Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
David,
Try to change solr.CharStreamAwareWhitespaceTokenizerFactory to
solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory
in your schema.xml and reboot Solr.
That worked... thanks...
David.
Koji
david wrote:
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
I think the problem is CharStreamAwareWhitespa
Hi,
I had emailed before about the following issue but did not get a response.
I have been trying to reload the Solr core after I make changes to the
synonyms.txt file. With Solr 1.3, I am able to do a reload only after the
first change but not in subsequent attempts (after subsequent changes to
Hi,
I had emailed before about the following issue but did not get a response.
I have been trying to reload the Solr core after I make changes to the
synonyms.txt file. With Solr 1.3, I am able to do a reload only after the first
change but not in subsequent attempts (after subsequent changes t
Peter,
It was committed revision 794328.
Please see:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1241
Koji
Peter Wolanin wrote:
Looks like we better update our schema for the Drupal module - what
rev of Solr incorporates this change?
-Peter
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Koji Sekiguchi w
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Peter Wolanin wrote:
> Sadly, I had to muis the meetup in NYC, but looking over the slides
> (http://files.meetup.com/1482573/YonikSeeley_NYCMeetup_solr14_features.pdf)
> I see:
>
> Solr Cell:
>
> Integrates Apache Tika (v0.4) into Solr
>
> My current checkout of so
Looks like we better update our schema for the Drupal module - what
rev of Solr incorporates this change?
-Peter
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
> David,
>
> Try to change solr.CharStreamAwareWhitespaceTokenizerFactory to
> solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory
> in your schema.
Sadly, I had to muis the meetup in NYC, but looking over the slides
(http://files.meetup.com/1482573/YonikSeeley_NYCMeetup_solr14_features.pdf)
I see:
Solr Cell:
Integrates Apache Tika (v0.4) into Solr
My current checkout of solr still has tika 0.3, and I don't see a jira
issue for updating to 0
Thanks Yonik,
Yes in fact this is the lucid 1.3 release we're using. I posted a bug report
in jira (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1309). I put it under
Analysis, hope that was appropriate.
Thanks,
Robi
-Original Message-
From: ysee...@gmail.com [mailto:ysee...@gmail.com]
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Robert Petersen wrote:
> Exception thrown by debugging component when query hits phonetic filter
> factory with a numeric term no matter what kind of phonetic filter is
> selected. I am reposting with this new subject line thinking this is a
> potential issue which
Exception thrown by debugging component when query hits phonetic filter
factory with a numeric term no matter what kind of phonetic filter is
selected. I am reposting with this new subject line thinking this is a
potential issue which possibly needs addressing in future releases and
should be subm
1) not sure that you mean, can you give an example?
2) you can set facet.limit=0 to suppress the other values
3) add "description:interface" to the original query you used to obtain the
facet counts
Bill
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Nishant Chandra wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to facet on
# All advertisements must at least be in the form of executable code ;)
require 'solr'
Solr::Connection.new('http://localhost:8983/
solr', :autocommit=>:on).add({ :id => "SolrCourses",
:text => '
Lucid Imagination is now offering Solr Essentials Online Sessions, a
s
Hi,
I am trying to facet on the "description" field. I executed this query:
q=ipod&qt=dismax&fl=pid%2Crid%2Creview&facet=true&facet.field=review&facet.limit=10&facet.query=description%3Astorage&facet.query=description%3Ainterface&start=0&rows=20
I have 3 question:
1. If I have to search for a fixed
On Jul 24, 2009, at 9:59 AM, prerna07 wrote:
I have recreated indexes with phonetic filter factory but i am still
facing
below mentioned issue. Please let me know if i am missing something:
I am searching for product_12345 string, which is present in only one
record.
Issue: Solr return me al
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 2:28 PM, prerna07 wrote:
> I am using phonetic filter factory. I am searching for product_12345 string,
> which is present in only one record.
..
> Why is the query showing PRTK ?
This is the phonetic filter at work (the double metaphone filter, if
I'm guessing correct); to
I have recreated indexes with phonetic filter factory but i am still facing
below mentioned issue. Please let me know if i am missing something:
I am searching for product_12345 string, which is present in only one
record.
Issue: Solr return me all indexes which have product_ i.e. it ignore the
I agree. I think both options could be useful - perhaps a 'forceBackup' as
well? Documentation would take care of the rest. Have you added this info to
the wiki yet?
--
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 12:56 PM, solr jay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that the backup
On Jul 24, 2009, at 4:53 AM, prerna07 wrote:
Does that mean my indexes should be created with phonetic filter
factory in
my fieldTypes? Currently I am quering on text fields and phonetic
factory is
defined for uery analyser only.
Yes, if you are applying the phonetic filter you need to do
But, if you just want to use it for updating, you could use the
deduplication updateprocessor - it lets you change what fields
control uniqueness for updating - you could add multiple fields as the
signature, and if those fields are the same in another doc, they will
replace previous occurrences in
On Jul 24, 2009, at 8:33 AM, Nishant Chandra wrote:
Can I use composite key for uniqueKeyId? If yes, how?
No - you get one field to use for uniqueKey in Solr. It is your
indexer's responsibility for aggregating values from your data sources
into a single uniqueKey value. For example, in
David,
Try to change solr.CharStreamAwareWhitespaceTokenizerFactory to
solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory
in your schema.xml and reboot Solr.
Koji
david wrote:
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
I think the problem is CharStreamAwareWhitespaceTokenizerFactory,
which used to live in Solr (when Drupal s
Can I use composite key for uniqueKeyId? If yes, how?
Thanks,
Nishant
Hi,
I am using phonetic filter factory. I am searching for product_12345 string,
which is present in only one record.
Issue: Solr return me all indexes which have product_ i.e. it ignore the
string present after _.
Also debugQuery looks like :
product_4844308
product_4844308
PhraseQue
On Jul 23, 2009, at 7:00 AM, Łukasz Osipiuk wrote:
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1293
We're planning to put up a patch soon. Perhaps we can collaborate?
What are your estimations to have this patches ready. We have quite
tight deadlines
and cannot afford months of development
The patch is up on SOLR-1293. There's a wiki page at
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/LotsOfCores with details on the changes and
configuration.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Łukasz Osipiuk wrote:
>
>>
>> > Se
Does that mean my indexes should be created with phonetic filter factory in
my fieldTypes? Currently I am quering on text fields and phonetic factory is
defined for uery analyser only.
Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 2:01 PM, prerna07
> wrote:
>
>>
>> HI all,
>>
>> I
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Chantal
Ackermann wrote:
> oh, I didn't know that. That did it! (Jippieh!)
> I've pasted the relevant code below in case you're interested.
>
> Thank you for your help!!
>
> Another little observation that I made using the debugger interface:
> it threw an exception
2009/7/23 Grant Ingersoll :
>
> On Jul 21, 2009, at 11:57 AM, JCodina wrote:
>
>>
>> Hello, Grant,
>> there are two ways, to implement this, one is payloads, and the other one
>> is
>> multiple tokens at the same positions.
>> Each of them can be useful, let me explain the way I thick they can be
>
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 2:01 PM, prerna07 wrote:
>
> HI all,
>
> I am also using Phonetic filter factory but it is behaving very weird.
>
> Issue:
> 1) I have total 10400 indexes but when i search for *:* it return me only
> 288 results. AS soon as i remove phonetic filter factory from type="que
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
I think the problem is CharStreamAwareWhitespaceTokenizerFactory, which used to
live in Solr (when Drupal schema.xml for Solr was made), but has since moved to
Lucene. I'm half guessing. :)
Otis
--
Thanks unfortunately I have no idea about Java. Do you know w
HI all,
I am also using Phonetic filter factory but it is behaving very weird.
Issue:
1) I have total 10400 indexes but when i search for *:* it return me only
288 results. AS soon as i remove phonetic filter factory from it start working correctly.
Can someone help me understand the issue wit
please keep in mind that DIH names are case sensitive
try with this
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 1:30 AM, Tagge, Tim wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm attempting to setup a simple joined index of some tables with the
> following structure...
>
> EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION
>
On Jul 21, 2009, at 11:57 AM, JCodina wrote:
Let me sintetize:
We (well, I think Grant?) do changes in the DPTFF (
DelimitedPayloadTokenFilterFactory ) so that is able to index at the same
position different tokes that may have payloads.
1. token delimiter (#)
2. payload delimiter (|)
We (t
33 matches
Mail list logo
