Re: Advice on moving from 1.3 to 1.4-dev or trunk?

2009-04-19 Thread Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ्
There may be APIs which are introduced after 1.3 release and are not yet crystallized , may change by the time release happens. As a rule of thumb any feature in the CHANGES.TXT post 1.3 is possible to change . But as long as you know what you are using you should be OK. It is not quite possible t

Re: Multiple Solr-instance share same solr.home

2009-04-19 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
I think this should work, but it surely sounds unusual... which always makes one wonder why. Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message > From: vivek sar > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2009 3:28:35 PM > Subject:

Re: CollapseFilter with the latest Solr in trunk

2009-04-19 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
Once somebody really makes it work, I'm sure it will be released! Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message > From: Antonio Eggberg > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2009 9:21:20 PM > Subject: Re: CollapseFilter wi

Re: CollapseFilter with the latest Solr in trunk

2009-04-19 Thread Antonio Eggberg
I wish it would be planned for 1.4 :)) --- Den sön 2009-04-19 skrev Otis Gospodnetic : > Från: Otis Gospodnetic > Ämne: Re: CollapseFilter with the latest Solr in trunk > Till: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Datum: söndag 19 april 2009 15.06 > > Thanks for sharing! > It would be good if you (

Can we provide "context dependent" faceted navigation from SOLR search results

2009-04-19 Thread Thanh Doan
Assuming a solr search returns 10 listing items as below 1) 4 digital cameras 2) 4 LCD televisions 3) 2 clothing items If we navigate to /electronics  we want solr  to show us facets specific to 8 electronics items (e.g brand, price). If we navigate to /electronics/cameras    we w

Re: Advice on moving from 1.3 to 1.4-dev or trunk?

2009-04-19 Thread Ryan McKinley
When you say Test ... Are you suggesting there is a test suite I should run, or do just do my own testing? your own testing... If you use a 'nightly' the unit tests all pass. BUT if you are not running from a standard release, there is may be things that are not totally flushed out, or con

Re: Multiple Solr-instance share same solr.home

2009-04-19 Thread Ryan McKinley
as long as you make sure there are never two applications writing to the same index, you *should* be ok. But tread carefully... On Apr 19, 2009, at 3:28 PM, vivek sar wrote: Both Solr instances will be writing to separate indexes, but can they share the same solr.home? So, here is what I

Re: Multiple Solr-instance share same solr.home

2009-04-19 Thread vivek sar
Both Solr instances will be writing to separate indexes, but can they share the same solr.home? So, here is what I want, 1) solr.home = solr/multicore 2) There is a single solr.xml under multicore directory 3) Each instance would use the same solr.xml, which will have entries for multiple cores 4)

Re: randomizing search results with even display chance

2009-04-19 Thread Yonik Seeley
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/1aa4debdfe46d824/random_search_result For your case, sort by score first and the random field second. sort=score desc, random84235 desc -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Wouter Samaey wrote: > Hi, > > I'm c

Re: Boosting by facets with standard query

2009-04-19 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:02 AM, ashokc wrote: > q=(+(content:umts)+OR+(title:umts)^2+OR+(urltext:umts)^2)+AND+(doctype:white_papers)^2+AND+(filetype:pdf)^2 > [...] > What we need is for the white_papers & pdfs to be boosted, but if and only > if such doucments are valid results to the search term

randomizing search results with even display chance

2009-04-19 Thread Wouter Samaey
Hi, I'm currently new at Lucene and Solr, but I've managed to get some results so far, and like the project very much. For my current project, I need to randomize the search results, but still keep the sorting by relevance. For example, If 3 results have the same score, they can be ordered 1-2-3,

Re: Boosting by facets with standard query

2009-04-19 Thread ashokc
Thanks for the tip. Looks like a neat idea. I have never used the sort feature, so I have to create a new numeric key with values 1 or 2 - value 1 for white_papers/pdfs & 2 for others? The problem also is that the facets I need to boost can vary by query. That is, if the query term 'a', boost the

Re: CollapseFilter with the latest Solr in trunk

2009-04-19 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
Thanks for sharing! It would be good if you (of Jeff from Zappos or anyone making changes to this) could put up a new patch for this most-voted-JIRA-issue. Thanks, Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message > From: climbingrose > To: solr-u

Re: Multiple Solr-instance share same solr.home

2009-04-19 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
Vivek - no, unless you want trouble - only 1 writer can write to a specific index at a time. Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message > From: vivek sar > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2009 4:33:00 AM > Subject:

Re: CollapseFilter with the latest Solr in trunk

2009-04-19 Thread climbingrose
Ok, here is how I fixed this problem: public DocListAndSet getDocListAndSet(Query query, List filterList, DocSet docSet, Sort lsort, int offset, int len, int flags) throwsIOException { //DocListAndSet ret = new DocListAndSet(); //getDocListC(ret,query,filterList,docSet,lsort,offset,len

Multiple Solr-instance share same solr.home

2009-04-19 Thread vivek sar
Hi, Is it possible to have two solr instances share the same solr.home? I've two Solr instances running on the same box and I was wondering if I can configure them to have the same solr.home. I tried it, but looks like the second instance overwrites the first one's value in the solr.xml (I'm usin