I did restart the solr server. Here is the config.
Thx.
- Original Message
From: Otis Gospodnetic
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Friday, February 6, 2009 10:40:45 PM
Subject: Re: Decrease warmupTime
Have you restarted Solr after you made the change?
Ca
Have you restarted Solr after you made the change?
Can you paste your query result cache config?
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
From: Cheng Zhang
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Friday, February 6, 2009 11:04:07 PM
Subj
Hi Yonik,
I just changed the autowarmCount for queryResultCache but it did not work. In
the log, it still shows warmupTime for autowarmCount is about 45 seconds.
queryResultCache{lookups=0,hits=0,hitratio=0.00,inserts=6,evictions=0,size=6,warmupTime=44055,cumulative_lookups=1,cumulative_h
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Cheng Zhang wrote:
> Is there any way to decrease this warmupTime?
Go into solrconfig.xml and reduce (or eliminate) the autowarm counts
for the caches.
-Yonik
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 3:44 AM, Mark Ferguson wrote:
>
> For example then, if I have 10 cores, and maxWarmSearchers is 2 for each
> core, if I send a commit to all of them at once this will not cause any
> exceptions, because each core handles its searchers separately?
Correct. Though it is a go
>
> > What I'm also curious about is how searchers are handled in a multi-core
> > environment. Does the maxWarmSearchers argument apply to the entire set
> of
> > cores, or to each individual core?
>
>
> It applied to one core unless ofcourse, you are sharing the solrconfig.xml
> with multiple cor
First, I'm new Solr.
I have setup a Solr server and added some documents into it. I noticed that as
I added more and more docs, the warmupTime became longer and longer. After
added 400K docs, I can see the warmupTime is now about 1 minutes. Here is one
log entry:
queryResultCache{lookups=0,hi
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 3:28 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If waitSearcher=false then the commit thread blocks until these operations
> finish.
>
I meant if waitSearcher=true then the commit thread blocks until these
operations finish.
--
Regards,
Shalin Shekhar Man
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 2:51 AM, Mark Ferguson wrote:
>
> I am looking for more information about how searchers work in different
> environments. Correct me if I'm mistaken, but my understanding is that in a
> single core environment, there is one searcher for the one index which
> handles all quer
Hello,
My apologies if this topic has already been discussed but I haven't been
able to find a lot of information in the wiki or mailing lists.
I am looking for more information about how searchers work in different
environments. Correct me if I'm mistaken, but my understanding is that in a
singl
Michael,
There is no single system that will provide Twitter like functionality. You'd
have to look into Lucene/Solr for searching, memcached (for example) for
caching, maybe caching layer in front of Solr (e.g. varnish, squid, apache),
something to store the data in (e.g. RDBMS, HBase, HDFS,
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Mike Klaas wrote:
>
> On 6-Feb-09, at 12:34 PM, Jeffrey Baker wrote:
>
>> Hello all. First post to the list.
>
> Welcome aboard.
>
>> I noticed that if I search for foo:blah&hl.fl=bar, I get highlight
>> output for instances of "blah" in field "bar". Is there any
On 6-Feb-09, at 12:34 PM, Jeffrey Baker wrote:
Hello all. First post to the list.
Welcome aboard.
I noticed that if I search for foo:blah&hl.fl=bar, I get highlight
output for instances of "blah" in field "bar". Is there any way to
avoid that? I'm using solr 1.3.
Try hl.requireFieldMat
Hello all. First post to the list.
I noticed that if I search for foo:blah&hl.fl=bar, I get highlight
output for instances of "blah" in field "bar". Is there any way to
avoid that? I'm using solr 1.3.
-jwb
Just to back up and think about if solr/lucene realtime updating is what I
want to begin with..
Would this be something that a twitter type system might use to be more
scalable and fast? Let's just say that I have a site with as much message
traffic as twitter and I want to be able to update and s
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Rupert Fiasco wrote:
>
> I would like to issue just a spell check query, I dont care about it
> being inline and piggy-backing off a normal search query.
>
> How would I achieve this?
>
> Now, I can sort of achieve what I want by in fact a normal search but
> then
Thanks Otis,
Is it possible to get my hands on the ability in lucene utilizing patches
before it is released to the public? (sorry to ask) - How close is it in the
source code if I didn't care about the documentation/packaging/etc..? So
from what it sounds like, this would be a realtime store(wit
But its deprecated (??)
-Rupert
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Otis Gospodnetic
wrote:
> Rupert,
>
> You could use the SpellCheck*Handler* to achieve this.
>
>
> Otis
> --
> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Rupert Fias
Hi,
I don't fully understand the question, but I'll try...
One option is to simply not remove stop words.
The second option is to use a trick like the one Nutch uses:
http://lucene.apache.org/nutch/apidocs/org/apache/nutch/analysis/CommonGrams.html
Are there more options?
Otis
--
Sematext -- h
I'd say: "Make sure you don't commit more frequently than the time it takes for
your searcher to warm up", or else you risk searcher overlap and pile-up.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
From: Jon Drukman
To: solr-user@lucene
Rupert,
You could use the SpellCheck*Handler* to achieve this.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
From: Rupert Fiasco
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Friday, February 6, 2009 2:47:19 PM
Subject: Issuing just a spell check
Michael,
The short answer is that Solr is not there yet, but will be. Expect to see
real-time search in Lucene first, then in Solr.
We have a case study about real-time search with Lucene in the upcoming Lucene
in Action 2, but a more tightly integrated real-time search will be added to
Lucene
The docs for the SpellCheckComponent say
"The SpellCheckComponent is designed to provide inline spell checking
of queries without having to issue separate requests."
I would like to issue just a spell check query, I dont care about it
being inline and piggy-backing off a normal search query.
How
I need to find a solution for our current social application. It's low
traffic now because we are early on.. However I'm expecting and want to be
prepaired to grow. We have messages of different "types" that are
aggregated into one stream. Each of these message types have much different
data so th
Hey James,
Your log use case remains me to mine... I wanted to use different log files
fore different cores... for the moment there's no way to separate logs in
different files (as far as I know). I sorted it using log4j. What I do is
send the log data to the linux syslog (using syslog appender).
Hi,
I don't find any documentation about Solr Gaze. How can I use it ?
Thanks,
Regards
--
Renaud Delbru
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Hi Lucene and Solr users,
As some of you may know, Yonik, Erik, Sami, Mark and I teamed up with
Marc Krellenstein to create a company to provide commercial
support (w
OK, so java.util.logging has no way of sending error messages to a separate
log without writing your own Handler/Filter code.
If we just skip over the absurdity of that, and the rage it makes me feel,
what are my options here? What I'm looking for is for all records to go to
one file, and records o
Hi,
Now I ran into another problem by using the
solr.DictionaryCompoundWordTokenFilterFactory :-(
If I search for the german word "Spargelcremesuppe" which contains
"Spargel", "Creme" and "Suppe" SOLR will find way to many result.
Its because SOLR finds EVERY entry with either one of the three
I am using the "text" field type in the schema.xml provides basic text
search for English text. But, it has a surprise: the actual text given to
this field is not indexed as-is, and therefore searching for the raw text
may not work. If you search "To Be Or Not To Be" or "s.h.e." in a "text"
field
29 matches
Mail list logo
