Hi Mahendra,
Wildcard searches are case-sensitive in Solr. I faced the same issue and
handled converting the query string to lower case in my code itself. The
filters and analyzers are not applicable for wildcard queries.
FYI
You will also face problem when you use keywords/Operators in your q
Hi,
The case sensitive wild-card search is not working for TextField type.
I have tried searching for UserName:cust*, it gave the results, but
UserName:Cust* didn't give any results. How can I make it work..
I have defined my TextField in following way.
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Amit Nithian wrote:
> Few questions regarding the DataImportHandler:
> 1) My company is currently using Solr 1.2 and upgrading to 1.3 isn't in the
> immediate near term horizon, so I was wondering how difficult would it be to
> use the DIH and SolrJ from 1.3 to pos
Few questions regarding the DataImportHandler:
1) My company is currently using Solr 1.2 and upgrading to 1.3 isn't in the
immediate near term horizon, so I was wondering how difficult would it be to
use the DIH and SolrJ from 1.3 to post documents to a Solr 1.2 server? We
currently have a lot of c
I know this question was asked a while back but is there a timeframe for
when solr 1.4 will be put into the stable release category?
-Jeff
Can you clarify the following in SchemaDesign?
"If you want to have any phrase search work as well as individual
words, you need to have two fields. Both should be processed
similarly, but the phrase search field should not use stemming or
stopwords."
-Yonik
Let me know if there is any additional information I can provide to you. I
even added showItems="0" to the FastLRU to no avail. It still shows them
and eventually breaks.
On 2/5/09 1:32 PM, "Erik Hatcher" wrote:
> I just committed a fix (SOLR-1008) to stats.jsp to escape names of
> items. T
I just committed a fix (SOLR-1008) to stats.jsp to escape names of
items. This should fix your issue, but I'm not quite clear on
why you're getting item_* output without showItems set. I must be
missing a path that could make that happen in the code.
I left SOLR-1008 open for a bit in ca
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Hazer, Bart wrote:
> I'm wondering why the format for fields in the XML response is like this:
>
> Title
>
If the node names are fixed, it is much easier to write a parser. Otherwise,
something like Solrj would not be possible because everybody has different
field
That seems to work. Thanks!
-Jonah
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 4:08 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> In schema.xml, at the very bottom, you should see:
>
>
>
> I believe creating the Factory wrapper is pretty simple. See
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPlugins
>
>
> On Feb 4, 2009, at 7:29 PM, Jonah
I'm wondering why the format for fields in the XML response is like this:
Title
Instead of this:
Title
Is this just to allow validation of the xml? In our system, it would be much
easier to use the output in the 2nd format. Is there an existing response
writer that does this? O
On Feb 4, 2009, at 7:54 PM, Rupert Fiasco wrote:
Awesome! After reading up on the links you sent me I got it all
working. Thanks!
FYI - I did previously come across one of the links you sent over:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckerRequestHandler
But what threw me off is that when I s
Unfortunately, I don't have any reference to showItems at all in the
solrconfig.xml. Below is the fastLRU config. Let me know if something else
is wrong.
On 2/5/09 11:31 AM, "Erik Hatcher" wrote:
> Upon further investigation, these must be comi
Upon further investigation, these must be coming from the stats of
FastLRUCache. Besides the need to XML escape in stats.jsp, you could
turn off showing these items by setting showItems to 0 in
solrconfig.xml. You must have it set to something greater than 0,
right? Is that a recent chan
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 2:02 PM, oleg_gnatovskiy
wrote:
> Hello all. I am using distributed search over three servers, and found that a
> shard query to one of the boxes sometimes results in two hits to each of the
> other boxes. What is the purpose for having 2 hits? Do we need both?
The first hi
On Feb 5, 2009, at 1:44 PM, Jeff Newburn wrote:
I am getting the following on the stats page.
XML Parsing Error: not well-formed
Location: http://solr2.zappos.net:8080/solr/zeta-main/admin/stats.jsp
Line Number 1327, Column 48:name="item_attrFacet_Size_&_Shape"
-
I am getting the following on the stats page.
XML Parsing Error: not well-formed
Location: http://solr2.zappos.net:8080/solr/zeta-main/admin/stats.jsp
Line Number 1327, Column 48:
---^
Not sure what the deal is since it has been running fine for
Thanks Anto! That indeed solves the problem.
Best regards,
Dave.
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Anto Binish Kaspar wrote:
> Hi David
>
> I found a solution for your problem. I have explained it here
> http://www.nabble.com/RE%3A-Severe-errors-in-solr-configuration-p21853756.html.
> Hope i
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Jon,
If you can, don't commit on every update and that should help or fully solve
your problem.
is there any sort of heuristic or formula i can apply that can tell me
when to commit? put it in a cron job and fire it once per hour?
there are certain updates that are
Hi
I would like to get how is a snapshot really. It's obviously a hard link to
the files.
But it just contain the last update ??
My problem is ... Ive cronjob to commit and auto start snapshooter every
5mn, which works properly.
And on my slaves I've cronjob every 5minute to snapshoot. But I d
Simple :) thks.
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Bruno Mateus wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm facing some problems in generating a compound unique key. I'm
>> indexing some database tables not related with each other. In my
>> data-conf
Hi David
I found a solution for your problem. I have explained it here
http://www.nabble.com/RE%3A-Severe-errors-in-solr-configuration-p21853756.html
. Hope it will help you.
Regards
Anto Binish Kaspar,
Acting Team Lead,
E.C Software.
-Original Message-
From: David Trainor [mailto:tr
Finally I make it work on my server :)
While installing the ubuntu server, I choose tomcat to install by the ubuntu
itself. So after installing the server I noticed the there are two folder on
the system
/var/lib/tomcat6/ and /usr/share/tomcate6. The /var/lib/tomcat6/ folder has the
following
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Gert Brinkmann wrote:
> sunnyfr wrote:
> > Yes the average is 12 docs seconde updated.
>
> In our case with indexing normal web-pages on a normal workstation we
> have about 10 docs per second (updating + committing). This feels quite
> long. But if this is normal.
sunnyfr wrote:
> Yes the average is 12 docs seconde updated.
In our case with indexing normal web-pages on a normal workstation we
have about 10 docs per second (updating + committing). This feels quite
long. But if this is normal... ok.
> I actually reduce warmup and cache, it works fine now, I
I added some docs at: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent
and http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FileBasedSpellChecker
More inline.
On Feb 5, 2009, at 4:38 AM, Marcus Stratmann wrote:
Hello,
Are you sending in the same query to both? Frequency and word only
get printed when extended
Yes the average is 12 docs seconde updated.
I've 8,5M documents and I try to update every 5mn so I guess I've no choice
with 8G of ram to have almost null warmup and cache. My data folder is about
5.8G.
What would you reckon ?
I actually reduce warmup and cache, it works fine now, I will see
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Bruno Mateus wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm facing some problems in generating a compound unique key. I'm
> indexing some database tables not related with each other. In my
> data-config.xml I have the following
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
12275 documents in 422 seconds = 29 docs/second. How fast do you want it to
complete?
How much time do the queries take to create a document? We don't know the
size of the documents?
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 4:11 PM, sunnyfr wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry but I don't know where is the problem ??
> Don'
In schema.xml, at the very bottom, you should see:
I believe creating the Factory wrapper is pretty simple. See
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPlugins
On Feb 4, 2009, at 7:29 PM, Jonah Schwartz wrote:
We want to configure solr so that fields are indexed with a maximum
term
frequency an
One thing I dint understand, why the application is trying to read the solr.xml
from /usr/local/solr/solr-1.3/solr/solr.xml ?
I tried the folder permission of tomcat6:tomcat6 and root:root, both doesn't
fix the issue.
- Anto Binish Kaspar
-Original Message-
From: Olivier Dobberkau [ma
Hi,
We have used some time on a similar problem. I am pretty sure that setting a
custom similarity implementation is the best way to do it in solr too. We
ended up by solving our problem outside solr, but it probably would have
been better to set the similarity like you are describing here.
As fa
Am 05.02.2009 um 12:07 schrieb Anto Binish Kaspar:
Do I need to give some permissions to the folder?
i would guess so.
Olivier
--
Olivier Dobberkau
Je TYPO3, desto d.k.d
d.k.d Internet Service GmbH
Kaiserstr. 79
D 60329 Frankfurt/Main
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Frankfurt am Main
Regist
Hi Olivier,
Do you have any guess what is the issue? Its talking something about the
security
Severe errors in solr configuration. Check your log files for more detailed
information on what may be wrong. If you want solr to continue after
configuration errors, change:
false in null
--
Hi,
Sorry but I don't know where is the problem ??
Don't you think it's a bit long ???
2009/02/05 11:30:01 started by root
2009/02/05 11:30:01 command: /data/solr/book/bin/commit
2009/02/05 11:37:03 ended (elapsed time: 422 sec)
idle
−
85926
43347
0
2009-02-05 11:28:19
2009-02-05 11:28:19
2
On Feb 5, 2009, at 4:45 AM, Tushar_Gandhi wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to create a new field type in solr?
Yes, and what you tried below looks right. Are you getting any errors
at startup with that config? If so, what are they?
Erik
If yes, can anyone tell me how to do that?
Hi,
Is it possible to create a new field type in solr?
If yes, can anyone tell me how to do that?
I tried with this:-
Is it right?
Thanks,
Tushar
--
View t
Hello,
Are you sending in the same query to both? Frequency and word only get
printed when extendedResults == true. correctlySpelled only gets
printed when there is Index frequency information. For the
FileBasedSpellChecker, there is no Frequency information, so it isn't
returned.
Yes, I
No I dint solve my problem. Please help me out :)
- Anto Binish Kaspar
-Original Message-
From: Olivier Dobberkau [mailto:olivier.dobber...@dkd.de]
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 11:35 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Severe errors in solr configuration
Am 04.02.200
39 matches
Mail list logo
