We're modeling hyperlocal news articles. Each article is indexed with a
shape that corresponds to the region of the map that is covered by the
source of the article. We considered modeling the locality of the articles
as points, but that approach would have limited our search options to
bounding
any ideas ???
adeelmahmood wrote:
>
> hi there
> I am having some trouble understanding delta import and how its different
> from full import .. from what I can tell the only difference is that it
> has the clean parameter set to false by default .. otherwise as far as
> setting up your query t
All,
Various books and online documentation states that the uniqueKey is not
required and we do not have a need for a unique key so i tried remove it
from the schema or setting it with no value but solr will not start with it
defined.
I do have an integer value that will be unique to each documen
If stemming is the underlying issue here, then are there any suggestions?
Would I have to remove the SnowballPorterFilterFactory from both the index
AND the query?
Just to clarify, the ability to search on "foos" and return "foo" (and
vice-versa) is quite important, but this other issue with wild
porter stemmer turns 'international' into 'intern'
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 6:57 PM, cjkadakia wrote:
>
> I'm getting very odd behavior from a wildcard search.
>
> For example, when I'm searching for docs with a name containing the word
> "International" the following occur:
>
> q=name:(inte*) --
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Jay Hill wrote:
> It's just that, in a
> running system, it's probably very rare that there is only a single segment
> for any meaningful length of time.
Right - but the performance impact of a huge merge can be non-trivial.
People wishing to avoid the biggest of
: All sorting of facets works great at the field level (count/index)...all good
: there...but how is sorting accomplished with range queries? The solrj
: response doesn't seem to maintain the order the queries are sent in, and the
The facet_queries section of the facet_counts is in the order that
Several things:
> You're including a stemmer in your field, that'll
transform your indexed terms.
> Have you used the schema browser in the admin
page to take a look at the results of indexing with
stemming? Luke is also good for this.
> What shows up when you add "&debugQuery=true"
to your search
I'm getting very odd behavior from a wildcard search.
For example, when I'm searching for docs with a name containing the word
"International" the following occur:
q=name:(inte*) -- found "International"
q=name:(intern*) -- found "International"
q=name:(interna*) -- did not find "International"
Thanks for clearing that up guys, I misspoke slightly. It's just that, in a
running system, it's probably very rare that there is only a single segment
for any meaningful length of time. Unless that merge-down-to-one occurs
right when indexing stops there will almost always be a new (small) segment
On Feb 20, 2010, at 8:53 AM, Asif Rahman wrote:
> One piece of functionality that I need is the ability to index a spatial
> shape. I've begun implementing this for solr 1.4 using just the spatial
> capabilities in lucene with a custom update processor and query parser. At
> this point I'm only
Thanks for the prompt reply
i added the parameter
0.7
to my config and this seems to take care of it.
Works which are present very close to the misspelled words seems to come
back now.
darniz
Markus Jelsma - Buyways B.V. wrote:
>
> darniz said:
>>
>> Hello All
>> Please reply to this ASAP
>>
Thanks Robert, that helped.
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 5:48 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
> i gave it a rough shot Lance, if there's a better way to explain it, please
> edit
>
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Lance Norskog wrote:
>
>> That would be great. After reading this and the PositionFilter clas
More precisely, remnant terms from deleted documents slowly disappear
as you add new documents or when you optimize the index.
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:09 AM, darniz wrote:
>
> Thanks
> If this is really the case, i declared a new filed called mySpellTextDup and
> retired the original field.
>
There are several component libraries for UIMA on the net:
http://incubator.apache.org/uima/external-resources.html
2010/2/18 José Moreira :
> have you used UIMA? i did a quick read on the docs and it seems to do what
> i'm looking for.
>
> 2010/2/11 Otis Gospodnetic
>
>> Note that UIMA doesn't d
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ConceptsAndDefinitions
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 7:13 AM, Raimon Bosch wrote:
>
>
> I am not an expert in lucene scoring formula, but omintNorms=false makes the
> scoring formula a little bit more complex, taking into account boosting for
> fields and documents. I
darniz said:
>
> Hello All
> Please reply to this ASAP
> I am using indexbasedSpellchecker right now i copy only model, and make
> names and some other fields to my spellcheck field.
> Hence my spell check field consists of only 120 words.
>
> The issue is if i type hond i get back honda which is f
Also, a mergefactor of 1 is actually invalid - 2 is the lowest you can go.
--
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com
Hello All
Please reply to this ASAP
I am using indexbasedSpellchecker right now i copy only model, and make
names and some other fields to my spellcheck field.
Hence my spell check field consists of only 120 words.
The issue is if i type hond i get back honda which is fine. But when i type
term
Hello All
Please reply to this ASAP
I am using indexbasedSpellchecker right now i copy only model, and make
names and some other fields to my spellcheck field.
Hence my spell check field consists of only 120 words.
The issue is if i type hond i get back honda which is fine. But when i type
term
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 2:20 PM, David Smiley @MITRE.org
wrote:
> I've always thought that these two events were effectively equivalent. --
> the results of an optimize vs the results of Lucene _naturally_ merging all
> segments together into one.
Correct. Occasionally one hit's a "major" merge
Your response contradicts the wiki's description of mergeFactor:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPerformanceFactors#mergeFactor
-- which clearly states that the indexes are merged into a single segment.
It makes no reference to "optimize" to trigger this condition. If what you
say is true, and w
Hi,
I am facing a performace issue when I am trying to index the data using
DIH.. I have a model as below
Tables
Object
ObjectProperty
ObjectRelationship
Object --> ObjectProperty one to Many Relationship
Object --> ObjectRelationship one to Many Relationship
We need to get
With a mergeFactor set to anything > 1 you would never have only one segment
- unless you optimized. So Lucene will never naturally merge all the
segments into one. Unless, I suppose, the mergeFactor was set to 1, but I've
never tested that. It's hard to picture how that would work.
If I understan
>>and a ramBufferSize of 3GB
If you had actually used great than 2GB of it, you would have seen problems
as an int overflowed -
which is why its now hard limited -
if (mb > 2048.0) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("ramBufferSize " + mb + " is too
large; should be comfortably less t
Set the "tie" parameter to 1.0. This param is set between 0.0 (pure
disjunction maximum) and 1.0 (pure disjunction sum):
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMaxRequestHandler#tie_.28Tie_breaker.29
-Jay
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 4:24 AM, bharath venkatesh <
bharathv6.proj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi ,
>
Looks like multi-threaded support was added to the DIH recently:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1352
-Jay
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <
otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Glen may be referring to LuSql indexing with multiple threads?
> Does/can DIH do that, to
hi there
I am having some trouble understanding delta import and how its different
from full import .. from what I can tell the only difference is that it has
the clean parameter set to false by default .. otherwise as far as setting
up your query to use the data_import_last_index_time .. you can
Hello,
this field would not be searched, but it would be used to display results.
A query could be :
q=table&hl=true&hl.fl=htmlfield&hl.fragsize=0
It would be tokenized with the HTMLStripStandardTokenizerFactory, then
analyzed the same way as the searcheable fields.
Could this result in hig
Hi,
Does "open for public" mean end users through browser or web sites through API?
In either case you should have a front end proxying the traffic through to
Solr, which explicitly allows only parameters that you allow.
--
Jan Høydahl - search architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
On 17.
You need to apply the patch to the source then compile the source. Applying
the patch can be done in any modern IDE, but it may take some poking. In
Eclipse, bring up the context menu on the project, team>>apply patch.
Or you can use the patch command directly (install svn first), see
http://wiki.
You're right!
I was as simple (stupid!) as that,
Thanks a lot (for your time .. very appreciated)
Roland
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: noble.p...@gmail.com [mailto:noble.p...@gmail.com] På vegne af Noble Paul
??? ??
Sendt: 22. februar 2010 14:01
Til: solr-user@lucene.apache.
Ranveer,
there's many ways on Windows as well.
An easy way is provided in IntelliJ IDEA's support for subversion.
There must be a similar one by Eclipse.
And of course, there's the gang of command-line tools provided by
Cygwin.
paul
On 22-févr.-10, at 15:15, Ranveer Kumar wrote:
Hi All,
Hi All,
I have no idea about "How to run patch?"
I am using windows os and I need to patch
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12407047/SOLR-1139.patch
Currently I download solr 1.4 and using.
Should I need to download source code and compiled. or can patch jar
(compiled) file directl
Shalin, yeah. i guess in my opinion, the diacritics handling in conjunction
with a stemmer is unfortunately not very easy to do, without getting wierd
results.
for example, the snowball stemmers usually expect these diacritics to be
there, they are looking for something closer to the proper "dicti
The xslt file looks fine . is the location of the file correct ?
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Roland Villemoes
wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> (thanks a lot)
>
> Yes, The full stacktrace is this:
>
> 22-02-2010 08:37:00 org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImporter
> doFullImport
> SEVERE: Full Import
I wasn't suggesting that they should be changed but trying to understand
why. This makes sense. Thanks Erik and Robert.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
> right, most stemmers expect the diacritics to be in their input to work
> correctly, too.
>
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 5:19
Hi,
What is the recommended pattern for securing a multicore solr instance,
accessed by different applications ? In our case, we need to prevent
application A from accessing the core of application B. Also, we need to
avoid the use of username/password authentication wherever possible. I have
read
Hello ,
I have explored ranking formula. As far as I understand, it
seems query-boost value is used only in "queryNorm" (to be exact : in
"sumOfSquaredWeights" ) that too inversely.
queryNorm(q) = queryNorm(sumOfSquaredWeights)=
1
––
sumOfSquaredWeights½
Hi
(thanks a lot)
Yes, The full stacktrace is this:
22-02-2010 08:37:00 org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImporter doFullImport
SEVERE: Full Import failed
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHandlerException: Error
initializing XSL Processing Document # 1
at
org.apache
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Roland Villemoes
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have to load data for Solr from a UrlDataSource supplying me with a XML
> feed.
>
> In the simple case where I just do simple XSLT select this works just fine.
> Just as shown on the wiki (http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportH
41 matches
Mail list logo
