Hi,
I am new to solr. I have following queries :
1. Is solr work in distributed environment ? if yes, how to configure it?
2. Is solr have Hadoop support? if yes, how to setup it with Hadoop/HDFS?
(Note: I am familiar with Hadoop)
3. I have employee information(id, name ,
really?
I don't remember that being changed.
what difference do u notice?
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 2:30 AM, michael8 wrote:
>
> Just looking for confirmation from others, but it appears that the formatting
> of last_index_time from dataimport.properties (using DataImportHandler) is
> different in
Hello Mr.Hostetter,
Thank you for patiently reading through my post, I apologize for being
cryptic in my previous messages..
>>when you cut/pasted the facet output, you excluded the field names. based
>>on the schema & solrconfig.xml snippets you posted later, i'm assuming
>>they are usstate, and
hi Lance. db.blob is the correct field name so that is fine.
you can probbaly open an issue and provide the testcase as a patch.
That can help us track this better
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 12:45 AM, Lance Norskog wrote:
> A side note that might help: if I change the dataField from 'db.blob'
> to 'b
send a small sample xml snippet you are trying to index and it may help
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Adam Foltzer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to set up DataImportHandler to index some XML documents available
> over web services. The XML includes both content and metadata, so for the
> inde
Maybe I'm missing something, but function queries aren't involved in
determining whether a document matches or not, only its score. How is a a
custom function / value-source going to filter?
~ David Smiley
hossman wrote:
>
>
> : I read about this chapter before. It did not mention how to cre
Hello Yonik,
Thank you for looking into this. Your question of if I'm using stock
solr put me in the right direction. I am in fact using a patched
version of solr to get hierarchal facet support (http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-64
). I took out the 4 hiefacet fields from the schema
Hi David,
See this thread for how I use OR with Dismax.
http://www.mail-archive.com/solr-user@lucene.apache.org/msg19375.html
-- Dean
-Original Message-
From: Ingo Renner [mailto:i...@typo3.org]
Sent: 06 October 2009 05:00
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Need "OR" in DisMax
: I want to be able to have SOLR Slave instance on publicly available host
: (accessible via HTTP), and synchronize with Master securely (via HTTP)
HTTP based replication only works with the the new ReplicationHandler ...
if you setup a proxy in front of your Master (either as a seperate daemon,
: I would expect field:2001-03 to be a hit on a partial match such as
: field:[2001-02-28T00:00:00Z TO 2001-03-13T00:00:00Z]. I suppose that my
: expectation would be that field:2001-03 would be counted once per day for each
: day in its range. It would follow that a user looking for documents re
Nice. In comparison, how do you do it with faceting?
> "Two other approaches are to use either the TermsComponent (new in Solr
> 1.4) or faceting."
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:51 AM, Jay Hill wrote:
> Have a look at a blog I posted on how to use EdgeNGrams to build an
> auto-suggest tool:
>
> ht
A few comments about the info you've provided...
when you cut/pasted the facet output, you excluded the field names. based
on the schema & solrconfig.xml snippets you posted later, i'm assuming
they are usstate, and keyword, but you have to be explicit so that people can
help correlate the
r
: I read about this chapter before. It did not mention how to create my
: own customized function.
: Can you point me to some instructions?
The first step is to figure out how you can code your custom functionality
as an extension of the ValueSource class...
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/api/or
On 6 Oct 09, at 5:31 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
...your expectations may be different then everyone elses. by
requiring
that the dates be explicit there is no ambiguity, you are in control
of
the behavior.
The power of some of the other formulas in ISO 8601 is that you don't
introduce f
Thanks for making me think about this a little bit deeper, Hoss.
Comments in-line.
Chris Hostetter wrote:
because those would be ambiguous. if you just indexed field:2001-03 would
you expect it to match field:[2001-02-28T00:00:00Z TO
2001-03-13T00:00:00Z] ... what about date faceting, what s
: I ll try to explain with an example. Given the term 'it!' in the title, it
: should match both 'it' and 'it!' in the query as an exact match. Currently,
: this is done by using a synonym entry (and index time SynonymFilter) as
: follows:
:
: it! => it, it!
:
: Now, the above holds true for
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Nasseam Elkarra wrote:
> I had a dev build of 1.4 from 5/1/2009 and importing a 20K row took less
> than a minute. Updating to the latest as of yesterday, the import is really
> slow and I had to cancel it after a half hour. This prevented me from
> upgrading a few
: I tried to simplify the problem, but the point is that I could have
: really: complex requirements. For instance, "if in the first 5 results
: none are older than one year, use sort by X, otherwise sort by Y".
First 5 in what order? X? Y or something else?
: So, the question is, is there a
Got it. Sorry for not having an answer for your problem.
On 10/06/2009 04:58 PM, Ravi Kiran wrote:
You dont see any facet fields in my query because I have configured them in
the solrconfig.xml to give specific fields as facets by default in the
dismax and standard handlers so that I dont have t
You dont see any facet fields in my query because I have configured them in
the solrconfig.xml to give specific fields as facets by default in the
dismax and standard handlers so that I dont have to specify all those fields
individually everytime I query, all I need to do is just set facet=true
tha
: Sorry about asking this here, but I can't reach wiki.apache.org right now.
: What do I set in query.setMaxRows() to get all the rows?
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FAQ#How_can_I_get_ALL_the_matching_documents_back.3F_..._How_can_I_return_an_unlimited_number_of_rows.3F
How can I get ALL the mat
: When I was working on it, I was actually going to default to not show
: the size, and make you click a link that added a param to get the sizes
: in the display too. But I foolishly didn't bring it up when Hoss made my
: life easier with his simpler patch.
we can always turn the size estimator
I am stumped then. I had a similar issue when I was using a field that
was being heavily tokenized, but I corrected the issue by using a
field(generated using copyField) that doesn't get analyzed at all.
On the query you provided before I didn't see the parameters to tell
solr for which field
:My question is why isn't the DateField implementation of ISO 8601 broader
: so that it could include and MM as acceptable date strings? What
because those would be ambiguous. if you just indexed field:2001-03 would
you expect it to match field:[2001-02-28T00:00:00Z TO
2001-03-13
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 2:40 AM, Paul Rosen wrote:
> Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
>
> The path on the wiki page was wrong. You need to use the adminPath in the
>> url. Look at the adminPath attribute in solr.xml. It is typically
>> /admin/cores
>>
>> So the correct path for you would be:
>>
>>
>>
Mark Miller wrote:
> Jeff Newburn wrote:
>
>> So could that potentially explain our use of more ram on indexing? Or is
>> this a rare edge case.
>>
>>
> I think it could explain the JVM using more RAM while indexing - but it
> should be fairly easily recoverable from what I can tell - so
Hi Shalin,
Good question; sorry I forgot it in the initial post. I have tried with both
a nightly build from earlier this month (Oct 2 I believe) as well as a build
from the trunk as of yesterday afternoon.
Adam
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrot
Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
The path on the wiki page was wrong. You need to use the adminPath in the
url. Look at the adminPath attribute in solr.xml. It is typically
/admin/cores
So the correct path for you would be:
http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/cores?action=mergeindexes&core=merged&ind
Yes Exactly the same
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Christian Zambrano wrote:
> And you had the analyzer for that field set-up the same way as shown on
> your previous e-mail when you indexed the data?
>
>
>
>
> On 10/06/2009 03:46 PM, Ravi Kiran wrote:
>
>> I did infact check it out any there i
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Adam Foltzer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to set up DataImportHandler to index some XML documents
> available
> over web services. The XML includes both content and metadata, so for the
> indexable content, I'm trying to just index everything under the content
>
Just looking for confirmation from others, but it appears that the formatting
of last_index_time from dataimport.properties (using DataImportHandler) is
different in 1.4 vs. that in 1.3. I was troubleshooting why delta imports
are no longer working for me after moving over to solr 1.4 (10/2 nighl
And you had the analyzer for that field set-up the same way as shown on
your previous e-mail when you indexed the data?
On 10/06/2009 03:46 PM, Ravi Kiran wrote:
I did infact check it out any there is no weirdness in analysis page...see
result below
Index Analyzer org.apache.solr.analysis.Ke
thx much guys, no biggie for me, i just wanted to get to the bottom of
it in case i had screwed something else up..
--joe
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> I was worried about that actually. I havn't tested how fast the RAM
> estimator is on huge String FieldCaches - it will b
Yeah that's exactly right Mark.
What does the "maxCommitsToKeep"(from SolrDeletionPolicy in SolrConfig.xml)
parameter actually do? Increasing this value seems to have helped a little, but
I'm wary of cranking it without having a better understanding of what it does.
-Original Message-
F
I did infact check it out any there is no weirdness in analysis page...see
result below
Index Analyzer org.apache.solr.analysis.KeywordTokenizerFactory {} term
position 1 term text New York term type word source start,end 0,8 payload
org.apache.solr.analysis.TrimFilterFactory {} term position 1
It sounds like he is indexing on a local disk, but reading the files to
be index from NFS - which would be fine.
You can get Lucene indexes to work on NFS (though still not recommended)
, but you need to use a custom IndexDeletionPolicy to keep older commit
points around longer and be sure not to
I seem to recall hearing something about *not* putting a Solr index directory
on an NFS mount. Might want to search on that.
That, of course, doesn't have anything to do with commits showing up
unexpectedly in stack traces, per your original email.
-Todd
-Original Message-
From: Giovan
Have you tried using the Analysis page to see what tokens are generated
for the string "New York"? It could be one of the token filter is adding
the token 'new' for all strings that start with 'new'
On 10/06/2009 02:54 PM, Ravi Kiran wrote:
Hello All,
Iam getting some ghost face
I was worried about that actually. I havn't tested how fast the RAM
estimator is on huge String FieldCaches - it will be fast on everything
else, but it checks the size of each String in the array.
When I was working on it, I was actually going to default to not show
the size, and make you click a
Master-Slave replica: new caches will be warmed&prepopulated _before_ making
new IndexReader available for _new_ requests and _before_ discarding old one
- it means that theoretical sizing for FieldCache (which is defined by
number of docs in an index and cardinality of a field) should be doubled..
Might be the new Lucene fieldCache stats stuff that was recently added?
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Joe Calderon wrote:
> hello *, ive been noticing that /admin/stats.jsp is really slow in the
> recent builds, has anyone else encountered this?
>
>
> --
Jeff Newburn wrote:
> So could that potentially explain our use of more ram on indexing? Or is
> this a rare edge case.
>
I think it could explain the JVM using more RAM while indexing - but it
should be fairly easily recoverable from what I can tell - so no
explanation on the OOM yet. Still loo
hello *, ive been noticing that /admin/stats.jsp is really slow in the
recent builds, has anyone else encountered this?
--joe
Hello All,
Iam getting some ghost facets in solr 1.4. Can anybody kindly
help me understand why I get them and how to eliminate them. My schema.xml
snippet is given at the end. Iam indexing Named Entities extracted via
OpenNLP into solr. My understanding regarding KeywordTokenizerFact
So could that potentially explain our use of more ram on indexing? Or is
this a rare edge case.
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
> From: Mark Miller
> Reply-To:
> Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:30:50 -0400
> To:
> Subject: Re: Solr Trunk Heap Space I
That thread was blocking for an hour while all other threads were idle or
blocked.
-Original Message-
From: ysee...@gmail.com [mailto:ysee...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Yonik Seeley
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 3:07 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr Timeouts
This speci
Yeah this is Java 1.6.
The indexes are being written to a local disk, but they files being indexed
live on a NFS.
-Original Message-
From: Lance Norskog [mailto:goks...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 2:59 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr Timeouts
Is this
This is looking like its just a Lucene oddity you get when adding a
single doc due to some changes with the NRT stuff.
Mark Miller wrote:
> Okay - I'm sorry - serves me right for working sick.
>
> Now that I have put on my glasses and correctly tagged my two eclipse tests:
>
> It still appears tha
> I read pretty much all posts on this thread (before and after this one).
Looks
> like the main suggestion from you and others is to keep max heap size
(-Xmx)
> as small as possible (as long as you don't see OOM exception).
I suggested absolute opposite; please note also that "as small as possi
If you are looking for (simplified) ZIP/PostalCode -> Longitude-Latitude
mapping (North America) check this: http://www.zipcodedownload.com
I am using it for service area calculations for casaGURU renovation
professionals at http://www.casaguru.com
They even have API library (including stored pro
: Is it possible to narrow down what fields/field-types are causing the
problems?
: Or perhaps profile and see what's taking up time compared to the older
version?
Or: could you post your solrconfig + schema + csv files online so other
people could help debug the problem?
:
: -Yonik
: http:
A side note that might help: if I change the dataField from 'db.blob'
to 'blob', this DIH stack emits no documents.
On 10/5/09, Lance Norskog wrote:
> I've added a unit test for the problem down below. It feeds document
> field data into the XPathEntityProcessor via the
> FieldReaderDataSource, a
Lucene's test for multi-valued fields is crude... it's essentially if
the number of values (un-inverted term instances) becomes greater than
the number of documents.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 3:04 PM, wojtekpia wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm running Solr version 1.3.0
This specific thread was blocked for an hour?
If so, I'd echo Lance... this is a local disk right?
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Giovanni Fernandez-Kincade
wrote:
> I just grabbed another stack trace for a thread that has been similarly
> blocking for o
Hi,
I'm running Solr version 1.3.0.2009.07.08.08.05.45 in 2 environments. I have
a field defined as:
The two environments have different data, but both have single and multi
valued entries for myDate.
On one environment sorting by myDate works (sort seems to be by the 'last'
value if multi va
Is this Java 1.5? There are known threading bugs in 1.5 that were
fixed in Java 1.6. Also, there was one short series of 1.6 releases
that wrote bogus Lucene index files.
So, make sure you use the latest Java 1.6 release.
Also, I hope this is a local disk. Some shops try running over NFS or
Windo
Is it possible to narrow down what fields/field-types are causing the problems?
Or perhaps profile and see what's taking up time compared to the older version?
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Nasseam Elkarra wrote:
> Hello Erick,
>
> Sorry about that. I'm
Hi,
Can someone suggest me a good geo-coding service or software for commercial
use. I want to find gecodes for large collection of address. I'm looking for
a good long term service.
Thanks
Ram
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Geo-Coding-Service-tp25774277p25774277.html
Have a look at a blog I posted on how to use EdgeNGrams to build an
auto-suggest tool:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/09/08/auto-suggest-from-popular-queries-using-edgengrams/
You could easily add filter queries to this approach. Ffor example, the
query used in the blog could add filter
Hello Erick,
Sorry about that. I'm using the CSV update handler. Uploading a local
CSV using the stream.file parameter. There are 94 fields and 36
copyFields.
Thank you,
Nasseam
On Oct 6, 2009, at 10:09 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
Well, without some better idea of *how* you're doing the imp
Okay - I'm sorry - serves me right for working sick.
Now that I have put on my glasses and correctly tagged my two eclipse tests:
It still appears that trunk likes to use more RAM.
I switched both tests to one million iterations and watched the heap.
The test from the build around may 5th (I pr
Well, without some better idea of *how* you're doing the import, it's a
little hard to say anything meaningful (hint, hint).
Best
Erick
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Nasseam Elkarra wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I had a dev build of 1.4 from 5/1/2009 and importing a 20K row took less
> than a minute
Okay, I juggled the tests in eclipse and flipped the results. So they
make sense.
Sorry - goose chase on this one.
Yonik Seeley wrote:
> I don't see this with trunk... I just tried TestIndexingPerformance
> with 1M docs, and it seemed to work fine.
> Memory use stabilized at 40MB.
> Most memory u
I don't see this with trunk... I just tried TestIndexingPerformance
with 1M docs, and it seemed to work fine.
Memory use stabilized at 40MB.
Most memory use was for indexing (not analysis).
char[] topped out at 4.5MB
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Mark Mi
(Posted here, per Yonik's suggestion)
In the code I'm working with, I generate a cache of calculated values as
a by-product within a Filter.getDocidSet implementation (and within a
Query-ized version of the filter and its Scorer method) . These values
are keyed off the IndexReader's docID valu
Please try hl.usePhraseHighlighter=true parameter.
(It should be true by default if you use the latest nightly, but I think
you don't)
Koji
Antonio Calò wrote:
Hi Guys
I'm getting crazy with the highlighting in solr. The problem is the follow:
when I submit an exact phrase query, I get the r
Is it possible that deletions are triggering these commits? Some of the
documents that I'm making indexing requests for already exist in the index, so
they would result in deletions. I tried messing with some of these parameters
but I'm still running into the same problem:
false
Yeah - I was wondering about that ... not sure how these guys are
stacking up ...
Yonik Seeley wrote:
> TestIndexingPerformance?
> What the heck... that's not even multi-threaded!
>
> -Yonik
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
>
>> Darn
TestIndexingPerformance?
What the heck... that's not even multi-threaded!
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Darnit - didn't finish that email. This is after running your old short
> doc perf test for 10,000 iterations. You see the same
Darnit - didn't finish that email. This is after running your old short
doc perf test for 10,000 iterations. You see the same thing with 1000
iterations but much less pronounced eg gettin' worse with more iterations.
Mark Miller wrote:
> A little before and after. The before is around may 5th'is -
A little before and after. The before is around may 5th'is - the after
is trunk.
http://myhardshadow.com/memanalysis/before.png
http://myhardshadow.com/memanalysis/after.png
Mark Miller wrote:
> Took a peak at the checkout around the time he says he's using.
>
> CharTokenizer appears to be holdin
Hi,
I have a field. The field has a sentence. If the user types in a word
or a phrase, how can I return the index of this word or the index of
the first word of the phrase?
I tried to use &bf=ord..., but it does not work as i expected.
Thanks.
Elaine
Took a peak at the checkout around the time he says he's using.
CharTokenizer appears to be holding onto much large char[] arrays now
than before. Same with snowball.Among - used to be almost nothing, now
its largio.
The new TokenStream stuff appears to be clinging. Needs to find some
inner peace
Hi all,
I'm trying to set up DataImportHandler to index some XML documents available
over web services. The XML includes both content and metadata, so for the
indexable content, I'm trying to just index everything under the content
tag:
The result of this is that the title field gets populat
Hello,
Even short/partial answers could satisfy me :)
Nourredine.
>Hi,
>Can you please give me some answers for those questions :
>
>1 - How can I get synonyms found for a keyword ?
>
>I mean i search "foo" and i have in my synonyms.txt file the following tokens
>: "foo, foobar, fee" (w
Reverse alphabetical ordering. The option "index" provides
alphabetical ordering.
I have a year_facet field, that I would like to display in reverse order
(most recent years first). Perhaps there is some other way to
accomplish this.
Thanks.
--Gerald
Chris Hostetter wrote:
: Is there a
yeah that is missing.
I've just committed a setter/getter for dataDir in create command
do this
CoreAdminRequest.Create req = new CoreAdminRequest.Create();
req.setCoreName( name );
req.setInstanceDir(instanceDir);
req.setDataDirDir(dataDir);
return req.process( solrServer );
Hi there,
i want to create cores using SolrJ, but i also want to create then in a
given datadir. How can i do this? Looking CoreAdminRequest methods i only
found:
- createCore(name, instanceDir, server)
- createCore(name, instanceDir, server, configFile, schemaFile)
None of above methods
Any particular reason for the double quotes in the 2nd and 3rd query example,
but not the 1st, or is this just an artifact of your email?
-Todd
-Original Message-
From: Rakhi Khatwani [mailto:rkhatw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 2:26 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Su
Hi Elaine,
You can implement a function query in Solr in two ways:
1. Using Dismax request handler (with bf parameter).
2. Using the standard request handler (with _val_ field).
I recommend the first option.
Sandeep
Elaine Li wrote:
>
> Hi Sandeep,
>
> I read about this chapter before. It
I am attempting to optimize a large shard on solr 1.4 and repeatedly get
java.io.IOException: No space left on device. The shard, after a final
commit before optimize, shows a size of about 192GB on a 400GB volume.
I have successfully optimized 2 other shards that were similarly large
without
Hello,
What's the best way to get auto-suggested terms/keywords that is filtered by
one or more fields? TermsComponent should have been the solution but filters
are not supported.
Thanks,
Rihaed
Hi all,
from reading through previous posts on that subject, it seems like the
accent filter has to come before the snowball filter.
I'd just like to make sure this is so. If it is the case, I'm wondering
whether snowball filters for i.e. French process accented language
correctly, at all, or wh
You are right, Angel. The problem would still persist.
Why don't you consider putting the original data in some field. While
querying, you can query on both the fields - analyzed and original one.
Wildcard queries will not give you any results from the analyzed field but
would match the data in you
Hi,
i have an example in which i want to use a regular expression in my
solr query:
for example: suppose i wanna search on a sample :
raakhi rajnish ninad goureya sheetal
ritesh rajnish ninad goureya sheetal
where my content field is of type text
when i type in
QUERY: content:raa*
RESPONSE
Am 05.10.2009 um 20:36 schrieb David Giffin:
Hi David,
Maybe I'm missing something, but I can't seem to get the dismax
request handler to perform and OR query. It appears that OR is removed
by the stop words.
It's not the stop words, Dismax simply doesn't do any boolean
operations, the onl
Ah yes, got it.
But i'm not sure this will solve my problem.
Because, I'm aloso using the IsoLatin1 filter, that remove the accentued
characters.
So I will have the same problem with accentued characters. Cause the original
token is not stored with this filter.
Laurent
>
> I am defining a field:
>
>
indexed="false" and stored="false"? really? This field is as good as
nothing. What would you use it for?
Can I have a null for such a field?
>
Yes you can. Moreover, as you have sortMissingLast="true" specified in your
field type definition, documents having null va
You are processing your tokens in the filter that you wrote. I am assuming
it is the first filter being applied and removes the character 'h' from
tokens. When you are doing that, you can preserve the original token in the
same field as well. Because as of now, you are simply removing the
character
Hi.
Thanks for your answers Christian and Avlesh.
But I don't understant what you mean by :
"If you want to enable wildcard queries, preserving the original token (while
processing each token in your filter) might work."
Could you explain this point please ?
Laurent
__
Hi,
My fieldtype definition is like:
I am defining a field:
Can I have a null for such a field? or is there a way I can use it as a date
field only if the value is null. I cant put the field as a string type as I
have to apply recency sort and some filters for that field.
Regards,
Pooja
Hi,
i wanted to query solr and send the output some reporting tool. has
anyone done something like that? moreover, which reporting filter is good??
ny suggesstions?
Regards,
Raakhi
92 matches
Mail list logo
