jmap output help

2010-03-27 Thread Siddhant Goel
Hi everyone, The output of "jmap -histo:live 27959 | head -30" is something like the following : num #instances #bytes class name -- 1:448441 180299464 [C 2: 5311 135734480 [I 3: 3623 683

Re: Solr 1.4 bug? search fails but analyzer indicates a match

2010-03-27 Thread Peter Wolanin
t;> here, or is this a bug? >> >> -Peter >> >> >> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Peter Wolanin >> wrote: >>> The output on the analysis screen does look correct. Here are 2 screen >>> shots: >>> >>> empty stopwords: >>

Re: Solr 1.4 bug? search fails but analyzer indicates a match

2010-03-27 Thread Peter Wolanin
ncorrect to have that directive > here, or is this a bug? > > -Peter > > > On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Peter Wolanin > wrote: >> The output on the analysis screen does look correct. Here are 2 screen shots: >> >> empty stopwords: >> http://img.skitch.

Re: Solr 1.4 bug? search fails but analyzer indicates a match

2010-03-27 Thread Peter Wolanin
ct to have that directive here, or is this a bug? -Peter On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Peter Wolanin wrote: > The output on the analysis screen does look correct. Here are 2 screen shots: > > empty stopwords: http://img.skitch.com/20100327-rcsjdih4bn3y8ahajqa5wjwybd.png > > s

Re: Solr 1.4 bug? search fails but analyzer indicates a match

2010-03-27 Thread Peter Wolanin
The output on the analysis screen does look correct. Here are 2 screen shots: empty stopwords: http://img.skitch.com/20100327-rcsjdih4bn3y8ahajqa5wjwybd.png standard stopwords: http://img.skitch.com/20100327-1w5ct1wr25jkir4sji8kumefn1.png -Peter On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 4:13 PM, MitchK wrote

Re: Solr 1.4 bug? search fails but analyzer indicates a match

2010-03-27 Thread MitchK
Peter, if you are right, please outcomment the stopword filter to make clear, that the problem is really a problem of how the stopword filter deletes stopwords. Is the output correct, if you enter "would be great to have support for Identi.ca on the follow block" in the query-label at the analys

Re: Solr 1.4 bug? search fails but analyzer indicates a match

2010-03-27 Thread Peter Wolanin
If I empty the stopword file and re-index, all expected matches happen. So maybe that provides a further suggestion of where the problem is. This certainly feels like a Solr bug (or lucene bug?). -Peter On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Peter Wolanin wrote: > Hi Mitch, > > I am also seeing this

Re: Solr 1.4 bug? search fails but analyzer indicates a match

2010-03-27 Thread Peter Wolanin
Hi Mitch, I am also seeing this locally with the exact same solr.war, solrconfig.xml, and schema.xml running under Jetty, as well as on 2 different production servers with the same content indexed. So this is really weird - this seems to be influenced by the surrounding text: "would be great to

Re: get synonyms

2010-03-27 Thread MitchK
Have a look at the example-folder of your Solr-environment. There is a config-directory, where you can find a "Synonyms.txt"-example-file. Try to understand why it looks like it looks and add those synonyms you may need for your usecase. What synonyms you want to use depends on the things you wan

Re: Solr 1.4 bug? search fails but analyzer indicates a match

2010-03-27 Thread MitchK
Hi Peter, have you tried to reindex your data and did you do a commit? If you changed anything, have you restarted your Solr-server? I can't understand why this problem occurs, since the example seem to work at analysis.jsp. Kind regards - Mitch -- View this message in context: http://n3.nabb

Re: ReplicationHandler reports incorrect replication failures

2010-03-27 Thread Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ्
please create a bug On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Shawn Smith wrote: > We're using Solr 1.4 Java replication, which seems to be working > nicely.  While writing production monitors to check that replication > is healthy, I think we've run into a bug in the status reporting of > the "../solr/re

Re: expungeDeletes on commit in Dataimport

2010-03-27 Thread Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ्
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Ruben Chadien wrote: > Hi > > I know this has been discussed before, but is there any way do > expungeDeletes=true when the DataImportHandler does the commit. expungeDeletes= true is not used does not mean that the doc does not get deleted.deleteDocByQuery does

Re: DIH best pratices question

2010-03-27 Thread Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ्
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 3:25 AM, Blargy wrote: > > I have a items table on db1 and and item_descriptions table on db2. > > The items table is very small in the sense that it has small columns while > the item_descriptions table has a very large text field column. Both tables > are around 7 million

Re: SolrJ and HTMLStripCharFilterFactory

2010-03-27 Thread Indika Tantrigoda
Hi Erick, Thank you very much for the explanation. The example you gave made things clear. I ran some queries with my existing index and the results were as expected. Regards, Indika On 27 March 2010 17:09, Erick Erickson wrote: > I think you're getting confused by the difference between inde

Solr 1.4 bug? search fails but analyzer indicates a match

2010-03-27 Thread Peter Wolanin
-1 Screen shots: analysis: http://img.skitch.com/20100327-nt1uc1ctykgny28n8bgu99h923.png dismax search: http://img.skitch.com/20100327-byiduuiry78caka7q5smsw7fp.png dismax search: http://img.skitch.com/20100327-gckm8uhjx3t7px31ygfqc2ugdq.png standard search: http://img.skitch.com/20100327-us

Re: SolrJ and HTMLStripCharFilterFactory

2010-03-27 Thread Erick Erickson
I think you're getting confused by the difference between indexing and storing. These are orthogonal operations for all they occur in the same definition. When you index something, the input is put through your analyzer chain, and the resulting tokens are stored after all appropriate transformatio

How to use Payloads with Solr?

2010-03-27 Thread MitchK
Hello community, since I have searched for a solution to get TermPositions in Solr, I became more aware of the "payload"-features. So I decided to learn more about payloads. In the wiki, there is not much said about them, so I will ask here at the mailing-list. It seems like Payloads are some

Re: solr-user@lucene.apache.org

2010-03-27 Thread MitchK
Excuse me again... it seems like my mail-provider has changed something. I hope this message won't pend again. Thank you. -- View this message in context: http://n3.nabble.com/solr-user-lucene-apache-org-tp679673p679684.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

solr-user@lucene.apache.org

2010-03-27 Thread Mitch Köhler
The 3rd turn... -- GMX.at - Österreichs FreeMail-Dienst mit über 2 Mio Mitgliedern E-Mail, SMS & mehr! Kostenlos: http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/atfreemail