use the dataDir attribute in the tag to specify the data
directory. The property is not required
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:56 PM, Paul Tomblin wrote:
> I'm trying to instantiate multiple cores. Since nothing is different
> between the two cores except the schema and the data dir, I was hoping
>
the backup command can be used on any instance (master or slave). The
backup has nothing to do with replication . The perlication works w/o
backup at all.
either fire a fetchindex command explicitlyor use the pollInterval in
the slave to automatically fetch the index if and when it is updated
On
yonik has a point, when i ran into this i also upgraded to the latest
stable jetty, im using jetty 6.1.18
On 08/28/2009 04:07 PM, Rupert Fiasco wrote:
I deployed LucidWorks with my existing solrconfig / schema and
re-indexed my data into it and pushed it out to production, we'll see
how it stac
I deployed LucidWorks with my existing solrconfig / schema and
re-indexed my data into it and pushed it out to production, we'll see
how it stacks up over the weekend. Already queries that were breaking
on the prior Jetty/stock Solr setup are now working - but I have seen
it before where upon an in
Yes, I am hitting the Solr server directly (medsolr1.colo:9007)
Versions / architectures:
Jetty(6.1.3)
o...@medsolr1 ~ $ uname -a
Linux medsolr1 2.6.18-xen-r12 #9 SMP Tue Mar 3 15:34:08 PST 2009
x86_64 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5420 @ 2.50GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
o...@medsolr1 ~ $ java -version
j
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Rupert Fiasco wrote:
> If I run these through curl on the command its
> truncated and if I run the search through the web-based admin panel
> then I get an XML parse error.
Are you running curl directly against the solr server, or going
through a load balancer? Cu
I know in my last message I said I was having issues with "extra
content" at the start of a response, resulting in an invalid document.
I still am having issues with documents getting truncated (yes, I have
problems galore).
I will elaborate on why its so difficult to track down an actual
document
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Preetam Rao wrote:
> Hi,
> If I have documents of type a, b and c but when I sort by some criteria,
> lets say date,
> can I make documents of kind c always appear at the bottom ?
One way is to simply use sorting.
You could have a string field called "type_c" with
i had a similar issue with text from past requests showing up, this was
on 1.3 nightly, i switched to using the lucid build of 1.3 and the
problem went away, im using a nightly of 1.4 right now also without
probs, then again your mileage may vary as i also made a bunch of schema
changes that mi
Firstly, to everyone who has been helping me, thank you very much. All
this feedback is helping me narrow down these issues.
I deleted the index and re-indexed all the data from scratch and for a
couple of days we were OK, but now it seems to be erring again.
It happens on different input documen
Fantastic! Anything I can do to help out?
I oversimplified my question somewhat.
The realprice can actually be 1 out +/- 10 thousand dynamic fields. Which
one is determined at query time. (price depends on date, class, and some
other properties. The product of the options of these properties amount to
the 10k number ) The avg field foll
That sounds very similar to my use case, too. (Mentioned in the recent
thread "Updating a solr record"). So +1 on allowing updates!
Jason Rutherglen wrote:
Don,
I started work on fixing this a while back. However I plan to
resume again soon. Basically one would be able to update fields
to a pa
Hi,
As one of our requirement we need to backup Master indexes to Slave
periodically. I've been able to successfully sync the index using
"fetchIndex" command,
http://localhost:9006/solr/audit_20090828_1/replication?command=fetchindex&masterUrl=http://localhost:8080/solr/audit_20090828_1/re
can you just add a new field that has the real or ave price?
Just populate that field at index time... make it indexed but not
stored
If you want the real or average price to be treated the same in
faceting, you are really going to want them in the same field.
On Aug 28, 2009, at 1:16 PM
Don,
I started work on fixing this a while back. However I plan to
resume again soon. Basically one would be able to update fields
to a parallel index, without reindexing the entire document.
There are other use cases I've seen for this such as caching.
-J
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Don We
I'm trying to instantiate multiple cores. Since nothing is different
between the two cores except the schema and the data dir, I was hoping
to share the same instanceDir. Solr seems to recognize that there are
two cores, and gives me two different admin pages. But unfortunately
both the admin pa
Or you can just use facet counts.
Bill
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 5:23 PM, AHMET ARSLAN wrote:
>
> > Hi all,How would I go about
> > implementing a 'tag cloud' with Solr1.3? All I
> > want to do is to display a list of most occurring terms in
> > the corpus. Is there an easy way to go about that i
You also need a requestHandler that uses your updateRequestProcessorChain:
custom
...
Bill
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Erik Earle wrote:
> > I've read through the wiki for this and it explains most everything
> except where in the solr
Thanks Paul.
It was confirmed. I hope it will be back soon.
Here is the result from that page : "It's not just you!
http://wiki.apache.org looks down from here."
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Paul Tomblin wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Israel Ekpo wrote:
> > Is the Solr wiki do
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Israel Ekpo wrote:
> Is the Solr wiki down?
>
There's a very useful web page for these questions:
http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/
It confirms that yes, the wiki is down. I'm currently using the
Google cache to read the pages I need.
--
http://www.linkedin.
I have 2 fields:
realprice
avgprice
I'd like to be able to take the contents of avgprice if realprice is not
available.
due to design the average price cannot be encoded in the 'realprice'-field.
Since I need to be able to filter, sort and facet on these fields, it would
be really nice to be
Is the Solr wiki down?
I have tried to access the following URLs and none of them is loading.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/QueryParametersIndex
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters
Spot on. Fantastic, it works like a charm now.
Thanks a million.
On 28 Aug 2009, at 18:26, Joe Calderon wrote:
facet.mincount=1, facet.limit=-1
On 08/28/2009 09:15 AM, Candide Kemmler wrote:
Sorry, I have misinterpreted my test results.
In fact, I can see that facets are missing in the origin
facet.mincount=1, facet.limit=-1
On 08/28/2009 09:15 AM, Candide Kemmler wrote:
Sorry, I have misinterpreted my test results.
In fact, I can see that facets are missing in the original search.
So the question becomes: how is it possible that a search doesn't
report all the facets of a specific r
Sorry, I have misinterpreted my test results.
In fact, I can see that facets are missing in the original search.
So the question becomes: how is it possible that a search doesn't
report all the facets of a specific result set?
On 28 Aug 2009, at 17:46, Candide Kemmler wrote:
Hi,
I have a f
Short version:
Is there a way to either do partial updates to documents (update/add one or
two fields only), or to search across multiple documents grouped by a
(non-unique) key stored in a field?
Long version:
I've run into an issue with the way I'm indexing documents for a new
product, and fig
Hi,
I have a faceted-search enabled index where I first do a simple
search, e.g. by specifying the query term "nursing". Then, I'm trying
tor refine that result using facets.
I found out that the facet-filtered results contain titles which match
"nursing" exactly that aren't in the origin
Erik Earle wrote:
> I've read through the wiki for this and it explains most everything except
> where in the solrconfig.xml the goes.
>
> I tried it at the top level but that doesn't seem to do anything.
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateRequestProcessor
>
>
>
>
>
Look at the examp
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
> Say you have an embedded solr server and an http solr server pointed to the
> same location.
> 1. make sure only is read only! otherwise you can make a mess.
> 2. calling commit on the embedded solr instance, will not have any effect on
> t
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Chantal
Ackermann wrote:
> Paul Tomblin schrieb:
>> The conf file says:
>> ${solr.data.dir:./solr/data}
>> That indicates to me that there is some way to override that default
>> ./solr/data involving something called solr.data.dir, but I don't know
>> if that's an
I guess this thread went offline
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 7:32 PM, erikea...@yahoo.com wrote:
> So...that's the correct place for the element?
>
> I know nothing happened because:
> - the feild I'm creating with it does not get created in updated/new documents
> - the breakpoints I set don't get h
Hi,
Is there a way to query solr about fields which names contain
whitespaces? Indexing such data does not cause any problems but I have
been unable to retrieve it.
Regards,
Marcin Kuptel
Thanks.
Yup, I have reloaded the wiki all morning (GMT+1 time)
Cheers
//Marcus
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Marcus Herou >wrote:
>
> > That seems sweet! One conf dir, many data-dirs = perfect.
> >
>
Are you using SOLR-769 or did you roll your own Carrot2 integration?
Your question might be better served on the Carrot2 mailing list if
you are not using SOLR-769.
On Aug 27, 2009, at 10:17 PM, bhaskar chandrasekar wrote:
Hi,
We have integrated Solr index with Carrot2 Search Engine
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Marcus Herou wrote:
> That seems sweet! One conf dir, many data-dirs = perfect.
>
> Some short questions
>
> * How and where do one configure each core to have separate data vs
> instancedirs ? Still manually in solr.xml or by using the coreadminhandler
> ?
You c
Paul Tomblin schrieb:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Shalin Shekhar
Mangar wrote:
Ok, I've spotted the problem - while SolrHome is in the right place,
it's still looking for the data in
/Users/ptomblin/apache-tomcat-6.0.20/solr/data/
How can I changed that?
One easy way is to hard code t
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Shalin Shekhar
Mangar wrote:
>> Ok, I've spotted the problem - while SolrHome is in the right place,
>> it's still looking for the data in
>> /Users/ptomblin/apache-tomcat-6.0.20/solr/data/
>>
>> How can I changed that?
>>
>>
> One easy way is to hard code that loca
That seems sweet! One conf dir, many data-dirs = perfect.
Some short questions
* How and where do one configure each core to have separate data vs
instancedirs ? Still manually in solr.xml or by using the coreadminhandler ?
* How do one use the CoreAdminHandler ? (Google gives me only refs to th
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 2:04 AM, J G wrote:
>
> We have multiple solr webapps all running from the same WAR file. Each
> webapp is running under the same Tomcat container and I consider each webapp
> the same thing as a "slice" (or "instance"). I've configured the Tomcat
> container to enable JMX
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Paul Tomblin wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Paul Tomblin wrote:
> >>cwd=/Users/ptomblin/apache-tomcat-6.0.20
> SolrHome=/Users/ptomblin/src/lucidity/solr/
> >
>
> Ok, I've spotted the problem - while SolrHome is in the right place,
> it's still looking
have you looked at the coreadminhandler?
say you always write to "newcore"
after say august , you cretae andn empty core "core-aug" and swap it
out with "newcore".
Make every core use the same instancedir with different dataDir
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Marcus Herou wrote:
> Hi.
>
> We a
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 5:05 AM, Paul Tomblin wrote:
> Can I get all the distinct values from the Solr "database", or do I
> have to select everything and aggregate it myself?
>
>
No, Solr has no way to do a distinct at query-time.
--
Regards,
Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
Hi.
We are now rethinking our sharding strategy to shard on the blog entry
publishdate instead of just a simple hash. This is due to that the index
size is growing too much to be handled in one index.
Thing is that we want to select a core based on the publishdate of the
entry. Let's say we have
but you could use facets to do something similar as a "distinct where..."
lets say you filter your query on something and want to know how many
distinct "categories" that your results comprise.
then you can facet on the category field and count the number of facet
values that are returned, right?
b
Hmm, seems I was one day too early with my nightly then:p
Quote from Chris (2009-08-20 17:04):
"i changed it to be manufacturedate_dt since that fits with the existing
scheme ... the data is all made up, but so is all hte rest of our data."
seems like lucene.apache.org is down at the moment but wi
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 9:57 PM, GiriGG wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I need to build a Search system using Solr. I need to keep data of 30 days
> which will be around 400GB.
> I will be using Distributed Search with Master/Slaves (Data will be
> published to each shard on round robin basis). My challen
AHMET ARSLAN schrieb:
If i analyse this field type in analysis.jsp, the follwoing
are the results
if i give "running" its stems word to run which is fine
If i give "machine" why is that it stems to "machin", now
from where does
this word come from
If i give "revolutionary" it stems to "revolution
Thanks for the reply Yonik!
I'm using the nightly from 2009-08-20, so its a rather fresh build. And by
comparing the schema with the one im using now I had made a mistake when
defining the field.
By examining the most recent build, i noticed that the normal date field is
defined as follows:
(its a
49 matches
Mail list logo
