Am I correct in thinking that trie fields don't support
sortMissingLast (my tests show that they don't). If not, is there any
plan for adding it in?
Regards,
Steve
You might want to see how the stats component works with field
collapsing.
Thanks,
Matt Weber
On Sep 30, 2009, at 5:16 PM, Uri Boness wrote:
Hi,
At the moment I think the most appropriate place to put it is in the
AbstractDocumentCollapser (in the getCollapseInfo method). Though,
it mi
> So, if we
> do a create, will it modify the solr.xml everytime? Can it be avoided in
> subsequent requests for create?
>
>
>No, solr.xml will be modified only if persist=true is passed as a request
>param. I don't understand your second question. Why would you want to issue
>create commands for
Hi,
At the moment I think the most appropriate place to put it is in the
AbstractDocumentCollapser (in the getCollapseInfo method). Though, it
might not be the most efficient.
Cheers,
Uri
Joe Calderon wrote:
hello all, i have a question on the field collapsing patch, say i have
an integer f
Joe Calderon wrote:
> how would i go about modifying the dismax parser to treat +/- as regular text?
>
Would be nice if there was a tiny simple method you could override for
this, but:
You should extend the dismax parser and override addMainQuery
Where it calls SolrPluginUtils.partialEscape, c
how would i go about modifying the dismax parser to treat +/- as regular text?
Excuse the cross-posting and gratuitous marketing :)
Erik
My company, Lucid Imagination, is sponsoring a free and in-depth
technical webinar with Erik Hatcher, one of our co-founders as Lucid
Imagination, as well as co-author of Lucene in Action, and Lucene/Solr
PMC member and com
Sorry, I should have given more background. We have, at the moment 3.8
million documents of 0.7MB/doc average so we have extremely large
shards. We build about 400,000 documents to a shard resulting
200GB/shard. We are also using LVM snapshots to manage a snapshot of
the shard which we serve
As Bradford is out of town this evening, I will take up the mantel of
Person-on-Point. Contact me with questions re: tonight's gathering.
See you tonight!
-Nick
614.657.0267
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Bradford Stephens <
bradfordsteph...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone!
> Don't forget
Hi,
I am working with a SaaS vendor who is integrated with Nutch 0.9 and SOLR. We
are looking for some help to migrate this to Nutch 1.0. The work involves:
1) We made changes to Nutch 0.9; these need to be ported to Nutch 1.0.
2) Configure SOLR integration with Nutch 1.0
3)
In order to make maximal use of our storage by avoiding the dead 2x
overhead needed to optimize the index we are considering setting
mergefactor=1 and living with the slow indexing performance which is not
a problem in our use case.
Some questions:
1) Does mergefactor=1 mean that the size o
hello all, i have a question on the field collapsing patch, say i have
an integer field called "num_in_stock" and i collapse by some other
column, is it possible to sum up that integer field and return the
total in the output, if not how would i go about extending the
collapsing component to suppor
See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldCollapsing
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Michael wrote:
> If I index a bunch of email documents, is there a way to say"show me all
> email documents, but only one per To: email address"
> so that if there are a total of 10 distinct To: fields in the corpus
If I index a bunch of email documents, is there a way to say"show me all
email documents, but only one per To: email address"
so that if there are a total of 10 distinct To: fields in the corpus, I get
back 10 email documents?
I'm aware of http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Deduplication but I want to re
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:24 PM, wrote:
> If I index the following text: "I live in Dublin Ireland where
> Guinness is brewed"
>
> Then search for: duvlin
>
> Should Solr return a match?
>
> In the admin interface under the analysis section, Solr highlights
> some NGram matches?
>
> When I enter
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:24 PM, wrote:
>
> Can someone please clarify what the purpose of the
> NGramFilter/tokenizer is, if not to allow for
> misspellings/morphological variation and also, what the correct
> configuration is in terms of use at index/query time.
>
>
If it is spellcheck you are
>Fergus McMenemie wrote:
>>> Fergus McMenemie wrote:
Hi all,
I am attempting to test some changes I made to my DIH based
indexing process. The changes only affect the way I
describe my fields in data-config.xml, there should be no
changes to the way the data is indexe
Has this issue been fixed yet? can anyone shed some light on what's
going on here please. NGramming is critical to my app. I will have to
look to something other than Solr if it's not possible to do :(
My understanding of a NGramTokenizing is to help with languages that don't
necessarily contain spaces as a word delimiter (Japanese et al). In that case
bi-gramming is used to find words contained within a stream of unbroken
characters. In that case, you want to find all of the bi-grams that you
Sönke Goldbeck wrote:
Alright, first post to this list and I hope the question
is not too stupid or misplaced ...
what I currently have:
- a nicely working Solr 1.3 index with information about some
entities e.g. organisations, indexed from an RDBMS. Many of these
entities have an URL pointing a
If I index the following text: "I live in Dublin Ireland where
Guinness is brewed"
Then search for: duvlin
Should Solr return a match?
In the admin interface under the analysis section, Solr highlights
some NGram matches?
When I enter the following query string into my browser address bar, I
ge
Alright, first post to this list and I hope the question
is not too stupid or misplaced ...
what I currently have:
- a nicely working Solr 1.3 index with information about some
entities e.g. organisations, indexed from an RDBMS. Many of these
entities have an URL pointing at further information,
I want to build a FunctionQuery that scores documents based on a multi-valued
field. My intention was to use the field cache, but that doesn't get me
multiple values per document. I saw other posts suggesting UnInvertedField
as the solution. I don't see a method in the UnInvertedField class that w
Hi,
Can you please give me some answers for those questions :
1 - How can I get synonyms found for a keyword ?
I mean i search "foo" and i have in my synonyms.txt file the following tokens :
"foo, foobar, fee" (with expand = true)
My index contains "foo" and "foobar". I want to display a
Solr is a server that runs on Java and it exposes a http interface.SolrNet
is a client library for .Net that connects to a Solr instance via its http
interface.
My experiment (let's call it SolrIKVM) is an attempt to run Solr on .Net.
Hope that clear things up.
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:50 AM, A
Solr is a separate service, in the same way a RDMS is a separate service.
Whether you install it on the same machine as your webserver or not,
it's logically separated from your server.
Jerome.
2009/9/30 Claudio Martella :
> Kevin Miller wrote:
>> Does Solr have to be installed on the web server
Thanks Matt!! I will take a look at the patch for field collapsing.
Thanks Marian for pointing that out. If the field collapse does not work
then I will have to rely on solr caching.
Thanks,
Varun Gupta
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 1:44 AM, Matt Weber wrote:
> So, you want to display 5 results fro
I guys, thanks for your prompt feedback.
So, you are saying that SolrNet is just a wrapper written in C#, that
connnect the Solr (still written in Java that run on the IKVM) ?
Is my understanding correct?
Regards
Antonio
2009/9/30 Mauricio Scheffer
> SolrNet is only a http client to Solr.
>
Kevin Miller wrote:
> Does Solr have to be installed on the web server, or can I install Solr
> on a different server and access it from my web server?
>
> Kevin Miller
> Web Services
>
>
you can access it from your webserver (or browser) via HTTP/XML requests
and responses.
have a look at solr
Does Solr have to be installed on the web server, or can I install Solr
on a different server and access it from my web server?
Kevin Miller
Web Services
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Jérôme Etévé wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've got my own query parser plugin defined thanks to the queryParser tag:
>
>
>
> The QParserPlugin class has got an init method like this:
> public void init(NamedList args);
>
> Where and how do I put my args to be passed to i
Hi,
- Try to let solr do the commits for you (setting up autocommit
feature). (and stop committing after inserting one document). This
should greatly improve the delays you're experiencing.
- If you do not optimize, it's normal your index size only grows.
Optimize once regularly when your load is
SolrNet is only a http client to Solr.
I've been experimenting with IKVM but wasn't very successful... There seem
to be some issues with class loading, but unfortunately I don't have much
time to continue these experiments right now. In case you're interested in
continuing this, here's the reposito
Hi all,
I've got my own query parser plugin defined thanks to the queryParser tag:
The QParserPlugin class has got an init method like this:
public void init(NamedList args);
Where and how do I put my args to be passed to init for my query parser plugin?
I'm trying
value1
value1
field:[* TO *] matches documents that have that have one or more terms
in that field. If your indexer is sending a value, it'll end up with
a term.
Note that changing from string to long requires reindexing, though
that isn't the issue here.
Erik
On Sep 30, 2009, at 2:39 AM,
thanks again for your immediate response
yes, i am running the commit after a document is indexed
here i don't understand why my index size is increased to 625MB(for the
10 documents)
which was previously 250MB
is this due to i have not optimized at all my index or since i am adding
documen
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Bill Dueber wrote:
>
>> Is this possible? I can't figure out a syntax that works, and all the
>> examples show using last_index_time as an argument to an SQL query.
>>
>>
>
Swapna
While the disk space does increase during the process of optimization,
it should almost always return to the original size or slightly less.
This is a silly question. But off the top of my head, I can't think of
any other reason why the index size would increase - Are you running a
after
thanks for your reply
i have not optimized at all
my knowledge is optimize improves the query performance but it will take
more disk space
except that i have no idea how to use it
previously for 10 documents the size occupied was around 250MB
But after 2 months it is 625MB
why this happened
Also, what is your merge factor set to?
Pravin
2009/9/30 Pravin Paratey :
> Swapna,
>
> Your answers are inline.
>
> 2009/9/30 swapna_here :
>>
>> hi all,
>>
>> I have indexed 10 documents (daily around 5000 documents will be indexed
>> one at a time to solr)
>> at the same time daily few(aro
You may want to check out - http://code.google.com/p/solrnet/
2009/9/30 Antonio Calò :
> Hi All
>
> I'm wondering if is already available a Solr version for .Net or if it is
> still under development/planning. I've searched on Solr website but I've
> found only info on Lucene .Net project.
>
> Bes
Hi All
I'm wondering if is already available a Solr version for .Net or if it is
still under development/planning. I've searched on Solr website but I've
found only info on Lucene .Net project.
Best Regards
Antonio
--
Antonio Calò
--
Software Developer E
Swapna,
Your answers are inline.
2009/9/30 swapna_here :
>
> hi all,
>
> I have indexed 10 documents (daily around 5000 documents will be indexed
> one at a time to solr)
> at the same time daily few(around 2000) indexed documents (added 30 days
> back) will be deleted using DeleteByQuery of
Hi, i'm not having the expected results when using [* TO *], the results are
including empty fields.
Here is my configuration:
schema.xml:
bean:
@Field
private List refFaseExp= new ArrayList();
query:
http://host.com/select?rows=0&facet=true&facet.field=refFaseExp&q=*:* AND
refFaseExp:[* TO *]
Hi all
I am getting incorrect results when i search with numbers only or string
containing numbers.
when such a search is done, all the results in the index is returned,
irrespective of the search key.
For eg, the phone number field is mapped to TextField. it can contains
values like , 653-23345
hossman wrote:
>
>
> : Hi all, I'm having problems getting Solr to start on Tomcat 6.
>
> which version of Solr?
>
>
Sorry -- a nightly build from about a month ago. Re. your other message, I
was sure the two machines had the same version on, but maybe not -- when I'm
back in the office tom
Fergus McMenemie wrote:
Fergus McMenemie wrote:
Hi all,
I am attempting to test some changes I made to my DIH based
indexing process. The changes only affect the way I
describe my fields in data-config.xml, there should be no
changes to the way the data is indexed or stored.
As a QA check I
>Fergus McMenemie wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am attempting to test some changes I made to my DIH based
>> indexing process. The changes only affect the way I
>> describe my fields in data-config.xml, there should be no
>> changes to the way the data is indexed or stored.
>>
>> As a QA check I wa
hi all,
I have indexed 10 documents (daily around 5000 documents will be indexed
one at a time to solr)
at the same time daily few(around 2000) indexed documents (added 30 days
back) will be deleted using DeleteByQuery of SolrJ
Previously each document used to be indexed within 5ms..
but rece
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 3:48 AM, djain101 wrote:
>
> Hi Shalin,
>
> Can you please elaborate, why we need to do unload after create?
No you don't need to. You can unload if you want to for some reasons.
> So, if we
> do a create, will it modify the solr.xml everytime? Can it be avoided in
> s
50 matches
Mail list logo
