of my
matching documents, the term "I-CAR" is h
I never said they weren't.
Bill
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Abdelhamid ABID wrote:
> Which are JEE Web components, aren't they?
>
> On 4/20/10, Bill Au wrote:
> >
> > Solr only uses Servlet and JSP.
> >
> >
> > Bill
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Abdelhamid ABID
> > wrote:
Which are JEE Web components, aren't they?
On 4/20/10, Bill Au wrote:
>
> Solr only uses Servlet and JSP.
>
>
> Bill
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Abdelhamid ABID
> wrote:
>
> > Solr does use JEE WEB components
> >
> > On 4/17/10, Lukáš Vlček wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > may be y
Solr only uses Servlet and JSP.
Bill
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Abdelhamid ABID wrote:
> Solr does use JEE WEB components
>
> On 4/17/10, Lukáš Vlček wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > may be you should be aware that JBoss AS is using Tomcat for web
> container
> > (with modified classloader), s
http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/cores?action=CREATE&name=temp&instanceDir=
where is the solr_home/home/core
The core is created fine but no directory shows for the new core name "temp"
Ankit
--
View this message in context:
http://n3.nabble.com/Solr-Core-Creation-tp733159p73334
http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2010/01/21/the-seven-deadly-sins-of-solr/
Regards,
Gert.
From: MitchK [mailto:mitc...@web.de]
Sent: Mon 4/19/2010 7:06 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Big problem with solr in an official server.
Wasn't th
What was the command executed?
From: abhatna...@vantage.com [via Lucene]
[mailto:ml-node+733159-1790924601-124...@n3.nabble.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 11:58 AM
To: caman
Subject: Solr Core Creation
I tried creating a core on the fly using remote server
-I am able to query ag
I agree that, if they are the same, you want to merge them.
In this case, I don't think you want them to be the same. In particular, you
usually don't want to catenateWords and catenateNumbers both index time AND
at query time. You generate the permutations on one, or the other, but you
don't need
I hear this sort of complaint frequently.
Make ensure you did not forget to send a commit request after deleting any
documents you have removed.
Until the commit request is made those deletes are not yet finalized and the
removed documents will still show up
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Mitc
I tried creating a core on the fly using remote server
-I am able to query against it however it didn't create any new folder
inside solr home
is this the expected behavior?
I tried searching for this topic but couldn't found any good answer.
-Ankit
--
View this message in context:
http://
Hi All,
I have a problem when indexing documents with Solrj. I have a Java
bean and when I try to index my object using addBean method, I get a
bad request response from Solr, complaining with this message:
"SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Document [null] missing
required field: id".
Hi Isaac,
how did you implement pagination in Solr? What did you do there?
Did you ever had a look at your index with q=*:*?
Maybe you've forgotten to delete some news while testing your application
and so there are some duplicates.
Another thing is: If you have got only 20 news and Solr seems t
I found what I believe is a better option even if the multiplication
would work - FROM_UNIXTIME. That returns the same kind of output as you
get from an actual database date field.
On 4/20/2010 12:07 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
So, if I have my database multiply my value by 1000, I can put that
d
It has nothing to do with your problem, since it seems to work when Tom
tested it.
However, it seems like you are using the same configurations on query- and
index-type analyzer.
If you did not hide anything from (for example own filter-implementations),
because you don't want to confuse us, you c
When I run it, with that fieldType, it seems to work for me. Here's a sample
query output
0
17
on
0
xtext:I-Car
2.2
10
ALLCAPS
I-CAR
CAMEL
I-Car
Did I miss something?
Could you show the output with debugQuery=on for the user's failing query?
Assuming I
So, if I have my database multiply my value by 1000, I can put that
directly into a tdate field and it'll work as expected?
If that's the case, I think I might be able to modify my query from
"SELECT *" to "SELECT *,post_date*1000 as pdate" and add the pdate field
to the schema as type tdate.
I've got an odd scenario with a query a user's running. The user is
searching for the term "I-Car". It will hit if the document contains the
term "I-CAR" (all caps) but not if it's "I-Car". When I throw the terms
into the analysis page, the resulting tokens look identical, and my
"I-Car" tokens hi
That's a fine thing to do, that's what parentheses are for
Erick
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 1:16 AM, Sandhya Agarwal wrote:
> Thanks Erick. Using parentheses works.
>
> With parentheses, the query,q=field1: (this is a good string) is parsed as
> follows :
>
> +field1:this +field1:good +field1:
Hi everybody:
I have a big problem with pagination using apache solr and haystack, this is
what it is happening: I have a site where the news are being indexing with
haystack and solr, but the problem is that when a I make the search the
pagination is showing me more match results that what really
> I tried that and got the following result. Do I have to do
> anything other
> than the mentioned instructions to make it work?
>
> HTTP ERROR: 500
>
> tried to access field
> org.apache.lucene.queryParser.QueryParser.field from
> class
> org.apache.lucene.queryParser.ComplexPhraseQueryParser$C
Nice site. Really!
In addition to Dave:
How do I search with tags enabled?
If I search for "Blog", I can see that there's one blog software written
in Java. When I click on the Java tag, then my search is discarded, and
I get all Java software. when I do my search again, the tag filter is
lost. It
First impressions, nice site - some feedback:
1) It would be good if the tags in the central column were real facets rather
than search tags, i.e. they changed depending on my search or selection and
drilled down to filter results out.
2) It would be good if users could also review and rate the
Hello all,
We have launched a new site hosting the best open source products and
libraries across all categories. This site is powered by Solr search. There
are many open source products available in all categories and it is
sometimes difficult to identify which is the best. We identify the best.
I tried that and got the following result. Do I have to do anything other
than the mentioned instructions to make it work?
HTTP ERROR: 500
tried to access field org.apache.lucene.queryParser.QueryParser.field from
class
org.apache.lucene.queryParser.ComplexPhraseQueryParser$ComplexPhraseQuery
j
35 matches
Mail list logo