I think it should be possible.
Give the same instanceDir to all cores. Make sure that the solrconfig.xml of
your cores uses a variable for the dataDir e.g. "./data/${solr.core.name}".
The solr.core.name is an implicit property.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin#head-7508c24c6e2dadad2dfea39b2f
solr.xml allows you to mention the other properties as well like
instanceDir, config,schema in the cores/core tag
So , sharing the entire conf dir may not be possible , but it is
possible to share solrconfig.xml and schema.xml
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 8:17 AM, Otis Gospodnetic
wrote:
> Hi Vikr
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 11:52 PM, KishoreVeleti CoreObjects <
kisho...@coreobjects.com> wrote:
>
> Suppose say if a term matches more than one answer_id BUT question_id is
> same then I should return only one question though it matches more than one
> answer_id. This is because I have to show only
I used it with 1.2 but had some unicode issues. Anyone else has had
issues with unicode?
Or maybe the issues have been addressed ?
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 7:04 PM, Ed Summers wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 4:53 AM, Mark Jarecki wrote:
>> I was just wondering if there were any new Python librar
Eric, from what I can tell from your description, it looks like this could
indeed be caused by high frequency of some of the query terms. This is not MLT
component specific, and I imagine you will see similar performance if you just
run queries with those terms from, say, the Solr admin page.
Hi,
There is a Solr PHP client and I believe it only exists in Solr's JIRA system.
It's referenced from the Solr Wiki, too.
Otis --
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: KishoreVeleti CoreObjects
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Se
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 4:53 AM, Mark Jarecki wrote:
> I was just wondering if there were any new Python libraries compatible with
> SOLR 1.3 available or in development? All I can find are libraries for 1.2.
Did you see:
http://code.google.com/p/solrpy/
I'm using it with v1.3
//Ed
Hi Vikrant,
You can always make use of symbolic links to share a single copy of any file.
Otis --
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Vicky_Dev
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 1:22:06 PM
> Subject:
Hi All,
I am trying to do range queries for dates in SOLR.
My schema looks like this.
Now, when I do a query
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=startdate%3A[2008-12-21T00%3A00%3A00Z+TO+2008-12-25T00%3A00%3A00Z]
I get all docs in which the dates are in between 2008-12-21 to 2008-12-25.
After rebuilding my index over the weekend with termVectors enabled for the
relevant fields, I've run some basic testing against the MoreLikeThis
handler with these settings from the SOLR Wiki {boost=true, mindf=1,
mintf=1}.
My index contains around 20M documents, averaging under 1K of content wi
Yonik, thanks for looking into this.
Here is a better example of the problem, using the example data from the
latest dev version. Add the words "electronics" and "connector" to the
features field of the first doc in ipod_other.xml. Now the following query:
http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=e
Sorry, you didn't mention it was only for some queries.
Maybe you could index them twice, with and without boost,
and use different versions in different queries.
I don't know enough of the scoring innards to know whether
you could write custom scoring to ignore document boost.
wunder
On 12/22/
If I do that, how do I turn off the boosting for some queries but not
others?
This needs to be done at query time, I believe.
-Todd Feak
-Original Message-
From: Walter Underwood [mailto:wunderw...@netflix.com]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 10:33 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sub
Try document boost at index time. --wunder
On 12/22/08 9:28 AM, "Feak, Todd" wrote:
> I would like to use a query function to boost documents of a certain
> "type". I realize that I can use a boost query for this, but in
> analyzing the scoring it doesn't seem as predictable as the query
> funct
Hi All,
I have a product to be developed with following main tables in it
1. Question table (Question_ID, Question_Title, Question_Description,
Question_Category, Question_creation_date are columns in this table)
2. My web site users can answer each question (Question_ID (foreign key to
above
I would like to use a query function to boost documents of a certain
"type". I realize that I can use a boost query for this, but in
analyzing the scoring it doesn't seem as predictable as the query
functions.
So, imagine I have a field called "foo". Foo contains a value that
indicates what typ
It sounds like you haven't yet looked at the way Solr handles fields. I
assume that Solr-Cell (which I haven't looked at yet but hope to soon)
indexes everything into a single field. When using Solr on its own, the
first thing you do is create a schema that specifies the fields you want
in your ind
After rebuilding my index over the weekend with termVectors enabled for the
relevant fields, I've run some basic testing against the MoreLikeThis
handler with these settings from the SOLR Wiki {boost=true, mindf=1,
mintf=1}.
My index contains around 20M documents, averaging under 1K of content wi
I don't know much about Solr Cell but if you can see each node's content in
different fields in Solr then you should be able to query it too.
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 6:59 PM, Jana, Kumar Raja wrote:
> Hi Shalin,
>
> Thanks for the quick response. I've found my mistake. It was actually a
> silly
Hi Shalin,
Thanks for the quick response. I've found my mistake. It was actually a
silly setting in my application before sending the documents to
Solr-Cell which was stripping off the xml tags. I was able to index the
document with the xml tags. Sorry for being so hasty.
So the only question lef
I have used Solrj with Solr 1.2 and it works fine. Ofcourse you won't be
able to use the newer API methods like rollback.
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Rinesh1 wrote:
>
> Hi Shalin,
>Yes I am using java.
>I am using solr 1.2 ..As per my knowledge solrJ is not compatible wilt
> solr 1.
Hi Shalin,
Yes I am using java.
I am using solr 1.2 ..As per my knowledge solrJ is not compatible wilt
solr 1.2.
Regards,
Rinesh
Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Rinesh1 wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>I wanted some inputs on the solr result xml.
>>Cur
If your XML documents are of a fixed schema, you may want to look at
DataImportHandler with XPathEntityProcessor
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 5:49 PM, Jana, Kumar Raja wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I want to perform scoped searches in XML documents using Solr. I
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Rinesh1 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>I wanted some inputs on the solr result xml.
>Currently the result obtained will be of the format
>
>
> attrResult1
> attrResult2
>
>
>Is it possible some how to change it to the form
>
>
>
Hi,
I want to perform scoped searches in XML documents using Solr. I am
using Solr-Cell to index my document files. I've noticed that when I
index an xml file to Solr (via Solr-Cell) the field tags get stripped
off and only the values are sent to Solr.
i.e. Say I have an XML document which con
Hi,
I wanted some inputs on the solr result xml.
Currently the result obtained will be of the format
attrResult1
attrResult2
Is it possible some how to change it to the form
attrResult1
attrResult2
The reason why I am askin
Hi,
I was just wondering if there were any new Python libraries
compatible with SOLR 1.3 available or in development? All I can find
are libraries for 1.2.
Cheers
Mark
27 matches
Mail list logo
