Hi list,
is this true, no downloaded copy of the documentprocessor
anywhere available?
Regards,
Bernd
Bernd Fehling schrieb:
> Was anyone able to get a copy of:
> http://sesat.no/svn/sesat-documentprocessor/
>
> Unfortunately it is offline.
>
> Would be pleased to get a copy.
>
> Regards,
>
Hi,
I want to modify Similarity class for my app like the following-
Right now tf is Math.sqrt(termFrequency)
I would like to modify it to
Math.sqrt(termFrequncy/solrDoc.getFieldValue("count"))
where count is one of the fields in the particular solr document.
Is it possible to do so? Can I import s
Error messages that make sense. I have to read the source far too
often when a simple change to errror-handling would make some feature
easy to use. If I want to read Java I'll use Lucene!
Passive-aggressive error handling is a related problem: when I do
something nonsensical I too often get "0 re
Hi,
I understand if I query on a multivalued field, length norm takes the total
length of the multivalued field.
Is it possible to use the length of only the particular value in the array
of multivalued field? It would be easier and more efficient in searching
then.
Regards,
Pooja
Ha! http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-282
You're running this on a headless machine and the RTF parser demands
an X window.
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Bill Engle wrote:
> Any RTF file I tried to index in Solr 1.4 throws these errors out. I have
> no issues with doc, pdf. Any th
It may be easier to understand the problem if you create views for the
full- and delta-import queries.
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 9:09 AM, JavaGuy84 wrote:
>
> Hi,My data config looks like below,
> query="select * from z where id=x.id">I am able to successfully run the
> Full-Import query
There could be a common 'open an url' utility method. This would help
make the DIH components consistent.
2010/2/24 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् :
> you are right. The StreamSource class is not throwing the proper exception
>
> Do we really have to handle this.?
>
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 9:06 AM,
Hi everyone,
Last night I was able to get solr up and running. Ran and was able to
access:
http://localhost:8983/solr/admin
This morning, I started on the nutch crawling instructions over at:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/03/09/nutch-solr/
After adding the following to /solr/con
Jan,
If you go to Solr Admin Analysis page and enter your problematic query, what do
you see?
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Hadoop ecosystem search :: http://search-hadoop.com/
- Original Message
> From: Jan Simon Winkelmann
> To: "solr-user@lu
It depends on many factors - how big those docs are (compare a tweet to a news
article to a book chapter) whether you store the data or just index it, whether
you compress it, how and how much you analyze the data, etc.
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Hadoop e
Hi,
There is nothing wrong with using the same query for both events. As a matter
of fact, it makes sense to use the same (type of) query for both events.
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Hadoop ecosystem search :: http://search-hadoop.com/
- Original M
Yonk, can you please advise whether this event will be recorded and available
for later download? (It starts 5am our time ;-) )
Regards
Bern
-Original Message-
From: ysee...@gmail.com [mailto:ysee...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Yonik Seeley
Sent: Thursday, 25 February 2010 10:23 AM
To: solr
I thought I tried that, but I guess I didn't restart Solr to pick up the
configuration. That did the trick.
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Nagelberg, Kallin [mailto:knagelb...@globeandmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 1:10 PM
To: 'solr-user@lucene.apache.org'
Subject: RE:
Not that I'm aware of.
2010/2/25 Tim Terlegård
> 2010/2/25 Bradford Stephens :
> > Thanks for coming, everyone! We had around 25 people. A *huge*
> > success, for Seattle. And a big thanks to 10gen for sending Richard.
> >
> > Can't wait to see you all next month.
>
> Did anyone record the event
Try setting the boost to 0 for the fields you don't want to contribute to the
score.
Kallin Nagelberg
-Original Message-
From: Jason Chaffee [mailto:jchaf...@ebates.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 4:03 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: How to use dismax and boosting pro
We are currently using a commerical indexing product based on Lucene for
our indexing needs, and would like to replace it with SOLR. The source
database for this system has 40 million records, growing by about 30,000
items per day. It is a repository for all the metadata relating to an
archive
Can you elaborate on "doesn't work" when you put it in the /search handler?
You get an error in the logs? Nothing happens?
On 02/25/2010 03:47 PM, Jeffrey Zhao wrote:
Hi Mark,
Thanks for your reply. I did make a new handler as following, but it does
not work, anything wrong with my configurati
I am using dismax and I have configured to search 3 different fields
with one field getting an extra boost so that I the results of that
field are at the top of result set. Then, I sort the results by another
field to get the ordering.
My problem is that the scores are being skewed by the addi
1. Spatial search
2. Ease of managing a sharded index, multi-server Solr instance.
I am aware these are in-progress, slated for Solr 1.5.
I may find myself getting involved on these shortly because I'm working on a
very large scale search project requiring both.
~ David
On Feb 24, 2010, at 8:4
Hi Mark,
Thanks for your reply. I did make a new handler as following, but it does
not work, anything wrong with my configuration?
Thanks,
name="shards">202.161.196.189:8080/solr,localhost:8080/solr
query
facet
spellcheck
deb
On 02/25/2010 03:32 PM, Jeffrey Zhao wrote:
How do define a new search handler with a shards parameter? I defined as
following way but it doesn't work. If I put the shards parameter in
default handler, it seems I got an infinite loop.
explicit
How do define a new search handler with a shards parameter? I defined as
following way but it doesn't work. If I put the shards parameter in
default handler, it seems I got an infinite loop.
explicit
202.161.196.189:8080/solr,localhost:8080/solr
Erik Hatcher wrote:
> Ron - I think SOLR-792 meets the need you describe. What do you think?
> It's "tree faceting", allowing you to facet down 2 levels deep
> arbitrarily on any two fields. Ideally we'd enhance it to be of
> arbitrary depth too.
Nice! It certainly handles my main use case.
Th
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Dan Trainor wrote:
>
> Right now, being inexperienced with JMX and all, I was wondering if there
> was a way to pull all Solr-specific items out of there. I see some general
> counters pertaining to each of my Solr instances, but nothing along the
> lines of loo
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1750 might help you, since I don't
think that all of stats.jsp is exposed via MBeans. I could be wrong about that
though.. (apologies, our solr servers are firewalled and I can't connect via
JMX at the moment)
Thanks for your time!
Matthew Runo
Softwa
Any RTF file I tried to index in Solr 1.4 throws these errors out. I have
no issues with doc, pdf. Any thoughts? Thanks.
Apache Tomcat/6.0.18 - Error report