Nope! Lucene is committed to maintaining the order of values added to
a field, but does not have this feature.
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Blargy wrote:
>
> Is there anyway to facet on a multi-valued field at a particular index?
>
> For example, I have a field category_ids which is multi-valu
This is how http://www.lucidimagination.com/search works.
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Mark Bennett wrote:
>> A while back I had asked about the proper behavior when combining fulltext
>> search with Tags or Faceted filtering. Generally f
Log everything to SLF? SLF & Log4j include a key/value pair map for
each logging event. This is perfect for storing the fields, and log4j
has a thing that writes raw logging event objects to a target server:
http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/apidocs/org/apache/log4j/net/SocketServer.html
All yo
Is there anyway to facet on a multi-valued field at a particular index?
For example, I have a field category_ids which is multi-valued containing
category ids. The first value in that field is always the root category and
I would like to be able to facet on just that one field. Is this possible
w
Nice!
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Brendan Grainger
wrote:
> For what it's worth, it's also really easy to implement your own
> EntityProcessor. Extend from EntityProcessorBase then implement the getNext
> method to return a Map representing the row you want indexed.
> I did exactly this so
Since the facet "cache" is hard-allocated and has not eviction policy,
you could do a facet query on each core as part of the wam-up. This
way, the facets will not fail. At that point, you can tune the Solr
cache sizes.
Solr caches documents, searches, and filter queries. Filter queries
are sets
Yes... gotta jive with schema.xml though.
Erik
On Apr 8, 2010, at 7:18 PM, Tommy Chheng wrote:
If i build an index with solr, is it possible to use the index
folder with lucene?
--
Tommy Chheng
Programmer and UC Irvine Graduate Student
Twitter @tommychheng
http://tommy.chheng.com
Is there any way to configure autocommit to expungeDeletes? Looking at the code
it seems to be that there isn't...
>From org.apache.solr.update.DirectUpdateHandler2:
public synchronized void run() {
long started = System.currentTimeMillis();
try {
CommitUpdateCommand command =
: I found elevate query working fine with dismax handler when i added the
: searchComponent to my Dismax RH.
:
: Couldn't find the desired results when trying with the standard
: RequestHandler. Hope it works just like that with the Standard RH also.
did you add it to the declaration for your st
Not yet I've been stuck trying to figure out what the hell is happening with
my delta-imports:
http://n3.nabble.com/Need-help-with-StackOverflowError-td704451.html#a704451
--
View this message in context:
http://n3.nabble.com/MoreLikeThis-function-queries-tp692377p707308.html
Sent from the Solr
: Are function queries possible using the MLT request handler? How about using
: the _val_ hack? Thanks for your help
Did you try it?
The MoreLikeThisHandler uses the same parsing logic to build it's initial
query as the SearchHandler, so you can use whatever parsers you want
(including the "{
If i build an index with solr, is it possible to use the index folder
with lucene?
--
Tommy Chheng
Programmer and UC Irvine Graduate Student
Twitter @tommychheng
http://tommy.chheng.com
: However, I got some doubts on this: What about queries that should be
: filtered with the WordDelimiterFilter. This could make a large difference to
: a none-delimiter-filtered MAX_LEN *and* it has got a protwords param. I
: can't instantiate a new WordDelimiterFilter everytime I do a query, so
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Mark Bennett wrote:
> A while back I had asked about the proper behavior when combining fulltext
> search with Tags or Faceted filtering. Generally folks agree that
> Tags/Facets should further filter search search results. The search text
> should be "sticky" whe
A while back I had asked about the proper behavior when combining fulltext
search with Tags or Faceted filtering. Generally folks agree that
Tags/Facets should further filter search search results. The search text
should be "sticky" when facets are clicked.
The issue was whether selected Tag or
Hi all,
I was wondering whether any of you know any good tutorials online
describing how to develop a custom filter plugin. I have been trying
to create a latitude/longitude bounding box filter using two
NumericRangeFilters in a ChainedFilter object to no avail. No
documents are returned by getDoc
If anyone is curious, I've created a patch that creates a variant of
map that can be used in the way indicated below. See
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1871
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Chris Harris wrote:
> Option 1. Use map
>
> The most obvious way to do this would be to wrap th
: I'm having a problem with this idea. It seems that what you include with
: XInclude can only be a single XML element, not "big chunks" as I had hoped.
: If you have more than one, it dies. It took running it through xmllint to
: figure out why, the Solr exception was not informative. This wil
Also, If i remove my deletedPkQuery on the root entity the delta-import will
complete successfully. Does anyone have any idea how a deletedPkQuery would
end up in this circular StackOverflowError?
FYI.
I have a logical model called "item" and whenever an item gets deleted it
gets moved over to t
Kallin,
It's a very rare report, and practically impossible I'm told, to
corrupt the index these days thanks to Lucene's improvements over the
last several releases (ignoring hardware malfunctions).
A single index is the best way to go, in my opinion - though at your
scale you're probably
Hi everyone,
I've been doing work evaluating Solr for use on a hightraffic website for
sometime and things are looking positive. I have some concerns from my
higher-ups that I need to address. I have suggested that we use a single index
in order to keep things simple, but there are suggestions
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 7:10 PM, Lance Norskog wrote:
>> Since min(a,b) == -1*max(-1*a, -1*b), you could rewrite the previous
>> expression using this more complicated logic and it would work. But
>> that's ugly.
>>
>> Also, it would crash anyway. It looks like max currently requires one
>> of its
And there's an open issue where this sort of feature can be
contributed: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-903
Though in that issue there are a two different approaches mentioned,
one being purely SolrJ client-side (my original intention in opening
the issue), but also what Mark m
Thanks, that'll keep me from running down the wrong path
Erick
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
> right, its fixed only in the "new trunk":
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/trunk/
>
> nothing has been changed with regards to the solr 1.5 branch yet.
>
> On Thu
Thanks Mark. That's sort of what I was thinking of doing.
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
> On 04/08/2010 09:23 AM, Rich Cariens wrote:
>
>> Are there any best practices or built-in support for keeping track of
>> what's
>> been indexed in a Solr application so as to support
right, its fixed only in the "new trunk":
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/trunk/
nothing has been changed with regards to the solr 1.5 branch yet.
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Your're right, it sure looks related. But according to that JIRA, it's
> fixed
>
I'm not all that familiar with the underlying issues, but of the two I'd
pick moving the WordDelimiterFactory rather than setting increments =
"false".
But that's at least partly a guess
Best
Erick
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Demian Katz wrote:
> Thanks for looking into this -- I appre
Thanks for looking into this -- I appreciate the help (and feel a little better
that there seems to be a bug at work here and not just my total
incomprehension).
Sorry for any confusion over the UnicodeNormalizationFactory -- that's actually
a plug-in from the SolrMarc project (http://code.goog
On 04/08/2010 09:23 AM, Rich Cariens wrote:
Are there any best practices or built-in support for keeping track of what's
been indexed in a Solr application so as to support a full rebuild? I'm not
indexing from a single source, but from many, sometimes arbitrary, sources
including:
1. A doc
Thank you Alexey.
--
View this message in context:
http://n3.nabble.com/Short-Question-Fills-this-entity-multiValued-Fields-DIH-tp703245p706111.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
We can't help with the information you've provided. Please review:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists
Best
Erick
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Pooja Verlani wrote:
> Hi,
> In our search engine, we are getting numFound to be "0" for some queries
> where documents actually exist and a
As a follow up for anyone that is watching..
I changed from post via 100,000 separate posts in python -> stream with the
java client (not sure if its xml or csv behind the scenes), and my time to send
the data dropped from 340 seconds to 88 seconds.
May try and figure out a better streaming
Your're right, it sure looks related. But according to that JIRA, it's
fixed
in trunk and I'm pretty sure I have a very recent version that I built from
code I updated within the last few days.
I'll update tonight and double check. If it's still a problem I'll see if
I can write a test case illust
For what it's worth, it's also really easy to implement your own
EntityProcessor. Extend from EntityProcessorBase then implement the getNext
method to return a Map representing the row you want indexed. I
did exactly this so I could use reuse my hibernate domain models to query for
the data ins
Are there any best practices or built-in support for keeping track of what's
been indexed in a Solr application so as to support a full rebuild? I'm not
indexing from a single source, but from many, sometimes arbitrary, sources
including:
1. A document repository that fires events (containing
On 4/7/2010 9:26 PM, bbarani wrote:
Hi,
I am currently using DIH to index the data from a database. I am just trying
to figure out if there are any other open source tools which I can use just
for indexing purpose and use SOLR for querying.
I also thought of writing a custom code for retrieving
On 4/8/2010 7:05 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
Here's what I'm using as the query in my latest config:
Actually, that was three separate queries:
query="SELECT * FROM ${dataimporter.request.dataTable} WHERE did >
${dataimporter.request.minDid} AND did <=
${dataimporter.request.maxDid} AND (did %
On 4/8/2010 2:11 AM, Mark N wrote:
Is it possible to use solr DataImportHandler when that database fields are
not fixed ? As per my findings we need to configure which table ( entity)
we will read the data and must match which fields in database will map to
fields in solr schema
Since in my cas
Commented the following line in org.apache.lucene.search.SortField
return comparatorSource.newComparator(field, numHits, sortPos, reverse);
and added the following line temporarily.
return new FieldComparator.DoubleComparator(numHits, field, parser);
Changed geo_distance type to double from sdoub
Erick, this sounds like https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1852
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Well, for a quick trial using trunk, I had to remove the
> UnicodeNormalizationFactory, is that yours?
>
> But with that removed, I get the results you do, ASSUMING tha
I faced the same problem when i used locallucene 1.5 and localsolr 1.5.
Now I am using localsolr 2.0 and locallucene 2.0 and I dont see that issue.
You need to upgrade the binaries.
--
View this message in context:
http://n3.nabble.com/Spatial-Local-Solr-radius-tp487813p705744.html
Sent from the
I get the same error when I try to sort the result by geo_distance.
I am using Solr 1.4 (Nov 2009 release), lucene 2.9.1 and localsolr 2.0.
Thank you very much for your support.
Here is the stacktrace...
SEVERE: java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.apache.lucene.search.SortField.getCompa
Hi,
In our search engine, we are getting numFound to be "0" for some queries
where documents actually exist and also they are returned too. It randomly
sometimes returns numfound="0". Does any one has an idea what can be the
possible reason for the same?
Regards,
Pooja
Thanks it worked... with some innovations of my own. :)
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Markus Jelsma wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> It's simpler than you might think :)
>
> ?q=*:*&facet=true&facet.field=buzzWord&rows=0
>
> This will retrieve an overall facet count (useful for navigation and tag
> cloud
> g
I noticed now that the OutOfMemory exception occurs upon faceting queries.
Queries without facets do return successfully.
There are two log types upon the exception. The queries causing them differ
only in q parameter, the faceting and sorting parameters are the same. I
guess this has something to
Hello,
we would like to invite everyone interested in data storage, analysis and
search
to join us for two days on June 7/8th in Berlin for an in-depth, technical,
developer-focused conference located in the heart of Europe. Presentations will
range from beginner friendly introductions on the
> Have a look at these two lines:
>
>
>
>
>
> If there is more than one description per item_ID, does the features-field
> gets multiple values if it is defined as multiValued=true?
Correct.
Hi,
It's simpler than you might think :)
?q=*:*&facet=true&facet.field=buzzWord&rows=0
This will retrieve an overall facet count (useful for navigation and tag cloud
generation) but doesn't return the documents themselves. Check the facetting
wiki [1] for more information.
[1]: http://wiki
Hi Markus,
But the problem is, we donot know the words before hand. What will be the
facet Query be?
If you can just explain me with an example it would be really nice of you.
Regards,
Ninad R
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Markus Jelsma wrote:
> The facetting engine can do this job.
>
>
>
>
The facetting engine can do this job.
On Thursday 08 April 2010 10:16:09 Ninad Raut wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a business use case where in I have to generate a tagcloud for words
> with freequency greater than a specified threshold.
>
> The way I store records in solr is :
> For every solr docum
Hi,
I have a business use case where in I have to generate a tagcloud for words
with freequency greater than a specified threshold.
The way I store records in solr is :
For every solr document (which includes content) I store mutlivalued entry
of buzzwords with their frequency.
The technical pr
Is it possible to use solr DataImportHandler when that database fields are
not fixed ? As per my findings we need to configure which table ( entity)
we will read the data and must match which fields in database will map to
fields in solr schema
Since in my case database fields could be dynamic ,
Hello, there -
How often in Solr used possibility to store index in separate files for
different things, for example, products (at the one Solr instance)? The aim
is maintain separate files for backup, independent re-indexing, something
else(?). And in what extent useful that solutions? Thanks
Se
The queries do require sorting (on int) and faceting. They should fetch
first 200 docs.
The current problematic core has 10 entries in fieldCache and 5 entries in
filterCache. The other caches are empty. Is there any way to know how much
memory specific cache takes?
The problem is that one core b
54 matches
Mail list logo
