Hi,
I have indexed my data as "custom123, customer, custom" for the "UserName"
field.
I need to search the records for exact match, when I am trying to search with
UserName:"customer" I am finding the records where UserName is custom123 and
custom.
As per my understanding solr splits the Alpha
Hi,
I am trying out the dynamic field in schema.xml with its attribute as true.
Right now I indexing 1 articles having five fields in which the two fields
are explicitly mention as text field and others are the dynamic fields. But
while search if the query is fired on the last of the dyn
Problems:
1) If you get the schema wrong it is painful to live with. You may need to
extract all data and reindex with your new schema. To ease this I wrote an
XSL script that massaged the default Solr XML output into the Solr XML input
format. Extracting is really slow and this process took days.
Hi,
I am trying to test relevancy of results with the q.alt field on a Dismax
Request Handler. Term level boosting based on bq information in
solrconfig.xml works fine. However field level boosting based on the qf
information in solrconfig.xml doesn't seem to work.
Query
q=&q.alt=for&rows=1000&qt
A bit of Solr Kung Fu on this topic:
Let us suppose that your data source cannot be changed to use leading
zeroes. Also suppose that the field is required in every record.
The copyField directive automatically populates other fields with your input
data. If you do this:
fieldQuestion type=
Sorting creates a large array with "roughly" an entry for every document in
the index. If it is not on an 'integer' field it takes even more memory. If
you do a sorted request and then don't sort for a while, that will drop the
sort structures and trigger a giant GC.
We went through some serious c
To avoid the "users only see the first page" problem, one solution is: if
the result set has more than one page with high scores near each other,
scramble them.
That is, if the top 20 results range in score from 19.0 to 20.0, they really
are all about the same relevance, so just card-shuffle them.
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Fergus McMenemie wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have been trying to find out why DIH in FileListEntityProcessor
> mode did not appear to be recursing into subdirectories. Going through
> FileListEntityProcessor.java I eventually tumbled to the fact that my
> filename filter
Hello
I have been trying to find out why DIH in FileListEntityProcessor
mode did not appear to be recursing into subdirectories. Going through
FileListEntityProcessor.java I eventually tumbled to the fact that my
filename filter setting from data-config.xml also applied to directory
names.
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 1:53 AM, Marc Sturlese wrote:
>
> Hey there,
> I have asked before about this two questions but got no response... I am
> really interested in moving to distributed search so... hopefuly someone
> can
> give me a hand.
>
> 1.-In distributed search, Solr do a search per shard
Hey there,
I have asked before about this two questions but got no response... I am
really interested in moving to distributed search so... hopefuly someone can
give me a hand.
1.-In distributed search, Solr do a search per shard and get the score of
the documents based on the other docuements o
Is your date_added field multiValued and you've assigned multiple to
some documents?
Erik
On Jan 31, 2009, at 4:12 PM, James Brady wrote:
Hi,I'm following the recipe here:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyFAQ#head-b1b1cdedcb9cd9bfd9c994709b4d7e540359b1fdfor
boosting recent do
12 matches
Mail list logo
