Out of my head... but are you not supposed to active the stream-handler in
SOLR ? Think it is documented...
Cheers
//Marcus
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Francis Yakin wrote:
> Yes, I uploaded the CSV file that I get it from Database then I ran that
> cmd and I have the error.
>
> Any sugges
Hi,
How do we tag solr indexes and search on those indexes, there is not
much information on wiki. all i could find is this:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UserTagDesign
has anyone tried it? (using solr API)
One more question, can we change the schema dynamically at runtime? (while
solr instan
Hello All,
I was figuring out the issue with the synonym.txt and stopword.txt files being
updated on regular interval.
Here in my case I am updating the synonym.txt and stopword.txt files as the
synonym and stop word dictionary is update. I am facing a problem here that
even after the core
I have been trying to restrict MoreLikeThis results without any luck also.
In additional to restricting the results, I am also looking to influence the
scores similar to the way boost query (bq) works in the
DisMaxRequestHandler.
I think Solr's MoreLikeThis depends on Lucene's contrib queries
More
Have any one had experience creating a datasource for DIH to an Oracle Database?
Also, from the Solr side we are running weblogic and deploy the application
using weblogic.
I know in weblogic we can create a datasource that can connect to Oracle
database, has any one had experience with this?
Hi Otis,
Thanks for your reply and for giving it some thought.
Actually we have considered using something that lives outside of the
main index... We've looked into using the ExternalFileField, but abandoned
that when it became clear we'd have to use a function to use it, and that
limited
that works perfectly! Thanks a lot!
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
> : OK, here is my latest code to get the IndexReader from the solr core.
> : However, it still printed out the non-string fields as special chars. I
> do
> : use the schema file here. Please help.
>
> you'
: OK, here is my latest code to get the IndexReader from the solr core.
: However, it still printed out the non-string fields as special chars. I do
: use the schema file here. Please help.
you'll want to use the IndexSchema object to get the FieldType
object for your field name. then use the Fi
It looks that the problem is here or before that in
SnapPuller.fetchLatestIndex():
terminateAndWaitFsyncService();
LOG.info("Conf files are not downloaded or are in sync");
if (isSnapNeeded) {
modifyIndexProps(tmpIndexDir.getName());
} else {
Yes, I uploaded the CSV file that I get it from Database then I ran that cmd
and I have the error.
Any suggestions?
Thanks
Francis
-Original Message-
From: NitinMalik [mailto:malik.ni...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 11:32 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Is the
Hi Francis,
I have experienced that update stream handler (for a xml file in my case)
worked only for Solr running on the same machine. I also got same error when
I tried to update the documents on a remote Solr instance.
Regards
Nitin
Francis Yakin wrote:
>
>
> Ok, I have a CSV file(call
I could not find any support from http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MoreLikeThis on
how to restrict MLT results to certain subsets. I passed along a fq
parameter and it is ignored. Since we can not incorporate the filters in the
query itself which is used to retrieve the target for similarity comparison
Ok, I have a CSV file(called it test.csv) from database.
When I tried to upload this file to solr using this cmd, I got
"stream.contentType=text/plain: No such file or directory" error
curl
http://localhost:8983/solr/update/csv?stream.file=/opt/apache-1.2.0/example/exampledocs/test.csv&stream.
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 09:56:03 -0700
Francis Yakin wrote:
> Norberto,
>
> Thanks, I think my questions is:
>
> >>why not generate your SQL output directly into your oracle server as a file
>
> What type of file is this?
>
>
a file in a format that you can then import into SOLR.
Norberto,
Thanks, I think my questions is:
>>why not generate your SQL output directly into your oracle server as a file
What type of file is this?
Thanks again for your help.
Francis
-Original Message-
From: Norberto Meijome [mailto:numard...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009
And if you don't mind using the nightly Solr build, the admin page caching has
been fixed in the trunk, so this won't bite you again.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Lee Theobald
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent:
Is there a benefit to using MMapDirectory instead of, say, tmpfs (RAM disk)
under Linux?
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Mark Miller
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, July 6, 2009 9:28:43 AM
> Subject: Re:
I actually don't fully understand your question.
q=+fileID:111+fileID:222+fileID:333+apple looks like a valid query to me.
(not sure what that space encoded as + is, though)
Also not sure what you mean by:
> Basically the requirement is , if fileIDs are provided as search parameter
> then search
I don't recall seeing that mentioned at all... but my memory fails me all the
time. Who's Solr?
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: A. Steven Anderson
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, July 6, 2009 12:25:48 PM
I thought this would be a quick yes or no answer and/or reference to another
thread, but alas, I got no replies.
Is it safe to assume the answer is 'no' for both Solr 1.3 and 1.4?
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 3:48 PM, A. Steven Anderson wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> I thought I remembered seeing a thread r
Indeed that was one of the first approaches...
Thanks a lot!
Michael Ludwig wrote:
Wallace schrieb:
I'd like to hear what approaches are being used by users to know what
people is searching for in their apps.
You could process the access log.
You could write a filter servlet logging the re
Sorry if I am missing something obvious here
Is there a way to group and sort by facet count? I have a large set of
images, each of which is part of a different "collection." I am performing
a faceted search:
/solr/select/?q=my+term&max=30&version=2.2&rows=30&start=0&facet=true&facet.field=
The problem turned out to be two fold. Firstly, Tomcat was caching an old
version on the admin page (hiding the replication link and some other info)
and secondly I had a mistake in some configuration meaning the indexes
weren't building in the correct places. But it's sorted now and I have some
Hi,
I have a requirement in which i need to have multiple values in my custom
fields while forming the search query to SOLR. For example,
fileID is my custom field. I have defined the fileID in schema.xml as .
Now fileID can have multiple values like 111,222,333 etc. So will my query
be of the form
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Lee Theobald wrote:
>
> I think it's best if I just clear down and start again. I've got something
> wrong somewhere. I've noticed that what I consider to be the slave does
> have a "Replication" link in the admin area. My master doesn't. They both
> seem to b
I think it's best if I just clear down and start again. I've got something
wrong somewhere. I've noticed that what I consider to be the slave does
have a "Replication" link in the admin area. My master doesn't. They both
seem to be reporting the same version from the info page
(1.3.0.2009.06.3
Cheers for the info Mark. That looks pretty similar to what I have. Slave
is almost the same, master was slightly different but I don't think
incorrect:
optimize
optimize
solrconfig_slave.xml:solrconfig.xml,schema.xml,stopwords.txt,elevate.xml
I'll keep looking as I'm bound to have mis
Lee Theobald wrote:
Hi all,
I've been trying to get the replication working in my test version of Solr
(1.4) but I don't think I've got it right. There doesn't seem to be any
errors but it doesn't seem to be working either. I'm going to the
distribution admin page [1] and just getting a bit of
Does Solr support faceting on MoreLikeThis search results?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Faceting-with-MoreLikeThis-tp24356166p24356166.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi all,
I've been trying to get the replication working in my test version of Solr
(1.4) but I don't think I've got it right. There doesn't seem to be any
errors but it doesn't seem to be working either. I'm going to the
distribution admin page [1] and just getting a bit of text telling me "No
Marc Sturlese wrote:
Hey there,
For testing purpose I am trying to use lucene's MMapDirectory in a recent
Solr nightly instance. I have read in Lucene's documentation:
"To use MMapDirectory, invoke Java with the System property
org.apache.lucene.FSDirectory.class set to
org.apache.lucene.store.M
Yes exactly just being friendly sharing a working routine. Took me some
hours to figure out DIH myself at the time.
//Marcus
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Norberto Meijome wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Jul 2009 21:36:35 +0200
> Marcus Herou wrote:
>
> > Sharing some of our exports from DB to solr. Note:
On Sun, 5 Jul 2009 10:28:16 -0700
Francis Yakin wrote:
[...]>
> >upload the file to your SOLR server? Then the data file is local to your SOLR
> >server , you will bypass any WAN and firewall you may be having. (or some
> >variation of it, sql -> SOLR server as file, etc..)
>
> How we upload th
On Sun, 5 Jul 2009 21:36:35 +0200
Marcus Herou wrote:
> Sharing some of our exports from DB to solr. Note: many of the statements
> below might not work due to clip-clip.
thx Marcus - but that's a DIH config right? :)
b
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
"I respect faith,
Hey there,
For testing purpose I am trying to use lucene's MMapDirectory in a recent
Solr nightly instance. I have read in Lucene's documentation:
"To use MMapDirectory, invoke Java with the System property
org.apache.lucene.FSDirectory.class set to
org.apache.lucene.store.MMapDirectory. This wil
Shalin,
First of all each entity data is unrelated so it makes sense to use solr
core concept as per your suggestion.
But Since you are suggesting putting each entity index on same box will
consume CPU so does it make sense to add boxes based on number of
entities considering i will have to add re
Wallace schrieb:
I'd like to hear what approaches are being used by users to know what
people is searching for in their apps.
You could process the access log.
You could write a filter servlet logging the relevant part of the query
string to a dedicated location.
Michael Ludwig
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Sumit Aggarwal wrote:
> Hi Shalin,
> Yes i want to achieve a logical separation of indexes for performance
> reason
> also else index size will keep on growing as i have 8 different entities. I
> am already partitioning all these entities to different servers also o
Shalin,
at a time i will be doing search only on one entity... Also data will be
indexed only to corresponding entity.
Thanks,
Sumit
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Sumit Aggarwal wrote:
> Hi Shalin,
> Yes i want to achieve a logical separation of indexes for performance
> reason also else index
Hi Shalin,
Yes i want to achieve a logical separation of indexes for performance reason
also else index size will keep on growing as i have 8 different entities. I
am already partitioning all these entities to different servers also on
which i will be doing search based on distributed search by sol
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Sumit Aggarwal wrote:
> I was trying to implement entity based partitioning using multiple core
> feature.
> So my solr.xml is like :
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Now using http://localhost:8983/solr/User/ or
> http://localhost:8983/solr/Group/ i am able to rea
I forgot to mention i already have a partitioning to 3 different servers for
each entity based on some unique int value.
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Sumit Aggarwal wrote:
> I was trying to implement entity based partitioning using multiple core
> feature.
> So my solr.xml is like :
>
>
>
I was trying to implement entity based partitioning using multiple core
feature.
So my solr.xml is like :
Now using http://localhost:8983/solr/User/ or
http://localhost:8983/solr/Group/ i am able to reach seperate partition for
entity based search. Now question arises for entity based in
43 matches
Mail list logo
