But these documents have to be converted to a particular format before being
posted. Any XML document cannot be posted to Solr (with XSLT handled by Solr
internally).
DIH handles any xml format, but it operates in pull mode.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@g
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:36 AM, CIF Search wrote:
> There is a fundamental problem with using 'pull' approach using DIH.
> Normally people want a delta imports which are done using a timestamp
> field.
> Now it may not always be possible for application servers to sync their
> timestamps (given
Hi Pete,
bq parameter works with q,alt query parameter. If you are passing the search
criteria using q.alt query parameter then this bq parameter comes into
picture. Also, q.alt doesnt support field boosting.
If you want to boost the records with their field value then you must use q
query param
There is a fundamental problem with using 'pull' approach using DIH.
Normally people want a delta imports which are done using a timestamp field.
Now it may not always be possible for application servers to sync their
timestamps (given protocol restrictions due to security reasons). Due to
this Sol
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Fergus McMenemie wrote:
> If my data-config.xml contains multiple root level entities
> what is the expected action if I call full-import without an
> entity=XXX sub-command?
>
> Does it process all entities one after the other or only the
> first? (It would be us
Thanks Hoss for your comments! I don't mind submitting it as a patch, shall I
create a issue in Jira and submit the patch with that? Also, I didn't modify
the core solr for locale based sorting; I just added the created a jar file
with the class file & copied it over to the lib folder. As part o
If my data-config.xml contains multiple root level entities
what is the expected action if I call full-import without an
entity=XXX sub-command?
Does it process all entities one after the other or only the
first? (It would be useful IMHO if it only did the first.)
>On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 3:17 AM
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 3:17 AM, Fergus McMenemie wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can anybody describe the intended purpose, or provide a
> few examples, of how the DIH entity= command option works.
>
> Am I supposed to build a data-conf.xml file which contains
> many different alternate entities.. or
>
Is there any api in SolrJ that calls the dataImportHandler to execute
commands like full-import and delta-import.
Please help..
Ashish P wrote:
>
> Is it possible to index DB data directly to solr using EmbeddedSolrServer.
> I tried using data-Config File and Full-import commad, it works. So
>
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Jeremy Carroll
wrote:
> If that's the case it is causing out of disk issues with Solr. We have a 187m
> document count index which is about ~200Gb in size. Over a period of about a
> week after optimizations, etc... the open file but deleted count grows very
> l
Is it possible to index DB data directly to solr using EmbeddedSolrServer. I
tried using data-Config File and Full-import commad, it works. So assuming
using CommonsHttpServer will also work. But can I do it with
EmbeddedSolrServer??
Thanks in advance...
Ashish
--
View this message in context:
If that's the case it is causing out of disk issues with Solr. We have a 187m
document count index which is about ~200Gb in size. Over a period of about a
week after optimizations, etc... the open file but deleted count grows very
large. Causing the system to not be able to optimize due to lack
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Andrew Wall wrote:
> I'm attempting to write a solr query that ensures that if one field has a
> particular value that another field also have a particular value. I've
> arrived at this syntax, but it doesn't seem to work correctly.
>
> ((myField:superneat AND myOt
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Jeremy Carroll
wrote:
> I have Solr 1.3 running on Apache Tomcat 5.5.27. I'm running into an issue
> where searchers are opened up right away when tomcat starts, and never goes
> away. This is causing read locks on the Lucene index holding open deleted
> files d
I might be wrong on this, but since you can't do a query that's just a
NOT statement, this wouldn't work either. I believe the NOT must
negate results of a query, not the entire dataset.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Andrew Wall wrote:
> I'm attempting to write a solr query that ensures that
Wouldn't an entity be something such as a stream, or DB, a manifest-
channel?
The name source would be better to me but... there's the sQL data-
sources.
paul
Le 12-mars-09 à 22:47, Fergus McMenemie a écrit :
Can anybody describe the intended purpose, or provide a
few examples, of how the
I have Solr 1.3 running on Apache Tomcat 5.5.27. I'm running into an issue
where searchers are opened up right away when tomcat starts, and never goes
away. This is causing read locks on the Lucene index holding open deleted files
during merges. This causes our server to run out of disk space in
: I implement the interface and it returns me the current core. But how is it
: different from doing request.getCore() from handleRequestBody()? And I don't
i think ryan missunderstood your goal .. that's just a way for you to get
access to your core prior to handling requests.
: see how this c
Thanks ryantxu for your answer.
I implement the interface and it returns me the current core. But how is it
different from doing request.getCore() from handleRequestBody()? And I don't
see how this can give me access to other cores. I think that what I need is
to get access to an instance of Core
Hello,
Can anybody describe the intended purpose, or provide a
few examples, of how the DIH entity= command option works.
Am I supposed to build a data-conf.xml file which contains
many different alternate entities.. or
Regards
--
If you are doing this in a RequestHandler, implement SolrCoreAware and
you will get a callback with the Core
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPlugins#head-8b3ac1fc3584fe1e822924b98af23d72b02ab134
On Mar 12, 2009, at 3:04 PM, Pascal Dimassimo wrote:
I found this code to access other core fro
I found this code to access other core from my custom requesthandler:
CoreContainer.Initializer initializer = new CoreContainer.Initializer();
CoreContainer cores = initializer.initialize();
SolrCore otherCore = cores.getCore("otherCore");
It seems to work with some little testing. But is it a r
I have queries with outer joins defined in some entities and for the
same root object I can have two or more lines with different objects,
for example:
Taking the following 3 tables, andquery defined in the entity with outer
joins between tables:
Table1 -> Table2 -> Table3
I can have the fol
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Jon Drukman wrote:
> is it possible to make solr think that "omeara" and "o'meara" are the same
> thing?
WordDelimiter would handle it if the document had "o'meara" (but you
may or may not want the other stuff that comes with
WordDelimiterFilter).
You could also u
Hi,
We have installed the Solr in Tomcat server and enabled the
security constraint at the Tomcat level.. We require to pass the
authentication token(cookie) to the search call that is made using
CommonsHttpSolrServer. Would like to know how can I add the token to
the CommonsHttpSolrServer.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Marc Sturlese wrote:
> : Just to clarify:
> : a) what does the stats page show (in terms of the number of
> : Searchers listed in the CORE section) after a couple of full imports?
>
> After 4 full-imports it will show 3 indexsearchers. I have also printed the
> var
If I wanted to hack Solr so that it has the ability to process
wildcards for the field list parameter (fl), where would I look?
(Perhaps I should look on the solr-dev mailing list, but since I am
already on this one I thought I would start here). Thanks!
--
-a
"Ideally, a code library must
Thanks for the reply. Hopefully 1.4 will come soon enough so that we
can still use Windows.
-Original Message-
From: ysee...@gmail.com [mailto:ysee...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Yonik
Seeley
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 9:55 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Replication in 1.
is it possible to make solr think that "omeara" and "o'meara" are the
same thing?
-jsd-
: Just to clarify:
: a) what does the stats page show (in terms of the number of
: Searchers listed in the CORE section) after a couple of full imports?
After 4 full-imports it will show 3 indexsearchers. I have also printed the
var "_searchers" from SolrCore.java and it shows me 3 indexsearche
: I have noticed that the first time I execute full import (having an old index
: in the index folder) once it is done, the old indexsearcher will be closed:
...
: The problem is that if I do another full-import... the old searcher will not
: be closed, there will just appear the line:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Vauthrin, Laurent
wrote:
> Just so I'm clear on it, do you mean Windows replication via Cygwin is not
> supported or not possible?
Not really possible - the strategy the scripts use won't work on
Windows because of the different filesystem semantics. Things lik
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Eric Pugh <
> ep...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> Is this section title Full Import Example on
>> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler still ac
Just so I'm clear on it, do you mean Windows replication via Cygwin is not
supported or not possible?
If it's possible, I'm just curious if anyone else on the list has experience
with it.
Thanks,
Laurent
-Original Message-
From: ysee...@gmail.com [mailto:ysee...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Eric Pugh
wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Is this section title Full Import Example on
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler still accurate? The steps
> referring to the example-solr-home.jar and the SOLR-469 patch seem out of
> date with where 1.4 is today?
>
>
Hi all!
I'm using StandardRequestHandler and I wanted to filter results by two
fields in order to avoid duplicate results (in this case the documents
are very similar, with differences in fields that are not returned in a
query response).
For example, considering the response:
285
186_
I have noticed that the first time I execute full import (having an old index
in the index folder) once it is done, the old indexsearcher will be closed:
2009-03-12 13:05:06,200 [pool-7-thread-1] INFO
org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore - [core_01] Registered new searcher
searc...@c6692 main
2009-03-1
Hi,
I've designed a "front" handler that will send request to other handlers and
return a aggregated response.
Inside this handler, I call other handlers like this (inside the method
handleRequestBody):
SolrCore core = req.getCore();
SolrRequestHandler mlt = core.getRequestHandler("/mlt");
Modi
Thank you! Next time I will remind not to change the words to make the
example simpler...
blah is not the same as Nefh :-)
Thanks,
Bruno
2009/3/12 Erik Hatcher
>
> On Mar 12, 2009, at 10:47 AM, Bruno Aranda wrote:
>
>> Doing this query:
>>
>> http://localhost:18080/solr/core_pub/select/?q=mit
On Mar 12, 2009, at 10:47 AM, Bruno Aranda wrote:
Doing this query:
http://localhost:18080/solr/core_pub/select/?q=mitab:Nefh
Find 1 result. The term "Nefh" is found in the field "mitab".
Doing:
http://localhost:18080/solr/core_pub/select/?q=mitab:Nefh*
Finds nothing.
I have realised that
Thanks again. This is the default request handler:
explicit
Doing this query:
http://localhost:18080/solr/core_pub/select/?q=mitab:Nefh
Find 1 result. The term "Nefh" is found in the field "mitab".
Doing:
http://localhost:18080/solr/core_pub/select/?q=mitab:Nefh*
Folks,
Is this section title Full Import Example on http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler
still accurate? The steps referring to the example-solr-home.jar
and the SOLR-469 patch seem out of date with where 1.4 is today?
Seems like the example-DIH stuff is simpler/more direct ex
I was successful at distributing the Solr-1.4-DEV data import functionality
within the Solr 1.3 war.
1. Copy the data import’s src directory from 1.4 to 1.3.
2. Made sure to used the data import’s build.xml already existing in Solr
1.3
3. Commented out all code within #SolrWriter.rollback method
4
Hi All,
I have a question regarding the dismax handler and minimum match (mm=)
I have an index which we are setting the default operator to AND.
Am I right in saying that using the dismax handler, the default operator in
the schema file is effectively ignored? (This is the conclusion I've made
fr
Hi Shalin Shekhar Mangar,
Thanks for your inputs.
Please see my comments below.
I wish to know if there is any user who used EmbeddedSolrServer for
indexing and CommonsHttpSolrServer for search.
I have found that this combination offers better performance for
indexing. Searching becomes f
What is the full query you're issuing to Solr and the corresponding
request handler configuration?
Chances are you're using the dismax query parser, which does not
support wildcards. Other things to check, be sure you've tied the
field to your new textIntact type, and that you're searching
Hi,
I have managed to build an index in Solr which I can search on keyword,
produce facets, query facets etc. This is all working great. I have
implemented my search using a dismax query so it searches predetermined
fields.
However, my results are coming back sorted by score which appears to be
c
Thanks for your answer, I am trying now with this custom text field:
And still it does not find "blah" when using the wildcard and searching for
"blah*". Am I missing something?
Thanks,
Bruno
2009/3/12 Erik Hatcher
> Remove the
Remove the EnglishPorterFilterFactory from your "text" analyzer
configuration (both index and query sides). And reindex all documents.
Erik
On Mar 12, 2009, at 8:28 AM, Bruno Aranda wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to disable stemming from the analyzer, but I am not sure
how to
do it.
Fo
Hi,
I am trying to disable stemming from the analyzer, but I am not sure how to
do it.
For instance, I have a field that contains "blah", but when I search for
"blah*" it cannot find it, whereas if I search for "bla*" it does. I was
using the text type field, from the example schema.xml. How shou
Hoss
Assume my current working directory is C:/MyApplication/searchApp
and in the solr.xml i am specifying C:/lib as shared lib,
then the console output contains the following line:
INFO: loading shared library: C:\MyApplication\searchApp\C:\lib
Thanks
con
hossman wrote:
>
> Adding '" +
The old IndexSearcher is beeing closed correctly:
2009-03-12 13:05:06,200 [pool-7-thread-1] INFO
org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore - [core_01] Registered new searcher
searc...@c6692 main
2009-03-12 13:05:06,200 [pool-7-thread-1] INFO
org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher - Closing searc...@1c5cd
Hi,
Date range query is working fine for me. This is the query I entered.
q=productPublicationDate_product_dt:1993-02-01T12:00:00Z&version=2.2&start=0&rows=10&indent=on&qt=dismaxrequest
It threw this exception:
type Status report
message Invalid Date String:'1993-02-01t12'
description The re
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 4:39 PM, dabboo wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am able to rectify that exception but now what I am looking for is : How
> I
> can pass the value to the date field to search for the record of a specific
> date value. e.g. I want to retrieve all the records of Jan 01, 2007. How I
> wi
Hi,
I am able to rectify that exception but now what I am looking for is : How I
can pass the value to the date field to search for the record of a specific
date value. e.g. I want to retrieve all the records of Jan 01, 2007. How I
will pass the value with the column name. If I pass the value it
Folks,
Template transformer will fail to return if a variable if undefined,
however the regex transformer does still return. So where the
following would fail:-
This can be used instead:-
So I guess we have the best of both worlds!
Fergus.
>Hmmm. Just gave that a go! No luck
>But how many
here is the exhaustive list of all changes in 1.4
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/trunk/CHANGES.txt
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Praveen Kumar Jayaram
wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> What is the exact difference between Solr 1.3 and Solr 1.4 (Nightly build as
> of now)??
> Heard SolrJ is not p
Hi
What is the exact difference between Solr 1.3 and Solr 1.4 (Nightly build as
of now)??
Heard SolrJ is not part of Solr and performance is great in Solr 1.4
Please tell exactly what all going to differ in Solr 1.4
If possible please provide a pointer which describes the same.
-
Regards,
Hi,
I am implementing date search criteria in Solr using q query parameter with
dismax request.
This is the data, I have.
2.4177726E-8
product_4100025
product_4100025
productIndex
productIndex
Fiction
Fiction
CE
CE
0205583527
0205583527
9781592402939
9781592402939
Daughter of the Mountains
Dau
Is your final query in this format ?
col1:[2009-01-01T00:00:00Z+TO+2009-01-01T23:59:59Z]
From: dabboo
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 12:27:48 AM
Subject: Date Search with q query parameter
Hi,
I am facing an issue with the dat
I was wondering if there is any way of highlighting the searched term in the
resultset directly instead of having it as a separate "lst" element.
Doing it through xsl transformation would be one way.
Has anybody implemented any other better solution ?
e.g
iPhone
iphone sell buy/str>
20
Hi,
I am facing an issue with the date field, I have in my records.
e.g. I am using q query parameter and passing some string as search criteria
like "test". While creating query with q parameter, how query forms is:
column1:test | column2:test | column3:test . ...
I have one column as date co
62 matches
Mail list logo