On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 2:14 AM, Jonathan Mamou wrote:
> Hi
> It does not seem to be related to FrenchStemmer, the stemmer does not split
> a word into 2 words. I have checked with other words and
> SpellingQueryConverter always splits words with special character.
> I think that the issue is in S
First cut of updated handler now in:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1155
Needs review from those that know Lucene better, and double check for errors
in locking or other areas of the code. Thanks.
--j
jayson.minard wrote:
>
> Can we move this to patch files within the JIRA issue
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 2:23 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> 2009/5/7 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् :
>> BTW, if the timeout occurs it resumes from the point where the failure
>> happened. It retries 5 times before giving up.
>
> Sweet! I was just going to ask what happens on a timeout.
> Have you tested t
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 1:30 AM, vivek sar wrote:
>
> I did set the maxMergeDocs to 10M, but I still see couple of index
> files over 30G which do not match with max number of documents. Here
> are some numbers,
>
> 1) My total index size = 66GB
> 2) Number of total documents = 200M
> 3) 1M doc =
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Francis Yakin wrote:
>
> No error, attached is solrconfig.xml files( one is from 1.2.0 that works
> and the other is 1.3.0 that doesn't work)
>
>
Francis, it seems the attached files were eaten up by the mailing list. Can
you re-send or put them up online somewher
I am giving you a detailed sample of my spring usage.
http://localhost/solr/core1"/>
http://localhost/solr/core2"/>
Hope this helps.
Can we move this to patch files within the JIRA issue please. Will make it
easier to review and help out a as a patch to current trunk.
--j
Jim Murphy wrote:
>
>
>
> Yonik Seeley-2 wrote:
>>
>> ...your code snippit elided and edited below ...
>>
>
>
>
> Don't take this code as correct
Yonik Seeley-2 wrote:
>
> ...your code snippit elided and edited below ...
>
Don't take this code as correct (or even compiling) but is this the essence?
I moved shared access to the writer inside the read lock and kept the other
non-commit bits to the write lock. I'd need to rethink the
Created issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1155
Jim Murphy wrote:
>
> Any pointers to this newer more concurrent behavior in lucene? I can try
> an experiment where I downgrade the iwCommit lock to the iwAccess lock to
> allow updates to happen during commit.
>
> Would you
2009/5/7 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् :
> BTW, if the timeout occurs it resumes from the point where the failure
> happened. It retries 5 times before giving up.
Sweet! I was just going to ask what happens on a timeout.
Have you tested this out (say kill the master in the middle of
replicating a bi
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Jim Murphy wrote:
>
> Any pointers to this newer more concurrent behavior in lucene?
At the API level we care about, IndexWriter.commit() instead of close()
Also, we shouldn't have to worry about other parts of the code closing
the writer on us since things like d
Any pointers to this newer more concurrent behavior in lucene? I can try an
experiment where I downgrade the iwCommit lock to the iwAccess lock to allow
updates to happen during commit.
Would you expect that to work?
Thanks for bootstrapping me on this.
Jim
Yonik Seeley-2 wrote:
>
> On
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 10:55 AM, arno13 wrote:
> Do you know if it's possible to writing solr results directly on a hard disk
> from server side and not to use an HTTP connection to transfer the results?
If you have something like a CSV file (or any other file type that
Solr accepts over HTTP), y
I updated to Java 6 update 13 and have been running problem free for just
over a month. I'll continue this thread if I run into any problems that seem
to be related.
Yonik Seeley-2 wrote:
>
> I assume that you're not using any Tomcat native libs? If you are,
> try removing them... if not (and
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Charles Federspiel
wrote:
> Hi,
> My company is evaluating different open-source indexing and search software
> and we are seriously considering Solr.
> One of my collegues pronounces it differently than I do and I have no basis
> of correcting him.
> Is Solr pronou
On May 7, 2009, at 10:25 PM, David Shettler wrote:
I found myself with a real need for some of the StatsComponent stuff
(mainly the sum feature), so I pulled down a nightly build and played
with it. StatsComponent proved perfect, but... the nightly build
output seems to be different, and thus i
This is the funniest e-mail I've had all day. SOLer is the typical
pronunciation, but I've heard solAR as well. It's the description of
"pirate-like" that made me chuckle.
-Sean
Charles Federspiel wrote:
Hi,
My company is evaluating different open-source indexing and search software
and we
Ranjeeth,
Di you figured aout how to do this.If yes, can you share with me how you
did it? Example bean definition in xml will be helpful.
--Sachin
Funtick wrote:
>
> Use constructor and pass URL parameter. Nothing SPRING related...
>
> Create a Spring bean with attributes 'MySolr', 'My
Hi,
My company is evaluating different open-source indexing and search software
and we are seriously considering Solr.
One of my collegues pronounces it differently than I do and I have no basis
of correcting him.
Is Solr pronounced "SOLerrr"(emphasis on first syllable), or pirate-like,
"SolAhhRrr"
I actually wrote a plugin that integrates Solr with WordPress.
http://www.mattweber.org/2009/04/21/solr-for-wordpress/
http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/solr-for-wordpress/
https://launchpad.net/solr4wordpress
Thanks,
Matt Weber
eSr Technologies
http://www.esr-technologies.com
On May 8, 2
I'm using full-import, not delta-import. I tried it with delta-import, and it
would work, except that I'm querying for a large number of documents so I
can't afford the cost of deltaImportQuery for each document.
It sounds like $deleteDocId will work. I just need to update from 1.3 to
trunk. Than
I have experienced it before... maybe you can manage something similar to
your q.alt using the params q and qf. Highlight will work in that case (I
sorted it out doing that)
Peter Wolanin-2 wrote:
>
> Possibly this issue is related:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-825
>
> Though i
Somebody has writte an articles on integrating Solr with wordpress
http://www.ipros.nl/2008/12/15/using-solr-with-wordpress/
--
-
Noble Paul | Principal Engineer| AOL | http://aol.com
Thinking the same last week, as I was tailoring the snapshooter.sh script.
The data directory should be kept for the temp snapshot, as a way to ensure
linking is occurring on the same device.
snapshooter.sh
87 name=${data_dir}/${snap_name}
I think only this needs to be configurable for the fi
Possibly this issue is related: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-825
Though it seems that might affect the standard handler, while what I'm
seeing is more sepcific to the dismax handler.
-Peter
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Peter Wolanin wrote:
> For the Drupal Apache Solr Integrat
Iam having the same problem.Please let me know if anyone finds answer to
this.
Thank you,
Sachin
markrmiller wrote:
>
> I've run into this in the past as well. Its fairly annoying. Anyone know
> why the limitation? Why aren't we passing the ClassLoader thats loading
> Solr classes as the par
My *guess* is that what you're seeing is that wildcard searches are
not analyzed, in this case not run through the stemmer. So your
index only contains "system" and the funky variants (e.g. "systems/").
I don't really understand why you'd get "systems/" in your index, but
I'm assuming that your fil
Yes, thats correct. I have applied EnglishPorterFilterFactory at index time
as well. Do you think, I should remove it and do the indexing again.
Erick Erickson wrote:
>
> Are you by any chance stemming the field when you index?
>
> Erick
>
> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 2:29 AM, dabboo wrote:
>
>
Are you by any chance stemming the field when you index?
Erick
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 2:29 AM, dabboo wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am facing a n wierd issue while searching.
>
> I am searching for word *sytem*, it displays all the records which contains
> system, systems etc. But when I tried to search
It's what I do from the client side however I don't know how to do this from
the server side (solr).
Sorry if I wasn't clear enough.
Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्-2 wrote:
>
> Solr does not need any special configuration to do this. Just fire
> your query once and save the results xml/json into a
I've run into this in the past as well. Its fairly annoying. Anyone know
why the limitation? Why aren't we passing the ClassLoader thats loading
Solr classes as the parent to the lib dir plugin classloader?
- Mark
Erik Hatcher wrote:
This is probably because Solr loads its extensions from a cu
Paul/Erik,
Thanks for your reply.I have the jar file containing the plugin code and
the applicationContext.xml in solr/home/lib directory.It is instantiating
the plugin code.But it is not loading the application context.xml file from
solr/home/lib dir.But when i copied the jar file containin
KK schrieb:
I'd like to know about the different Unicode[/any other?] encodings
supported by Solr for posting docs [thru Solrj in my case]. Is it that
just UTF-8, UCN supported or other character encodings like
NCR(decimal), NCR(hex) etc are supported as well?
Any numerical character referenc
Solr does not need any special configuration to do this. Just fire
your query once and save the results xml/json into a file or in
memory. When you need them again , just read it from disk.memory
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 1:21 PM, arno13 wrote:
>
> Tanks Paul!
> Yes, I saw it. In fact, if I well und
As long as your indexed documents have the stop words you will
continue to see the stop words in the results.
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Sagar Khetkade
wrote:
>
>
>
> From my understanding re-indexing the documents is a different thing. If you
> have the stop word filter for field type say
I'm guessing that manipulating the client end, acts_as_solr, is an
easier approach then backporting server side functionality.
Especially as you will have to forward migrate at some point.
Out of curiosity, which version of acts_as_solr are you using? The
plugin has moved homes a couple o
I have one type of document, but different searchers, each of
which is interested in a different subset of the documents,
which are different configurations of TV channels {A,B,C,D}.
* Application S1 is interested in all channels, i.e. {A,B,C,D}.
* Application S2 is interested in {A,B,C}.
* Appli
Tanks Paul!
Yes, I saw it. In fact, if I well understand, it could be a solution, but a
little beat too complicate for what I want to do. Currently my client part
is not in Java and I still need a kind of client and server model because
it's a Web application and solr have to be running and waitin
38 matches
Mail list logo
