Would appreciate any help on this. Thanks
Rahul
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Rahul R wrote:
> Hello,
> I have a few questions regarding the copyField directive in schema.xml
>
> 1. Does the destination field store a reference or the actual data ?
> If I have soemthing like this
>
> then wil
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 1:13 AM, kedardes wrote:
>
> Hi, I have a data-config file where I map the fields of a very simple table
> using dynamic field definitions :
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> It can import documents in certain other formats using the
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtractingRequestHandler
>
1) According to my inference.Solr uses Apache Tikka to convert other rich
document format files to Text Files, so that the Class ExtractRequestHandler
use the output text file
Hi,
1)Solr has various type of caches . We can specify how many documents cache
can have at a time.
e.g. if windowsize=50
50 results will be cached in queryResult Cache.
if user makes a new request to server for results after 50
documents a new request will be sent to
Are there supposed to be multiple parsedquery entries for a
distributed query when debugQuery=true?
: I would like to add an additional name:value pair for every line, mapping the
: sku field to my schema's id field:
:
: .map={sku.field}:{id}
the map param is for replacing a *value* with a different' value ... it's
useful for things like numeric codes in CSV files that you want to replace
wi
: Its 15th-November-2009. Its been a year since Solr 1.3 was released.
It's september actaully.
: Is there any expected approximate release date for Solr 1.4
there is no specific date, but the timeframe and what the release is
dependent on have been discussed in several threads...
http://wiki
: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery. Either that or roll it up into the
: document boost, but that loses some precision.
but if that's what you want to do then yes: solr can compute the
documenta boost on submission based on the field values ... *IF* if you
write an UpdateProcessor to
: Subject: documentation deficiency : case sensitivity of boolean operators
:
: I couldn't find this anywhere on solr's docs / faq
if you have suggestions on places to add it, feel free to update the wiki.
(most of the documentation is deliberatly agnostic to the specifics of the
query parser
That's already linked from
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrQuerySyntax
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
> I couldn't find this anywhere on solr's docs / faq
>
> i finally found a reference on lucene
> http://lucene.apache.org
I couldn't find this anywhere on solr's docs / faq
i finally found a reference on lucene
http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_4_0/queryparsersyntax.html
this should really be added somewhere. i'm not sure where, but I
thought this was worth bringing up to the list -- as it really
confuse
--- On Tue, 9/15/09, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
> From: Jonathan Vanasco
> Subject: faceted query not working as i expected
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Tuesday, September 15, 2009, 10:54 PM
> I'm trying to request documents that
> have "facet.venue_type" as "Private Collection"
>
>
: A large majority of users use single core ONLY. It is hard to explain
: them the need for an extra componentin the url.
A majority use only a single core because that's all they know because
it's what the default example and the tutorial use. Even when people
have no have use for running mul
I'm trying to request documents that have "facet.venue_type" as
"Private Collection"
Instead I'm also getting items where another field is marked
"Permanent Collection"
My schema has:
required="false" />
stored="true" required="false" />
My query is
q=*:*
qt=
Hi, I have a data-config file where I map the fields of a very simple table
using dynamic field definitions :
but when I run the dataimport I get this error:
WARNING: E
There are a few different ways to get data into Solr. XML is one way,
and probably the most common. As far as Solr is concerned it doesn't
matter whether you construct XML input by hand or write some kind of
code to do it. Solr won't automatically create any files like the
example .xml files for yo
: I just copied this information to the wiki at
: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRequestHandler
FYI: All of this info is specific to SearchComponents which are specific
to SearchHandler -- so that page is a missleading place to put this info
(plenty of other SearchHandlers don't support compon
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Insight 49, LLC wrote:
> Want to map each sku field to the schema unique id field using update/csv.
You can set the sku field to be the uniqueKey field in the schema. See
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml#head-bec9b4f189d7f493c42f99b479ed0a8d0dd3d76e
for more
Bump. Can anyone help guide me in the right direction?
Want to map each sku field to the schema unique id field using update/csv.
Thanks. Dan.
Insight 49, LLC wrote:
Using http://localhost:8983/solr/update/csv?stream.file, is there any
way to map one of the csv fields to one's schema unique i
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 1:14 PM, mike anderson wrote:
> Could this be related to SOLR-1423?
Nope, and I haven't been able to reproduce the bug you saw either.
-Yonik
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Yonik Seeley
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, I'll see if I can reproduce...
>>
>> -Yonik
>> http://www.
Hi Jerome,
5 seconds is too little using Solr 1.3 or 1.4 because of caching
and segment warming. If you turn off caching and segment
warming, then you may be able do 5s latency using either a
RAMDirectory or an SSD. In the future these issues will be fixed
and less than 1s will be possible.
-J
O
You can query multiple cores using MultiEmbeddedSearchHandler in
SOLR-1431. Then the facet counts will be merged just like the current
distributed requests.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 7:41 AM, Paul Rosen wrote:
> Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 2:39 AM, Paul Rosen
>> wrot
Could this be related to SOLR-1423?
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> Thanks, I'll see if I can reproduce...
>
> -Yonik
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 2:10 AM, mike anderson
> wrote:
> > Yeah.. that was weird. removing the line "forever,for eve
Its 15th-November-2009. Its been a year since Solr 1.3 was released.
Everyone is eagerly expecting that around this time Solr 1.4 will be
released.
(Refer Book: Solr 1.4 Enterprise Search Server, By David Smiley & Eric
Pugh, Page 11
"the latest official release. Solr 1.3 was released on Septembe
Hi,
You can enable/disable stemming per field type in the schema.xml, by
removing the stemming filters from the type definition.
Basically, copy your prefered type, rename it to something like
'text_nostem', remove the stemming filter from the type and use your
'text_nostem' type for your field
I have a field where there are items that are plurals, and used as very
specific locators, so i do a solr search type:articles, and it translates it
into : type:article, then into type:articl... is tehre a way to stop it from
doing this on either the field "type" or on a list of words "articles,
n
On Sep 14, 2009, at 2:06 PM, Mohamed Parvez wrote:
I am trying configure an request handler that will be uses in the Auto
Complete Query.
I am limiting the result to one field by using the "fl" parameter,
which can
be used to specify field to return.
How to make the field return only one w
Easy FIX: use autoReconnect=true for MySQL:
jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/?useUnicode=true&characterEncoding=UTF-8&autoReconnect=true
May be it will help; connection is auto-closed " after a couple of seconds"
(usually 10 seconds) by default, for MySQL... connection pooling won't help
(their JD
Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 2:39 AM, Paul Rosen wrote:
I've done a few experiments with searching two cores with the same schema
using the shard syntax. (using solr 1.3)
My use case is that I want to have multiple cores because a few different
people will be managing t
Hi all,
I am newbie to Solr.
I have downloaded and used the solr example and I have a basic doubt.
There are some xml documents present in
apache-solr-1.3.0\example\exampledocs.
These are the input files to solr index and I found that by giving this
command
java –jar post.jar *.xml
. All t
Hi,
I am familiar with Lucene and trying out Solr.
I have index which was created outside solr. The index is fairly
simple with two field - document_id & content. The query result needs
to return all the document IDs. The result need not be ordered by the
score. For this, in Lucene, I use custom
On Sep 15, 2009, at 5:31 AM, Licinio Fernández Maurelo wrote:
Hi there,
i want to recover the term vectors from indexes not calculating then
but
just only recovering instead.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/TermVectorComponent
Some questions about this topic:
1. When i put the optio
Hi all,
I've got a solr server under significant load ( ~40/s ) and a single
process which can potentially commit as often as possible.
Typically, when it commits every 5 or 10s, my solr server slows down
quite a lot and this can lead to congestion problems on my client
side.
What would you reco
Hi
I am a newbie to Solr. Right now I have to do a task of converting rich
documents to Solr readable index format so that I can use the index for
searching.
I learnt about Solr and got a rough idea of what has to be done.
Requirement 1:
1) I have to index the rich document format files like
Hi there,
i want to recover the term vectors from indexes not calculating then but
just only recovering instead.
Some questions about this topic:
1. When i put the option ... what's happening behind?
1. Is Lucene storing the tv in the index?
2. Is Lucene storing additional inf
A large majority of users use single core ONLY. It is hard to explain
them the need for an extra componentin the url.
I would say it is a design problem which we should solve instead of
asking users to change
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 3:12 AM, Uri Boness wrote:
> IMO forcing the users to do config
[* TO *] on the standard handler is an implicit query of
default_field_name:[* TO *] which matches only documents that have the
default field on them. So [* TO *] and *:* are two very different
queries, only the latter guaranteed to match all documents.
Erik
On Sep 14, 2009, at
First of all let us confirm this issue is fixed in 1.4.
1.4 is stable and a lot of people are using it in production and it is
going to be released pretty soon
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 8:05 PM, palexv wrote:
>
> I am using 1.3
> Do you suggest 1.4 from developer trunk? I am concern if it stable.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 2:39 AM, Paul Rosen wrote:
>
> I've done a few experiments with searching two cores with the same schema
> using the shard syntax. (using solr 1.3)
>
> My use case is that I want to have multiple cores because a few different
> people will be managing the indexing, and that
39 matches
Mail list logo
