https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394268/apache_solr_c_red.jpg
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394282/solr2_maho_impression.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394267/apache_solr_c_blue.jpg
regards,
shrutipriya
Yes, I am sure. Everytime I re-index, I do deleteByQuery("*:*") and then
fetch the rows from DB and call server.addBeans(list).
-Original Message-
From: Mike Klaas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 4:30 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Deleting indi
are you trying to unit test something? I would simply make use of the
Embedded SOLR component in your unit tests..
On 11/27/08, Robert Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know of an easy to use Mock solr server?
>
> Thanks
> Rob
>
--
Jeryl Cook
/^\ Pharaoh /^\
http://pharaoh
Hi,
Does anyone know of an easy to use Mock solr server?
Thanks
Rob
On 26-Nov-08, at 4:48 AM, Raghunandan Rao wrote:
I have restarted and re-indexed all the docs after the change in the
schema.xml. I was able to search even after that.
I hit browser with this url
http://localhost:7001/solr/select?q=name:2124&fl=*&debugQuery=true
Are you sure all the old doc
Hi,
Thanks a lot for your answer : I've tried the patch and it works fine.
regards,
2008/11/27 Aleksander M. Stensby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This is a known issue but take a look at the following jira issue and the
> patch supplied there:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-764
>
> Haven
I did not even understand what you are considering to be the order on your
call numbers.
2008/11/26 Naomi Dushay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I have a performance problem and I haven't thought of a clever way around
> it.
>
> I work at the Stanford University Libraries. We have a collection of over
> 8
Hi again Patrick.
Glad to hear that we can contribute to help you guys. Thats what this
mailing list is for:)
First of all, I think you use the wrong parameter to get your terms.
Take a look at
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/api/org/apache/solr/common/params/MoreLikeThisParams.html
to see t
Hello all,
I'm having this issue bellow .. can some one tell me what I have to change in
the config file to overcome this issue ?
SolrException: HTTP code=503, reason=Error opening new searcher. exceeded
limit of maxWarmingSearchers=4, try again later.
Hi Aleksander,
With all the help of you and the other comments, we're now at a point where a
MoreLikeThis list is returned, and shows 10 related records. However on the
query executed there are no keywords whatsoever being returned. Is the
querystring still wrong or is something else required?
You can omit documents. I recommend doing it with a filter query.
Append the following to your request to Solr:
&fq=-price:0
That does the trick? You'll have to have client logic to only add
that parameter when sorting by price, if that's how you want it to work.
Erik
On N
was hoping there was an option to omit results with a certain value to stop
certain fields containing 0 skewing the search results.
i will try not sending the field if its 0. cheers!
joe
joeMcElroy wrote:
>
> im sure this is an easy question but...
>
> when a product doesn't have a price, I
Can anybody please let me know why is this happening? I have also tried
giving indexed="false" for name field in the xml.
-Original Message-
From: Raghunandan Rao [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 6:18 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Deleting in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394268/apache_solr_c_red.jpg
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394350/solr.s4.jpg
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394376/solr_sp.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394267/apache_solr_c_blue.j
14 matches
Mail list logo
