Brian Klippel wrote:
Nope, chrome treats xml as html. Either view source or use another
browser.
I always thought the XML output should contain a XSLT file in it by default.
that way I could debug with safari (and chrome).
-Original Message-
From: Jason Rutherglen [mailto:jason.rut
The harsh reality of life is that you cannot sort on multivalued fields.
If you can explain your domain problem (the significance of numbers "818",
"2" etc), maybe people can come up with an alternate index design which fits
into your use cases.
Cheers
Avlesh
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 1:18 AM, Matt
Actually, "my good" after all. The parameter does not take effect. If
commit=false is passed in a commit still happens.
Will open and JIRA and supply a patch shortly.
-Jay
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Jay Hill wrote:
> My bad, I had a configuration setting overriding this value. Sorry for
My bad, I had a configuration setting overriding this value. Sorry for the
mistake.
-Jay
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Jay Hill wrote:
> I am trying to run full and delta imports with the commit=false option, but
> it doesn't seem to take effect - after the import a commit always happens no
We had the same thing to deal with recently, and a great solution was posted
to the list. Create a stopwords filter on the field your using for your
spell checking, and then populate a custom stopwords file with known
misspelled words:
Y
After each commit the index effectively locks down for replication in a way.
So if your slave grabs from the master while the master is reindexing it
will be updated to the point of last commit/optimize (depending on your
configuration). Same is true while the slave is replicating. So if the
slav
Hi,
I am using data import handler to do full and delta import. I want to use
the replication feature of solr 1.4
For that I wanted to understand 2 scenarios
1. What happens when the slave solr server tries to poll the master at the
time delta import is running on master. Does the slave only copy
Note, also that there are factories for some of the other TokenFilters
in the payloads package from contrib/analyzers.
On Jul 14, 2009, at 5:55 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
The TokenFilterFactory side is trivial for the
DelimitedPayloadTokenFilter. That could be in for 1.4. In fact,
there
I am trying to come up with a way to sort (or score, and sort based on
the score) of a multivalued field. I was looking at FunctionQueries and
saw fieldvalue, but as that only works on single valued fields that
doesn't help me.
The field is as follows:
I am trying to run full and delta imports with the commit=false option, but
it doesn't seem to take effect - after the import a commit always happens no
matter what params I send. I've looked at the source and unless I'm missing
something it doesn't seem to process the commit param.
Here's the url
On Jul 15, 2009, at 2:59 PM, Mani Kumar wrote:
@mark, @otis:
Can I answer too? :)
yeah copying all the fields to one text field will work but what if
i want
to assign specific weightage to specific fields?
e.g. i have a three fields
1) title
2) tags
3) description
i copied all of them
@mark, @otis:
yeah copying all the fields to one text field will work but what if i want
to assign specific weightage to specific fields?
e.g. i have a three fields
1) title
2) tags
3) description
i copied all of them to a new field called "all_text".
now i want to search in all the fields with
Nope, chrome treats xml as html. Either view source or use another
browser.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Rutherglen [mailto:jason.rutherg...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 2:15 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Chrome Web Browser doesn't render properly
>From the
Yeah that's what I was thinking of as an alternative, use enwiki
and randomly generate facet data along with it. However for
consistent benchmarking the random data would need to stay the
same so that people could execute the same benchmark
consistently in their own environment.
On Tue, Jul 14, 20
>From the Solr admin page, solr/admin/file/?file=schema.xml and
/solr/select/?q=solr&version=2.2&start=0&rows=10&indent=on
renders improperly (meaning the XML isn't formatted). Maybe
Chrome doesn't support XML?
I'm building a high load system that will require several search slaves (at
least 2, but this may grow to 5-10+ in the near future). I plan to have a
single indexer that replicates to the search slaves. I want indexing to be
as fast as possible, so I've considered adding another machine between my
Hi,
Does anyone know if Solr supports sorting by internal document ids,
i.e, like Sort.INDEXORDER in Lucene? If so, how?
Also, if anyone have any insight on if function query loads up unique
terms (like field sorts) in memory or not.
Thanks,
-vivek
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:26 AM, vivek sar
(resending to solr-usr per Chris H; all Asian characters removed from
examples to avoid filter)
I'm getting phrase queries instead of implicit "OR" queries with Asian
text. I first noticed it with the Dismax query handler, but it also happens
with the Standard query.
Of course Asian text is broke
markrmiller wrote:
>
> Yonik's patch makes it so that you can supply the TokenStream straight to
> the field and still store an *independent* text value in a stored field.
> When building the Lucene Document, when adding the field, you would add
> the
> raw TokenStream and then use setValue to s
For those in NYC, there will be a Lucene ecosystem (Lucene/Solr/Mahout/
Nutch/Tika/Droids/Lucene ports) Meetup on July 22, hosted by MTV
Networks and co-sponsored with Lucid Imagination.
For more info and to RSVP, see http://www.meetup.com/NYC-Apache-Lucene-Solr-Meetup/
. There is limited seati
Hi,
I get an error while indexing some xml files.
The segments_3ee file is not existent. The point is, if i index the same
xml file a couple of times: sometimes it works, sometimes not.
Does anybody got an idea whats going wrong here?
Jul 15, 2009 5:11:32 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore exec
Hello,
I'm using solr build 2009-06-16_08-06-14, in multicore configuration.
When I issue the update command "optimize" to a core, the index files
are locked and never released. Calling the coreAdmin unload method on
the core unload the core but does not unlock the underlying index files.
The
1. Did you re-index after changing the field type? Changes would not
reflect until you do this.
2. This is highly unlikely, but please make sure that you have
called "text" defined in your schema.xml
Cheers
Avlesh
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Jörg Agatz wrote:
> yes, thats right
yes, thats right...
i have use in al Time
"string" So i dont change something, without the field
like this:
now i test what you say...
And i become a Error
Jörg Agatz wrote:
Hallo Users...
And good Morning, in germany it is morning :-)
I have a realy important Prroblem...
My Fields are realy Bad.. Like
"CUPS_EBENE1_EBENE2_TASKS_CATEGORIE"
I have no Content field ore somthing like this...
So when i will search somthing, i need to search in ALL fie
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> Actually, segments.gen is created by current Lucene versions. It
> records the current generation (the _N in segments_N) in the index, as
> a fallback in case directory listing of the files fails to locate t
Jörg,
You can use copyField to copy all fields into a single fields that has all
other fields' content.
Then you can put that "catch all" field as the default search field.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Jörg Agatz
> To
Revision is a field.
Sorting is not an option because then I sort all document! I want to
filter a subset of documents with the same root version number (field)
and get only one document of the subset with highest revision number.
In other words the root revision number of all documents retr
Actually, segments.gen is created by current Lucene versions. It
records the current generation (the _N in segments_N) in the index, as
a fallback in case directory listing of the files fails to locate the
segments_N file (eg on filesystems, like NFS, where the directory
listing may come from a st
Is it possible to have Solr highlight an arbitrary text that is posted at
request time?
Currently, we are storing an unindexed HTML field in Solr, just to have it
highlighted. We would prefer to generate the HTML from the database at
presentation time, in order to keep the Solr index smaller and f
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Reza Safari wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How is possible to search for max values e.g.
>
> doc1 has revision number 1
> doc2 has revision number 2
> doc3 has revision number 3
>
> doc1, doc2 and doc3 have all same root revision id e.g. 1
>
> I want search result with doc'
Hi,
How is possible to search for max values e.g.
doc1 has revision number 1
doc2 has revision number 2
doc3 has revision number 3
doc1, doc2 and doc3 have all same root revision id e.g. 1
I want search result with doc's with only highest revision number?
Gr, Reza
Even though I could not completely understand your question, my guess is
that you want to do case-insensitive searches. If yes, you may use a "text"
type for this field or add the "LowerCaseFilterFactory" as a filter for this
field in your schema.xml
Cheers
Avlesh
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 1:42 PM,
I search for the Otions for "case-*sensitive" ore *Key* sensitive" to some
or all Fields..
Exist a Option for that? in the Solr Schema.xml?
Problem:
I search in a Field for "ri*" but the real Name is "RI-700690"
"RI*" brings Results, but sumtimes it is "NI", and sumetimes it is "ni" or
something
>Some ideas:
>
>- Use copyField to copy fields to the field designated as the uniqueKey (not
>sure if this will work)
>- Create the field from existing data before sending docs to Solr
>- Create a custom UpdateRequestProcessor that adds a field for each document
>it processes and stuffs it with o
35 matches
Mail list logo
