Re: Synonyms from Database

2010-01-10 Thread Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ्
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > Ravi, > > I think if your synonyms were in a DB, it would be trivial to periodically > dump them into a text file Solr expects.  You wouldn't want to hit the DB to > look up synonyms at query time... Why query time. Can it not be done at

Could not start SOLR issue

2010-01-10 Thread dipti khullar
Hi We are running master/slave Solr 1.3 version on production since about 5 months. Yesterday, we faced following issue on one of the slaves for the first time because of which we had to restart the slave. SEVERE: Could not start SOLR. Check solr/home property java.lang.RuntimeException: java.io

Re: Errant link on the wiki

2010-01-10 Thread Pradeep Pujari
Hi Jason, Which one is the MIT link? Can you please paste the url? Pradeep. On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Jason Rutherglen < jason.rutherg...@gmail.com> wrote: > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters/Kstem > > Which is a cool algo, however the MIT link is totally down..

Errant link on the wiki

2010-01-10 Thread Jason Rutherglen
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters/Kstem Which is a cool algo, however the MIT link is totally down... Is it up sometimes or is it discontinued in favor of the Lucid version (which is open source or not?)?

[PECL-DEV] [ANNOUNCEMENT] solr-0.9.9 (beta) Released

2010-01-10 Thread Israel Ekpo
The new PECL package solr-0.9.9 (beta) has been released at http://pecl.php.net/. Release notes - - Fixed Bug #17009 Creating two SolrQuery objects leads to wrong query value - Reset the buffer for the request data from the previous request in SolrClient - Added new internal static fun

Re: London Search Social - this Tuesday, 12th January

2010-01-10 Thread rob
On Sun 10/01/10 20:24 , Richard Marr wrote: > Hi all, > Apologies for the cross-post. If you're near London on Tuesday the > 12th Jan (i.e. this Tuesday) please come along and geek with us over > a > beer or two. All experience levels welcome, don't be scared. Details > on the Meetup page be

London Search Social - this Tuesday, 12th January

2010-01-10 Thread Richard Marr
Hi all, Apologies for the cross-post. If you're near London on Tuesday the 12th Jan (i.e. this Tuesday) please come along and geek with us over a beer or two. All experience levels welcome, don't be scared. Details on the Meetup page below... (please sign up on there if you're interested in subseq

Re: Understanding the query parser

2010-01-10 Thread Ahmet Arslan
> I am using Solr 1.3. > I have an index with a field called "name". It is of type > "text" > (unmodified, stock text field from solr). > > My query > field:foo-bar > is parsed as a phrase query > field:"foo bar" > > I was rather expecting it to be parsed as > field:(foo bar) > or > field:foo fi

Re: How to Split Index file.

2010-01-10 Thread Andrzej Bialecki
On 2010-01-10 01:55, Lance Norskog wrote: Make two copies of the index. In each copy, delete the records you do not want. Optimize. ... which is essentially what the MultiPassIndexSplitter does, only it avoids the initial copy (by deleting in the source index). -- Best regards, Andrzej Bial

Tokenizer question

2010-01-10 Thread rswart
Hi, This is probably an easy question. I am doing a simple query on postcode and house number. If the housenumber contains a minus sign like: q=PostCode:(1078 pw)+AND+HouseNumber:(39-43) the resulting parsed query contains a phrase query: +(PostCode:1078 PostCode:pw) +PhraseQuery(HouseNumber

Re: Searching Behavior Multi Word

2010-01-10 Thread Erik Hatcher
Give &debugQuery=true a try and see what each of those parse to. What are your dismax settings? And for the fields you're querying (pf/qf), what are their field types and analysis details? Erik On Jan 10, 2010, at 9:48 AM, brianeno wrote: Hello, I am having trouble figuring ou

Searching Behavior Multi Word

2010-01-10 Thread brianeno
Hello, I am having trouble figuring out an issue with Solr and returning of a query. I have a document title "Band Of Brothers" and seeing the following results. - “Band” = works, returns the document - “Brothers = works, returns the document - “Band of” = works, returns the document - “Band of