Search schema using q Query

Hi, I am trying to search the schema with the q query parameter. Query which gets form is: +(programJacketImage_program_s:test | courseCodeSeq_course_s:test | authorLastName_product_s:test | Index_Type_s:test | prdMainTitle_s:test^10.0 | discCode_course_s:test | sourceGroupName_course_s:test | i

org.apache.lucene.analysis.tokenattributes package

Hi, I am trying to override getFieldQuery method of QueryParser class, which uses 2 classed i.e. PositionIncrementAttribute & TokenAttribute of org.apache.lucene.analysis.tokenattributes package. I\ I am not able to find out this package. Please help. Thanks, Amit Garg -- View this message in

Re: uploading binary file or rich document through SOLRJ

it is possible , but with some work. you may need to write a new RequestWriter implementation which extends org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.RequestWriter for that . It will be a nice addition to SolrJ if it can be contributed back. On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Erwin Lawardy wrote: >

uploading binary file or rich document through SOLRJ

Hi All, I have been uploading my rich document(pdf/doc/xls) though url and it works properly. http://localhost:8983/solr/update/rich?stream.type=doc&stream.file=SOLR_HOME/test.pdf.doc&id=101&stream.fieldname=name&commit=true Is there a way to do it through solrj as I am trying to build an appli

solr 1.3 - did something with deleting documents change?

Hi, This might be a very silly question that's documented everywhere but I just can't find an answer right now. When we first implemented solr we used version 1.2 (of course, 1.3 was released days afterwards). In the brief period we used 1.2, whenever we wanted to delete a bunch of docum

unique result

Is it possible to have Solr to remove duplicated query results? For example, instead of return Wireless Wireless Wireless Video Games Video Games return: Wireless Video Games Thanks a lot, Kevin

Re: warming question

Shalin your patch worked perfect for my use case. Thank's both for the information! Amit Nithian wrote: > > I'm actually working on one for my company which parses our tomcat log > files > to obtain queries to feed as warming queries (since GET queries are the > dominant source of queries) to

Re: Number of webapps

Unfortunately, I think the way this works is the container creates a Classloader for each context and loads the contents of the .war into that, regardless of whether each context references the same .war file. All those classes are stored in permanent generation space, and I'm fairly sure if you re

Re: debug distributed performance

: Is there any debug settings to see where the time is taken during a : distributed search? I don't think so. the existing timming code will show you how much time each search component took, but i don't think anything breaks it down to isolate the remote requests : When I query all shards to

Re: How the inverted index works.

: I'm trying to understand the internal Sturcture of the lucene indexer. : Well according to "Lucene in action" book , the Document are first converted : into lucene Document Format, then analysed with the standardAnalyser. : I don't understand how the analysed Documents added to the inverted inde

Re: Distributed Search

: > Yes, that's the standard trick. :) : > > Ok, so it wouldn't be possible to have a smaller, faster authoritative : > > shard for near-real-time updates while keeping the entire dataset in a : > > second shard which is updates less frequently? : Ok, now I'm confused, if the shard the document

Re: Error with highlighter and UTF-8 chars?

: I see now that getBestTextFragments() takes in a token stream - and : each token in this steam already has start/end positions set. So, the : patch at LUCENE-1500 would mitigate the exception, but looks like the : real bug is in Solr. so what does the analysis screen tell you about each token

Re: Distributed Search

Fair enough. We should update the Wiki then? I think it currently does read as if its a supported feature rather than something you should avoid. -- - Mark http://www.lucidimagination.com Yonik Seeley wrote: On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Mark Miller wrote: You are not supposed to h

Re: Distributed Search

On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Mark Miller wrote: > You are not supposed to have duplicates is a bit strong - I was over reading > into something Yonik had mentioned in the past. It looks like its supposed > to become more useful: Well, perhaps slightly more deterministic so that two queries r

Re: Distributed Search

You are not supposed to have duplicates is a bit strong - I was over reading into something Yonik had mentioned in the past. It looks like its supposed to become more useful: I think Yonik might have to clear this up, but it looks like the current implementation is not deterministic, and he ha

Re: Number of webapps

thanks will try that .I also have the war file for each solr instance in the home directory of the instance ,would that be the problem ? if i were to have common war file for n instances ,would there be any issue? regards revas On 2/25/09, Michael Della Bitta wrote: > > It's possible I don't kn

Re: Distributed Search

I don't think your supposed to have duplicate keys? I think its supposed to work more as a graceful failure than a feature you should count on. Id's should be unique across the collection. Ok, now I'm confused, if the shard the document comes from is non-deterministic, how can you use this '

Re: Direct control over document position in search results

I looked at that, elevate is a way to boost particular documents based on query terms used. I was thinking in a more general sense... For instance, when google displays search results, the 4th result (typically) are news results, then you tube results come in at another fixed position or better.

Re: facing problem in solr and post request

Use GET. That is the correct semantic for search results, you are getting information. A POST is wrong, because the request does not update that URL. With a GET, you can use HTTP caching. Our HTTP cache for Solr has a 75% hit rate. wunder On 2/25/09 1:51 AM, "Ajay Agrawal" wrote: > Hi, > > I

Re: Number of webapps

It's possible I don't know enough about Solr's internals and there's a better solution than this, and it's surprising me that you're running out of PermGen space before you're running out of heap, but maybe you've already increased the general heap size without tweaking PermGen, and loading all the

solr 1.4: multi-select for statscomponent

Is there way to exclude filters from a stats field, like it is possible to exclude filters from a facet.field? It didn't work for me. i.e: I have a field price, and although I filter on price, I would like to be able to get the entire range (min,max) of prices as if I didn't specify the filter.

Re: fastest way to index/reindex

Thanks for your Answer. this is what I am trying to do : I would like to find out how to customize the Lucene Indexing Prozess to obtain a faster search. etheir with Luke or with some other tool. On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: > please don't hijack topic threads, start a

Re: Persistent, seemingly unfixable corrupt indices

One more question: when you run CheckIndex, are you enabling asserts? (java -ea:org.apache.lucene)? Mike James Brady wrote: Thanks for your answers Michael! I was using a pre-1.3 Solr build, but I've now upgraded to the 1.3 release, run the new CheckIndex shipped as part of the Lucene

Re: Persistent, seemingly unfixable corrupt indices

James Brady wrote: Thanks for your answers Michael! I was using a pre-1.3 Solr build, but I've now upgraded to the 1.3 release, run the new CheckIndex shipped as part of the Lucene 2.4 dev build and I'm still getting the CorruptIndexException: docs out of order exceptions I'm afraid. Di

Re: Distributed Search

Otis Gospodnetic wrote: Yes, that's the standard trick. :) Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message From: gwk To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 5:18:47 AM Subject: Re: Distributed Search Koji Sekiguch

Re: field collapsing in a nightly-build

Does someone knows something? I am going mad trying to make it work... it compiles OK but at ejecution time I am getting these errors: Feb 25, 2009 10:36:19 AM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext filterStart SEVERE: Exception starting filter SolrRequestFilter java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:

Re: Collection distribution in a multicore environment

here are the details of the new replication http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > > Hm, I know what you did is recommended, but I *think* I once set up a Solr > instance that had multiple indices and only a single rsyncd.  It's bee

Field Boosting with q.alt parameter

Hi, I am using q.alt parameter for passing the query. But with this q.alt parameter, it doesnt read the QF parameter from solrConfig file. It reads BQ parameter but not the QF. Hence the field boosting is not working with q.alt parameter. Please help how I can achieve that. Thanks in advance.

Re: Collection distribution in a multicore environment

Hm, I know what you did is recommended, but I *think* I once set up a Solr instance that had multiple indices and only a single rsyncd. It's been a while, so I don't recall the details. If you feel comfortable with 1.3-dev, grab a nightly and use the new replication mechanism instead. Otis

Re: search result clustering in lucene

Sushan, http://wiki.apache.org/solr/?action=fullsearch&context=180&value=cluster&titlesearch=Titles Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message > From: Sushan Rungta > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 4:18:

Re: Distributed Search

Yes, that's the standard trick. :) Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message > From: gwk > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 5:18:47 AM > Subject: Re: Distributed Search > > Koji Sekiguchi wrote: > > gwk

Re: Distributed Search

Koji Sekiguchi wrote: gwk wrote: Hello, The wiki states 'When duplicate doc IDs are received, Solr chooses the first doc and discards subsequent ones', I was wondering whether "the first doc" is the doc of the shard which responds first or the doc in the first shard in the shards GET paramet

facing problem in solr and post request

Hi, I am a newbie in solr, please help me to solve this issue. I are facing problem while sending a post request to search special characters. The get request is working fine but in post request we are not getting any result. Thanks, Ajay

Re: faceted query - min and max numeric values

Great! This StatComponent exactly meets my needs. Any info about a stable Solr1.4 release date ? Any roadmap somewhere ? Thanks Erik 2009/2/23 Erik Hatcher > Have a look at the StatsComponent, added after Solr 1.3 release though. > You can grab a nightly build to have it built-in. > > More in

search result clustering in lucene

I am using lucene in my website (clickindia.com), and it is giving me good results. Now I would like to implement "search result clustering" in my searches, and I am unable to find any kind of related document on the same. Please suggest me some kind of relevant documents, which could help me in

Re: Debugging Lucene Code

dabboo wrote: Hi, I am trying to debug code of QueryParser class and other related files. I have also taken the code of lucene from its SVN, but it is not going to the right control during debug. I wnated to know if I have taken the latest code and if not, from where I can take the code. Thans

Number of webapps

Hi I am sure this question has been repeated many times over and there has been several generic answers ,but i am looking for specific answers. I have a single server whose configuration i give below,this being the only server we have at present ,the requirement is everytime we create a new websi