I was originally using POST for the same reason, however I discovered that
Tomcat could easily be configured to accept any length URI. All it requires
is specifying the maxHttpHeaderSize attribute in your default Connector in
server.xml. I set my value to 1MB, which is certainly excessive, but it
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : It seems like no, and should be an easy change. I'm putting newlines
> : after the commas so the large shards list doesn't scroll off the
> : screen.
>
> Yeah ... for some odd reason QueryComponnent is using
> StrUtils.splitSmart() ...
Hi,
i was trying to insert one million records in solr (keeping the id from
0 to 100). things were fine till it inserted (id = 523932). after that
it started inserting it from 1 (i.e updating). i am not able to understand
this behaviour. any pointers??
Regards,
Raakhi
We need to offer "begins with" type searches, e.g. a search for "surname, f"
will retrieve "surname, firstname", "surname, f", "surname fm" etc.
Ideally, the user would be able to enter something like "surname f*".
However, wildcards don't work on phrase searches, nor do range searches.
Any sug
After reading the explanation in the book, its very clear now. Thank you
citing it with page number,
Ram
hossman wrote:
>
>
> What you are looking at is an XML escaped version of this string...
>
> 2<-1 3<-2 6<100%
>
> ...the syntax is documented here...
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/s
I was able to reproduce the exact same stacktrace you have sent. The
exception occured when I removed a document from a newly created index
(with a commit) and then did a search with field collapsing enabled. I
have attached a new patch to SOLR-236 that includes a fix for this
bug.
Martijn
2009/1
What you are looking at is an XML escaped version of this string...
2<-1 3<-2 6<100%
...the syntax is documented here...
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMaxRequestHandler#mm_.28Minimum_.27Should.27_Match.29
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/api/org/apache/solr/util/doc-files/min-should-match
: Fair enough, I guess I was just kind of expecting a constant score query + a
: function query to result in a score of whatever the function query is. This
: is a common trick to sort by a function, but it's easy enough to just ^0 the
: non function clause.
I think the root of hte issue is that
: When I test it, if I test it with "stored=true", it works as expected, if I
: test with with "stored=false" the resultset is empty.
Adding stored="false" has no impact on anything related to searchings --
it only affects what values can be written out by the response writer.
There's no way on
: I need some help about the mergeindex command. I have 2 cores A and B
: that I want to merge into a new index RES. A has 100 docs and B 10
: docs. All of B's docs are from A, except that one attribute is
: changed. The goal is to bring the updated attributes from B into A.
that's not how mergei
Hi,
consider this minimum match params in dismax query handler,
2<-1 3<-2 6<100%
I requested solr to match atleast two fields, which i understood from the
documents. Can someone give me explanations for other params in it?
"lt;-1 3"
"lt;-2 6"
"lt;100%"
how are they si
Hi Stefan,
you don't need to convert the Java objects built from the result
returned as Javabin. Instead of this, you could easily use the JSON
return format by setting "wt=json". See also at [0] for more information
about this.
Patrick
[0] http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolJSON
SGE0 schrieb:
>
: Is there a way to specify an increment gap between tokens with the
: PatternTokenizerFactory or do I need to customise it? For instance if I
: split on commas in "*Books, Online Shopping, Book Store*" I want to be able
: to put a 100 position gap between say "books" and "online shopping".
Term
: I search to make a request in solr similaire are "SELECT COUNT(*) FROM
: InscriptionNew WHERE choices & 17 > 0;" into mysql.
: it is possible, you have an idea ?
bitmask operations in DB queries like that are usually a result of using a
single physical column to store many logical boolean colu
: It seems like no, and should be an easy change. I'm putting newlines
: after the commas so the large shards list doesn't scroll off the
: screen.
Yeah ... for some odd reason QueryComponnent is using
StrUtils.splitSmart() ... SolrPluginUtils.split() seems like a saner
choice.
A better quest
In the current code base the MLT Handler has geneerally been superceeded
by a MLT Component which may do what you want -- you can use an QParser
you want to generate a DocList and the MLT Component then suggests similar
docs for each doc in your list.
As i said: that may be what you're looking
: My objective is to be able to stored it as xhtml in the field and be
: able to retrieve it as cached output. Since tika is already giving xhtml
: output, I wonder why when Solr save it as a plain text. (Maybe I missed
: out something in the configuration??)
I'm not very familiar with Tika or
: http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/03/31/nested-queries-in-solr/).
: When working with Solr 1.3 stable, I'm able to use this syntax
: effectively using the default requestHandler, but when I am
: hand-rolling my own requestHandler, it doesn't recognize the _query_
the magic field _query_
Hi Joe,
Can you give a bit more context info? Like the exact search and the
field types you are using for example. Also are you doing a lot of
frequent updates to the index?
Cheers,
Martijn
2009/10/23 Joe Calderon :
> seems to happen when sort on anything besides strictly score, even
> score de
19 matches
Mail list logo