: I have upgraded from solr lucene 1.2 to solr lucene 1.3. I have coppied
: all the "" tag of "schema.xml" from the
: solr 1.2 to solr 1.3 it gives an error..
:
: SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Invalid Date in Date Math
: String:'2006-Oct-10T10:06:13Z'
That is not a legal Date
: I found a thread in the archive were someone mentioned the idea of
: making this behaviour configurable (which characters to strip from the
: query parameter). Is someone working on this or is my best option
: currently to implement this behaviour by copying code from
: DisMaxRequestHandler and
: I need to get the Value of all the FIELDS defined in solrconfig.xml when i
: have the Value of the Unique-Key-Field or the corresponding Doc Number. I
: require this because, we need to find the value of a particular field, if a
: document is Duplicated.
fields aren't definted in solrconfig.xml
: 1.- I am trying to use date facets but I am facing a trouble. I want to use
: the same field to do 2 facet classification. I want to show the count of the
i'm afraid the date faceting code doesn't support that. the only ways i
can think of to do it would be to make two seperate requests, or t
: sint sorts in numeric order, int does not.
Actually i'm pretty sure all of the numeric FieldTypes sort in numeric
order using Lucene's built in int/fload sorting -- check out
IntField.getSortField. (the "Sortable" part of the name refers to the
fact that the terms sort "correctly" in index
: >From what I saw in the sources , solr relies on a Filter notion to
: deal with queries involving multicore, but I cannot see why this could
: have an influence on what resources is available from the eyes of who.
:
: Can't a webapp see the same things as the web users does ? j2ee gurus help !
Hi Team,
I am currently using DiscMax Request Handler for indexing and querying to
Solr. DiscMax Request Handler (Ranking / Boosting/ Blocking etc.) is
working correclty.
Issue:
There are different database table on which query was done and accordingly
Solr index will be created.
If any cont
: Would this mean that, for example, if we wanted to search productId (long)
: we'd need to make a field type that had stopwords in it rather than simply
: using (long)?
not really ... that's kind of a special usecase. if someone searches for
a productId that's usually *all* they search for (1
: Hi Hossman, you suggested two solutions. Can you explain little bit more on
: the second option? Iam not able to understand. Kindly explain with an
: example
[...]
: 2) differnet fields. Partition the spectrum of "importance" for your
: values into N buckets, make a field for ea
: I am trying to use ord() function query ord() on created_date. I am
: concrened with the warning of ord behaviour as it uses actual entry creation
: in indices instead of created_date value.
I'm not sure what you mean by "entry creation" the ord function returns
the orinal value ... an "low"
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : > : If I can find the bandwidth, I'd like to make something which allows
> : > : file uploads via the XMLUpdateHandler as well... Do you have any ideas
> : >
> : > the XmlUpdateRequestHandler already supports file uploads ... all reque
11 matches
Mail list logo