In
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/
the wiki tab and "Docs (wiki)" hyper text in the side bar text after expansion
are the link to
http://wiki.apache.org/solr
But the wiki site seems to be broken. The above link took me to a generic help
page of the Wiki system.
What's going on? Did I just hit t
Minutello, Nick wrote:
>
> Maybe spend some time playing with Compass rather than speculating ;)
>
I spent few weeks by studying Compass source code, it was three years ago,
and Compass docs (3 years ago) were saying the same as now:
"Compass::Core provides support for two phase commits transa
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 8:03 PM, brad anderson wrote:
> I'm trying to create a faster index generator for testing purposes. Using
> lucene has helped immensely to increase indexing speed.
Have you tried using other indexing methods such as CSV or
StreamingUpdateSolrServer?
If there are any perfor
Greetings,
I'm trying to create a faster index generator for testing purposes. Using
lucene has helped immensely to increase indexing speed. However, my schema
includes a TrieDateField. I do not know how to correctly index this field
type using Lucene's API's.
I've tried the following:
new DateFi
Greetings,
I'm in the Bay Area doing startup-stuff this week, so Nick Dimiduk
will be running this meetup again. You can reach him at
ndimi...@gmail.com and 614-657-0267
A friendly reminder that the Seattle Hadoop, NoSQL, etc. meetup is on
January 27th at University of Washington in the Allen Com
Hi,
I swapped our indexing process over to the streaming update server, but now I'm
seeing places where our indexing code adds several documents, but eventually
hangs. It hangs just before the completion message, which comes directly after
sending to solr. I found this issue in jira
https://is
Hi,
I've run into this issue that I have no way of resolving, since the analysis
tool doesn't show me there is an error. I copy the exact field value into
the analysis tool and i type in the exact query request i'm issuing and the
tool finds it a match. However running the query with that exact s
Hi,
I am trying to work out how to store, query and facet machine tags [1]
in Solr using a combination of copy fields and pattern tokenizer factories.
I am still relatively new to Solr so despite feeling like I've gone over
the docs, and friends, it's entirely possible I've missed something
Thanks Erik, I did not know about the order guarantee for indexed
multivalue fields.
Timothy, it could be more than one term matches the queries.
Highlighting will show you which terms matched your query. You'll have
to post-process the results.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:26 AM, Harsch, Timothy J.
---
> What not use separate facet query for each these?
> &facet.query:[NOW-1DAY TO
> NOW]&facet.query:[NOW-7DAYS TO NOW]& etc.
Sorry I forgot to add the field name:
&facet.query=LastMod:[NOW-1DAY TO NOW]&facet.query=LastMod:[NOW-7DAYS TO NOW]&
> If I wanted to return documents faceted by LastMod and I
> wanted them grouped
> by week what would the correct syntax be?
>
> I would like to eventually format the results to display
> this:
>
> Last day (facet count)
> Last Week (facet count)
> Last 2 Weeks (facet count)
> Last Month (facet c
If I wanted to return documents faceted by LastMod and I wanted them grouped
by week what would the correct syntax be?
I would like to eventually format the results to display this:
Last day (facet count)
Last Week (facet count)
Last 2 Weeks (facet count)
Last Month (facet count)
Last 2 Months (
The problem is that negative queries are ignored by Lucene. Why this
is still true I have no idea.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 6:23 AM, Noam G. wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> Thank you very much - that did the trick :-)
>
> Noam.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/Delete-by-query
There does not seem to be on mentioned in the Wiki or the source. You
can do this with Javascript code in the DIH configuration, or by
setting the default in the schema.xml file.
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 12:20 PM, David Stuart
wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> Can anyone tell me what the attribute name is for
Correct. Its not 2PC. It just makes the window for inconistancy quite
small ... without the user having to write anything.
-N
-Original Message-
From: Lukas Kahwe Smith [mailto:m...@pooteeweet.org]
Sent: 25 January 2010 21:19
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr vs. Comp
Maybe spend some time playing with Compass rather than speculating ;)
If it helps, on the project where I last used compass, we had what I
consider to be a small dataset - just a few million documents. Nothing
related to indexing/searching took more than a second or 2 - mostly it
was 10's or 100's
Hello Frank,
Answers are inline:
Frank van Lingen said:
> I recently started working with solr and find it easy to setup and
> tinker with.
>
> I now want to scale up my setup and was wondering if there is an
> application/component that can do the following (I was not able to find
> documentatio
On 25.01.2010, at 22:16, Minutello, Nick wrote:
> Sorry, you have completely lost me :/
>
> In simple terms, there are times when you want the primary storage
> (database) and the Lucene index to be in synch - and updated atomically.
> It all depends on the kind of application.
Sure. I guess L
Sorry, you have completely lost me :/
In simple terms, there are times when you want the primary storage
(database) and the Lucene index to be in synch - and updated atomically.
It all depends on the kind of application.
-N
-Original Message-
From: Fuad Efendi [mailto:f...@efendi.ca]
I think you might be looking for Apache Tika.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Frank van Lingen wrote:
> I recently started working with solr and find it easy to setup and tinker
> with.
>
> I now want to scale up my setup and was wondering if there is an
> application/component that can do the
I am getting this exception as well, but disk space is not my problem. What
else can I do to debug this? The solr log doesn't appear to lend any other
clues..
Jan 25, 2010 4:02:22 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore execute
INFO: [] webapp=/solr path=/update params={} status=500 QTime=1990
Jan 25, 20
Is there any somewhat convenient way to collate/integrate fields from
separate indices during result writing, if the indices use the same
unique keys? Basically, some sort of cross-index JOIN?
As a bit of background, I have a rather heavyweight dataset of every US
business (~25m records, an
I recently started working with solr and find it easy to setup and tinker with.
I now want to scale up my setup and was wondering if there is an
application/component that can do the following (I was not able to
find documentation on this on the solr site):
-Can I send solr an xml document with a
How much memory are you allocating for the JVM? And
are you sure the memory isn't just memory hanging
around available for GCing?
An interesting test would be to restrict your available memory
allowed to the JVM and see if you bumped up against
that
Here's a blog post from Mark Miller about
There are some approaches outlined here that might be of interest:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HierarchicalFaceting
On Jan 24, 2010, at 2:54 AM, Andy wrote:
I'd like to provide a hierarchical faceting functionality.
An example would be location drill down such as USA -> New Y
> I'm not sure, theoretically fields with a null value
> (php-side) should end
> up not having the field. But then again i don't think it's
> relevant just
> yet. What bugs me is that if I add the -puid:[* TO *], all
> results for
> puid:[0 TO *] disappear, even though I am using "OR".
- operator
> Hi ,
> I m trying to use wildcard keywords in my search term and
> filter term . but
> i didnt get any results.
> Searched a lot but could not find any lead .
> Can someone help me in this.
> i m using solr 1.2.0 and have few records indexed with
> vendorName value as
> Intel
>
> In solr admin
Hi,
I am fairly new to Solr and would like to use the DIH to pull rich text
files (pdfs, etc) from BLOB fields in my database.
There was a suggestion made to use the FieldReaderDataSource with the
recently commited TikaEntityProcessor. Has anyone accomplished this?
This is my configuratio
I have a slave that is pulling multiple cores from one master, and I'm very
frequently seeing cases where the slave is getting timeouts when fetching from
the master:
2010-01-25 11:00:22,819 [pool-3-thread-1] ERROR
org.apache.solr.handler.SnapPuller - Master at:
http://shredder:8080/solr/Filin
> >> Even if "commit" takes 20 minutes?
> I've never seen a commit take 20 minutes... (anything taking that long
> is broken, perhaps in concept)
"index merge" can take from few minutes to few hours. That's why nothing can
beat SOLR Master/Slave and sharding for huge datasets. And reopening of
I
Just indexing. If I shutdown Solr, memory usage goes down to 200MB.
I've searched the mailing lists, but most situations are with people
both searching and indexing. I was under the impression that indexing
shouldn't use up so much memory. I'm trying to figure out where all
the usage is
Markus Jelsma wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Is the list without clue or should i mail Lucid directly?
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
>> I have installed and reconfigured everything according to the readme
>> supplied with the recent LucidGaze release. Files have been written in the
>> gaze directory in SOLR_HOME but
> >> Why to embed "indexing" as a transaction dependency? Extremely weird
> idea.
> There is nothing weird about different use cases requiring different
> approaches
>
> If you're just thinking documents and text search ... then its less of
> an issue.
> If you have an online application where
Are you also searching on this machine or just indexing?
I'll assume your certain that it's SOLR that's eating memory,
as in you stop the process and your usage drops way down.
But if you search the user list for memory, you'll see this
kind of thing discussed a bunch of times, along with
suggest
I see! Thanks a lot Eric.
==
Hicham El Kasmi
Université Libre de Bruxelles - Libraries
Av. F.D. Roosevelt 50, CP 180
1050 BRUSSELS Belgium
Tel: + 32 2 650 25 30
Fax: + 32 2 650 23 91
==
-Message d'origine-
Hello everyone!
I have a question about indexing a large dataset in Solr and ram
usage. I am currently indexing about 160 gigabytes of data to a
dedicated indexing server. The data is constantly being fed to Solr,
24/7. The index grows as I prune away old data that is not needed, so
th
Well, stop doing that The error message is a bit misleading, and
was probably in response to the more-frequent error of tokenizing a field
then trying to sort on it.
The problem is that sorting on something with more than one token is
indeterminate. In this case, with more than one title is
Hi Eric,
Yes, we're indexing more than one title per document (document's title, the
title of the series or of the journal in which the document was published,
etc...).
Normally, each time we modified the SOLR config, we drop the old index and we
create a new one.
Thanks,
If a simple "no" is the answer I'd be glad if anyone could confirm.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Harsch, Timothy J. (ARC-TI)[PEROT SYSTEMS]
[mailto:timothy.j.har...@nasa.gov]
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 2:53 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: determine which value produc
Hi,
Is the list without clue or should i mail Lucid directly?
Cheers,
>I have installed and reconfigured everything according to the readme
> supplied with the recent LucidGaze release. Files have been written in the
> gaze directory in SOLR_HOME but the *.log.x.y files are all empty! The rrd
Hi David,
Thank you very much - that did the trick :-)
Noam.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Delete-by-query-tp27306968p27307336.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
solrServer.deleteByQuery("*:* AND
-version_uuid:e04534e2-28db-4420-a5f3-300477872c11");
Should do the trick.
-Original Message-
From: Noam G. [mailto:noam...@gmail.com]
Sent: 25 January 2010 13:58
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Delete by query
Hi,
I have an index with 3M doc
Are you sending in more than one title per document, by chance?
Have you changed your configuration without reindexing the entire
collection, possibly?
Erik
On Jan 25, 2010, at 8:32 AM, EL KASMI Hicham wrote:
Thanks Otis,
The long message was an attempt to be as detailed as possi
Hi,
I have an index with 3M docs.
Each doc has a field calld version_uuid.
I want to delete all docs that theire version_uuid is other
then 'e04534e2-28db-4420-a5f3-300477872c11' (for example :-))
This is the query I submit to the SolrServer object using the deleteByQuery
method:
"NOT version_
On Jan 22, 2010, at 12:39 PM, Harsch, Timothy J. (ARC-TI)[PEROT SYSTEMS] wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm trying to see if I can use termVectors for a use case I have.
> Essentially I want to know is: where in the indexed value does the query hit
> occur?
Solr doesn't currently have support for Span Querie
Hi ,
I m trying to use wildcard keywords in my search term and filter term . but
i didnt get any results.
Searched a lot but could not find any lead .
Can someone help me in this.
this is my schema.xml entries
and this is my field type definition for text field
Thanks Otis,
The long message was an attempt to be as detailed as possible, so that one
could understand our tests. I'm afraid the problem we wanted to describe didn't
really come through.
These are the relevant entries from our config:
=
> Are you indexing an empty value? Or not indexing a field at all?
> -field:[* TO *] will match documents that do not have the field at all.
I'm not sure, theoretically fields with a null value (php-side) should end
up not having the field. But then again i don't think it's relevant just
yet. Wha
Are you indexing an empty value? Or not indexing a field at all?
-field:[* TO *] will match documents that do not have the field at all.
Erik
On Jan 25, 2010, at 7:02 AM, Jan-Simon Winkelmann wrote:
Hi there,
i have a field defined in my schema as follows:
Valid values for the f
Hi there,
i have a field defined in my schema as follows:
Valid values for the fields are (in theory) any unsigned integer value. Also
the field can be empty.
My problem is, that if I have (puid:[0 TO *] OR -puid:[* TO *]) as filter
query i get 0 results, without the "-puid:[* TO *])" part i g
On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 08:38 -0800, Marc Sturlese wrote:
> Check out this patch witch solve the distributed IDF's problem:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1632
> I think it fixes what you are explaining. The price you pay is that there
> are 2 requests per shard. If I am not worng the f
>> Why to embed "indexing" as a transaction dependency? Extremely weird idea.
There is nothing weird about different use cases requiring different
approaches
If you're just thinking documents and text search ... then its less of an issue.
If you have an online application where the indexing
DIH is the DataImportHandler. Please consult the two URLs
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler
and
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandlerFaq
for further information.
Cheers,
Sven
--On Monday, January 25, 2010 11:33:59 AM +0200 Bogdan Vatkov
wrote:
Hi Amit,
What is D
Hi Amit,
What is DIH? (I am Solr newbie).
In the mean time I resolved my issue - it was very stupid one - on of the
files in my folder with XMLs (that I send to Solr with the SimplePostTool),
and actually the latest created one (so it got executed last each time I run
the folder), contaoned *:*..
Hi Kelly,
Did you succeed in using these patches? It seems I've got the same need as
you : be able to collapse all products variations (SKU) under a single line
(the product).
As I'm beginning today with the field collapse patch, I'm still looking for
the best solution for this need.
Maybe someo
55 matches
Mail list logo
