Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 8:07 PM, noor wrote:
explicit
tandem
true
Now, my webapp runs fine by,
http://localhost:8983/mysearch
searching also working fine.
But, these are not run through my custom handler.
Specify the full package to your handler cla
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 2:44 AM, Phil Hagelberg wrote:
> Shalin Shekhar Mangar writes:
>
>> You are right. In Solr/Lucene, a commit exposes updates to searchers. So you
>> need to call commit on the master for the slave to pick up the changes.
>> Replicating changes from the master and then not ex
Hello,
I am storing items in an index. Each item has a comma separated list
of related items. Is it possible to bring back an item and all of its
related items in one query? If so how and how would you distinguish
between which one is the main item and which are the related.
Any help is m
That was exactly my issue... i changed my code to not reuse
document/fields and it is all good now!
Thanks for your support!
Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Alexander Wallace wrote:
Hi all!
I'm using Solr 1.3 and currently testing reindexing...
In my clie
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Mukerjee, Neiloy
(Neil) wrote:
> I am installing Solr 1.3.0, and currently have been trying to use Tomcat 5.5.
> This hasn't been working so far for me, and I have been told (unofficially)
> that my installation would go more smoothly if I were to use Tomcat 6. Do
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 1:36 AM, Ensdorf Ken wrote:
> I ran into this very issue recently as we are using a "freshness" filter
> for our data that can be 6//12/18 months etc. I discovered that even though
> we were only indexing with day-level granularity, we were specifying the
> query by compu
Thanks, I'll check it out.
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
>
>
> Britske,
>
> I'd have to dig, but there are a couple of JIRA issues in Lucene's JIRA
> (the actual ngram code is part of Lucene) that have to do with ngram
> positions. I have a feeling that may be the problem.
>
> Otis
> --
> Semat
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 2:25 AM, Mukerjee, Neiloy (Neil) <
neil.muker...@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
> I am installing Solr 1.3.0, and currently have been trying to use Tomcat
> 5.5. This hasn't been working so far for me, and I have been told
> (unofficially) that my installation would go more smo
Shalin Shekhar Mangar writes:
> You are right. In Solr/Lucene, a commit exposes updates to searchers. So you
> need to call commit on the master for the slave to pick up the changes.
> Replicating changes from the master and then not exposing new documents to
> searchers does not make sense. Howe
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 1:25 AM, Phil Hagelberg wrote:
>
> OK, so I inserted some more documents into the master, and now
> replication works. I get the feeling it may be due to this line in the
> master's solrconfig.xml:
>
> commit
>
> Now this is confusing since it seems that the timing of rep
I am installing Solr 1.3.0, and currently have been trying to use Tomcat 5.5.
This hasn't been working so far for me, and I have been told (unofficially)
that my installation would go more smoothly if I were to use Tomcat 6. Does
anyone have experiencing with Solr 1.3 and Tomcat 5.5?
Right after I sent the email I went on and checked for uniqueness of
documents...
In theory the were all supposed to be unique... But i've realized that
the platform I'm using to reindex, is delaying sending the requests,
this in combination with my reindexers reusing document fields (instead
Hi,
Has anyone successfully used localsolr and collapse together in Solr
1.4. I am getting two result-sets one from localsolr and other from
collapse. I need a merged result-set.
Any pointers ???
> -Original Message-
> From: Fergus McMenemie [mailto:fer...@twig.me.uk]
> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 3:41 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: fq vs. q
>
> >On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Michael Ludwig
> wrote:
> >
> >> I've summarized what I've learnt about filter qu
Um, yes this works.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Jeff Rodenburg
wrote:
> If I want to run the stable 1.3 release and the nightly build under the
> same Tomcat instance, should that be configured as multiple solr
> applications, or is there a different configuration to follow?
>
Phil Hagelberg writes:
> My only guess as to what's going wrong here is that deleting the
> coreN/data directory is not a good way to "reset" a core back to its
> initial condition. Maybe there's a bit of state somewhere that's making
> the slave think that it's already up-to-date with this maste
>On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Michael Ludwig wrote:
>
>> I've summarized what I've learnt about filter queries on this page:
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FilterQueryGuidance
>>
>
>Wow! This is great! Thanks for taking the time to write this up Michael.
>
>I've added a section on analysis,
I'm trying out the replication features on 1.4 (trunk) with multiple
indices using a setup based on the example multicore config.
The first time I tried it, (replicating through the admin web
interface), it worked fine. I was a little surprised that telling one
core to replicate caused both to re
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Alexander Wallace wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I'm using Solr 1.3 and currently testing reindexing...
>
> In my client app, i am sending 17494 requests to add documents... In 3
> different scenarios:
>
> a) not using threads
> b) using 1 thread
> c) using 2 threads
>
>
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Garafola Timothy wrote:
>
> So let's say I have 2 shards. The first shard has docs with creation
> dates of this year. The Second shard contains documents from the
> previous year. I run a solr query requesting 10 rows sorted by date
> and get 11 from the first
If I want to run the stable 1.3 release and the nightly build under the same
Tomcat instance, should that be configured as multiple solr applications, or
is there a different configuration to follow?
Hi all!
I'm using Solr 1.3 and currently testing reindexing...
In my client app, i am sending 17494 requests to add documents... In 3
different scenarios:
a) not using threads
b) using 1 thread
c) using 2 threads
In scenario a), everything seems to work fine... In my client log, is
see 174
I have a solr index which is going to grow 3x in the near future. I'm
considering using distributed search and was contemplating what would
be the best approach to splitting the index. Since most of the
searches performed on the index are sorted by date descending, I'm
considering splitting the i
Britske,
I'd have to dig, but there are a couple of JIRA issues in Lucene's JIRA (the
actual ngram code is part of Lucene) that have to do with ngram positions. I
have a feeling that may be the problem.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Messa
Hello,
I need to retrieve the stats of my index (using StatsComponent). It's not a
problem when my query is empty, but the stats are update according the
current search... and I need the stats of the whole index everytime.
I'm currently doing two request (one with empty keyword to get the stats,
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 8:07 PM, noor wrote:
>
>
>
> explicit
> tandem
> true
>
>
>
> Now, my webapp runs fine by,
> http://localhost:8983/mysearch
> searching also working fine.
> But, these are not run through my custom handler.
>
Specify the full package to your handler class. Packages st
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Michael Ludwig wrote:
> I've summarized what I've learnt about filter queries on this page:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FilterQueryGuidance
>
Wow! This is great! Thanks for taking the time to write this up Michael.
I've added a section on analysis, scoring a
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Jacob Elder wrote:
> Is there any way to get the number of deleted records from a delete request?
Nope. I avoided adding it initially because I thought it might get
difficult to calculate that data i the future.
That's now come true - Lucene now handles the delet
I solved this NullPointerException, by the following changes.
In java code:
public void handleRequestBody(SolrQueryRequest request,
SolrQueryResponse response) throws Exception {
SolrCore coreToRequest = request.getCore();//coreContainer.getCore("core2");
.
}
and in solr-config.xml:
expl
Thank you very much. I will try using solr nightly build.
Thanks
Mahesh R
Aleksander M. Stensby wrote:
>
> As some people have mentioned here on this mailing lists, the solr 1.3
> distribution scripts (snappuller / shooter) etc do not work on windows.
> Some have indicated that it might be
Michael Ludwig schrieb:
Martin Davidsson schrieb:
I've tried to read up on how to decide, when writing a query, what
criteria goes in the q parameter and what goes in the fq parameter,
to achieve optimal performance. Is there [...] some kind of rule of
thumb to help me decide how to split things
Hi,
Sorry for being late to the party, let me try to clear some doubts about
Carrot2.
Do you know under what circumstances or application should we cluster the
> whole corpus of documents vs just the search results?
I think it depends on what you're trying to achieve. If you'd like to give
the
Hi,
Is possible to identify docId of document where occurred matching in
specific Term or QueryTerm ?
For example: I have a document with some fields and my query possesss the
Query for each field. I need to know the docIds when the QueryTermX finds
value. I know that I can verify if matchin
Yes,
Nullpointer Exception. on the line
SolrCore coreToRequest = coreContainer.getCore("core2");
Noble Paul ??? ?? wrote:
is there any error on the console?
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Noor wrote:
hi,
i am new to apache solr.
I need to create a custom request handler class.
is there any error on the console?
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Noor wrote:
> hi,
> i am new to apache solr.
> I need to create a custom request handler class. So i create a new one and
> changed the solr-config.xml file as,
>
>
> explicit
> tandem
> tru
you can just drop in the new JdbcDataSource.java into the 1.3 release
(and build it) and it should be just fine.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Kevin Lloyd wrote:
> Thanks for the info. Just FYI, I've decided to retrofit the 1.3
> DataImportHandler with the JDBC driver params functionality to
Thanks for the info. Just FYI, I've decided to retrofit the 1.3
DataImportHandler with the JDBC driver params functionality to get us
around the OOM error problem with as few changes as possible.
kevin
On 11 Jun 2009, at 14:42, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 6:42 PM,
hi,
i am new to apache solr.
I need to create a custom request handler class. So i create a new one
and changed the solr-config.xml file as,
explicit
tandem
true
And in my java class, the code is,
public class MyCustomHandler extends Req
Anything sent with delete query will be deleted. It doesnt give u the details
of the deleted records.
For example, if u send a command like
20070424150841 it will delete the record with id
20070424150841 but not give u the record details if it is already deleted.
We need to send some query to sol
Yes...!! you can search for phrases with wild cards.
You dont have a direct support for it.. but u can achieve like the
following...
User input: Solr we
Query should be: (name:Solr AND (name:we* OR name:we)) OR name:"Solr we"
The query builder parses the original input and builds one that simul
-> It should be possible to specify dataDir directly for a core in solr.xml
(over and above specifying it as a variable). It should also be possible to
pass the dataDir as a request parameter while creating a core through the
REST API.
-> A simple scenario which requires this feature is when the
Hi,
I'm trying to highlight based on a (multivalued) field (prefix2) that has
(among other things) a EdgeNGramFilterFactory defined.
highlighting doesn't increment the start-position of the highlighted
portion, so in other words the highlighted portion is always the beginning
of the field.
Hello,
for this you can simply use the nifty date functions supplied by SOLR
(given that you have indexed your fields with the solr Date field.
If I understand you correctly, you can achieve what you want with the
following union query:
displayStartDate:[* TO NOW] AND displayEndDate:[NOW T
As some people have mentioned here on this mailing lists, the solr 1.3
distribution scripts (snappuller / shooter) etc do not work on windows.
Some have indicated that it might be possible to use cygwin but I have
doubts. So unfortunately, windows users suffers with regard to replication
(a
44 matches
Mail list logo
