RE: Query Boosting using both BQ and BF

2009-03-07 Thread Dean Missikowski (Consultant), CLSA
Some more experiments have helped me answer my own questions. > Q1. Can anyone confirm whether bf and bq can both > be used together in solrconfig.xml? yes > Q3. Can I have multiple bq parameters? If so, do I > space-separate them as a single bq, or provide > multiple BQs? Yes, multiple bq par

Re: Type of object to go into NamedList as part of SearchComponent#process(ResponseBuilder rb)

2009-03-07 Thread Shalin Shekhar Mangar
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 5:34 AM, Rakesh Sinha wrote: > > client: > > QueryResponse rsp = commonsHttpSolrServer.query( mySolrQuery); > MySerializableType obj = rsp.getResponse().get("myresult"); > > I was curious if the above mentioned code would work for any kind of > serializable type ,

Query Boosting using both BQ and BF

2009-03-07 Thread Dean Missikowski (Consultant), CLSA
Hi, I have a couple of questions related to query boosting using the dismax request handler. I'm using a recent 1.4 build (to take advantage of omitTf), and have also tried all of this with 1.3. To apply a query-time boost to the previous 3 months of documents in my index I use: published_

Type of object to go into NamedList as part of SearchComponent#process(ResponseBuilder rb)

2009-03-07 Thread Rakesh Sinha
I am developing this system in which I adding custom SearchComponents (last-components) after all the post-processing of the query. server: --- MyComponent extends SearchComponent : @Override public void process(ResponseBuilder rb) { MySerializableType obj = new MySerializableType();

Re: Luke request handler

2009-03-07 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
Revas, use ...luke?fl=FieldYouWant&numTerms=NumberOfTermsYouWant Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message > From: revas > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Friday, March 6, 2009 6:10:23 AM > Subject: Luke request handler > > Hi, >

Re: Multiple queries in single request

2009-03-07 Thread Shalin Shekhar Mangar
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 4:06 AM, Ryan McKinley wrote: > >>> No but you can always fire three requests. Writing your own handler which >>> prints data in a custom format means that you can no longer use existing >>> solr clients for java/ruby/python etc. >>> >> >> That's not a fair characterization