This is a known issue but take a look at the following jira issue and the
patch supplied there:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-764
Haven't tried it myself, but i believe it should do the trick for you.
Hope that helps.
Cheers,
Aleksander
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 22:53:21 +0100, Grégoi
Hello there,
do you mean a lucene Document or do you mean if it is possible to use an
existing lucene index with solr?
In the latter case, the answer is yes, since solr is built on top of
lucene. But it requires you to configure your schema.xml to correlate to
the index-structure of your ex
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394165/solr-logo.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394475/solr2_maho-vote.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394350/solr.s4.jpg
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394282/solr2_maho_impressio
Hi all,
Can someone of you all tell me whether I can use a lucene document in solr?
Regards,
Sajith Vimukthi Weerakoon
Associate Software Engineer | ZONE24X7
| Tel: +94 11 2882390 ext 101 | Fax: +94 11 2878261 |
http://www.zone24x7.com
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394350/solr.s4.jpg
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394268/apache_solr_c_red.jpg
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12393995/sslogo-solr-70s.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12393936/logo_remake
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394070/sslogo-solr-finder2.0.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394475/solr2_maho-vote.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12393995/sslogo-solr-70s.png
I have a performance problem and I haven't thought of a clever way
around it.
I work at the Stanford University Libraries. We have a collection of
over 8 million items. Each item has a call number. I have been asked
to provide a way to browse forward and backward from an arbitrary call
Hi,
I'm working on an web application one functionality of which consists
in presenting to the user a list of terms to seize in a form field,
sorted alphabetically. As long as one single index was concerned, I
used solr facets to produce the list and it worked fine. But I must
now deal with severa
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394218/solr-solid.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12391946/apache_solr_burning.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394070/sslogo-solr-finder2.0.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394282/so
Just a reminder that if you have not yet voted for your favorite
logos, the "vote" closes tonight at midnight.
Happy Thanksgiving!
ryan
You also don't /need/ to put in a price in the index. If something
doesn't have a value for a field, you can just not send the field.
Then sorting won't be thrown off by the dummy value. Then those
documents simply won't have a "price" field.
Of course, if you need to facet on it or query i
Assuming you know you want to do this at query time, couldn't
you just add a -price:0 clause to your query?
Best
Erick
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 11:00 AM, joeMcElroy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> im sure this is an easy question but...
>
> when a product doesn't have a price, I index the price as
Look at the file
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/solr/trunk/example/solr/conf/solrconfig.xml?revision=720502&view=markup
and take a look at the
line
you may see the defaults there.
you can add your param just the way the echoParams is configured
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Gerald De C
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394264/apache_solr_a_red.jpg
2008/11/23 Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Please submit your preferences for the solr logo.
>
> For full voting details, see:
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/LogoContest#Voting
>
> The eligible logos are:
>
> ht
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394070/sslogo-solr-finder2.0.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394165/solr-logo.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394266/apache_solr_b_red.jpg
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394282/solr2
I am raising an issue for better error checking in CachedSqlEntityprocessor
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-884
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Steffen B. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote:
>>
>> I suspect only one thing
>> are the data types same for pro
Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote:
>
> I suspect only one thing
> are the data types same for productid and product.id
> in the db?
>
Good point. I just checked and they are both int(11). Could the problem be
caused by the different column names, id in the products table and productid
in the dat
Thx Paul
How would I do so? i.e. would you be able to provide a simple example of
putting shard info into the SearchHandlers defaults or invariants section?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Noble Paul
??? ??
Sent: Tuesday, Novembe
Hi everyone,
maybe it's just me, but whenever I try to deserialize a Solr response that
contains the spellchecker with spellcheck.extendedResults, it fails. I'm
using PHP5 and everthing is pretty much up-to-date.
true
will be converted to
[...]
s:10:"spellcheck";a:1:{s:11:"suggestions
im sure this is an easy question but...
when a product doesn't have a price, I index the price as 0. When sorting on
price, these values come up first or last. How can you omit these items when
sorting against price.
thanks
joe
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/omiting-
Hello Grant,
Not much good with Java profilers (yet!) so I thought I
would send a script!
Details... details! Having decided to produce a script to
replicate the 1.2 vis 1.3 speed problem. The required rigor
revealed a lot more.
1) The faster version I have previously referred to as 1.2,
I suspect only one thing
are the data types same for productid and product.id
in the db?
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 5:38 PM, Steffen B. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Noble Paul,
> thanks for your quick response.
>
>
> Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote:
>>
>> What i expect to happen is when you ru
Sorry for not writing clearly.
Yes, it works good for its purpose, and I didn't want to say that moreLikeThis
component does not work at all.
In the same time it's good to know what are the limitations and the problems of
moreLikeThis function.
What I want to point out is that queries_gener
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394165/solr-logo.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12391987/solr.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12392306/apache_solr_sun.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394282/solr2_maho_impression.p
Unfortunately, as it stands the interestingTerms and the debugQuery do not
explain why solr chose the matches it did for moreLikeThis. There is
currently a task in jira to try to add the information to debugQuery.
The ticket can be found here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-860
-Jeff
Ah, yes, That is important. In lucene, the MLT will see if the term vector
is stored, and if it is not it will still be able to perform the querying,
but in a much much much less efficient way.. Lucene will analyze the
document (and the variable DEFAULT_MAX_NUM_TOKENS_PARSED will be used to
I'm sure that for certain problems and cases you will need to do quite a
bit tweaking to make it work (to suite your needs), but i responded to
your statement because you made it sound like the MoreLikeThis component
does not work at all for its purpuse, while it actually do work as
intende
Hi Aleksander,
This was a typo on my end, the original query included a semicolon instead of
an equal sign. But I think it has to do with my field not being stored and not
being identified as termVectors="true". I'm recreating the index now, and see
if this fixes the problem.
Best,
patrick
-
Hi there!
Well, first of all i think you have an error in your query, if I'm not
mistaken.
You say http://localhost:8080/solr/select/?q=id=18477975...
but since you are referring to the field called "id", you must say:
http://localhost:8080/solr/select/?q=id:18477975...
(use colon instead of th
Yes, I totally understand, and agree.
MoreLikeThis uses TF-IDF to rank terms, then it generates queries based on top
ranked terms. In any case, I wasn't able to make it work after many attempts.
Finally, I've used a different method for queries generation, and it works
better, or at least g
I have restarted and re-indexed all the docs after the change in the
schema.xml. I was able to search even after that.
I hit browser with this url
http://localhost:7001/solr/select?q=name:2124&fl=*&debugQuery=true
-Original Message-
From: Shalin Shekhar Mangar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Did you change your schema.xml after you indexed the documents?
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Raghunandan Rao <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am not sure. It is showing in the debug logs as below.
>
> 0.5967079 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(name:2124 in 0), product of: 1.4142135 =
> tf(termFreq(name:2
I am not sure. It is showing in the debug logs as below.
0.5967079 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(name:2124 in 0), product of: 1.4142135 =
tf(termFreq(name:2124)=2) 1.1251632 = idf
This is how I have done.
I have a class NameDTO which contains all these variables. I have @Field
annotation to these fields
You might also be interested in
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/TermVectorComponent
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:39 AM, Plaatje, Patrick <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Strugling with a question I recently got from a collegue: is it possible
> to extract keywords from indexed content?
>
> In
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Raghunandan Rao <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok.
> I have another query on search.
>
> I have given two fields to be indexed = true in xml.
>
>
> required="false"/>
> required="false"/>
>
> But when I try to search on non-indexed "name" field it is able to retr
Hi Aleksander,
Thanx for clearing this up. I am confident that this is a way to explore for me
as I'm just starting to grasp the matter. Do you know why I'm not getting any
results with the query posted earlier then? It gives me the folowing only:
Instead of delivering details of th
Hi Noble Paul,
thanks for your quick response.
Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote:
>
> What i expect to happen is when you run the query
> SELECT manufacturer,id FROM product_data WHERE type='manu'
>
> you must get all the rows from the DB in the table product_data
>
Unfortunately, that's not t
I do not agree with you at all. The concept of MoreLikeThis is based on
the fundamental idea of TF-IDF weighting, and not term frequency alone.
Please take a look at:
http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_4_0/api/org/apache/lucene/search/similar/MoreLikeThis.html
As you can see, it is possible to use
Dear Partick, I had the same problem with MoreLikeThis function.
After briefly reading and analyzing the source code of moreLikeThis function
in solr, I conducted:
MoreLikeThis uses term vectors to ranks all the terms from a document
by its frequency. According to its ranking, it will start to
Ok.
I have another query on search.
I have given two fields to be indexed = true in xml.
But when I try to search on non-indexed "name" field it is able to retrieve
records. How is this possible?
-Original Message-
From: Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: We
What i expect to happen is when you run the query
SELECT manufacturer,id FROM product_data WHERE type='manu'
you must get all the rows from the DB in the table product_data
So it is likely that you get an OOM if the DB table has a lot of rows.
processor="CachedSQLEntityProcessor" is wrong
proces
I've been discussing this topic with Amit and also have some questions...
Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Amit Nithian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 2) In the example, there were two use cases, one that is like
>> query="select
>> * from Y where xid=${X.ID
nope . you cannot update a document in Solr.
You can only delete and add a new one
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Raghunandan Rao
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok. Can I update the index without deleting? I mean to update all names with
> a new name.
> In an index I have id, name, deptid as fi
Ok. Can I update the index without deleting? I mean to update all names with a
new name.
In an index I have id, name, deptid as fields. I need to update name field =
"new" where name="old".
-Original Message-
From: Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, N
yes
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Raghunandan Rao
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to update an index after I update data in the DB. I will first
> update the DB and then call deleteByQuery in Solrj and then update
> particular index. What happens to deleteByQuery method if there are
Hi All,
as an addition to my previous post, no interestingTerms are returned
when i execute the folowing url:
http://localhost:8080/solr/select/?q=id=18477975&mlt.fl=text&mlt.interes
tingTerms=list&mlt=true&mlt.match.include=true
I get a moreLikeThis list though, any thoughts?
Best,
Patri
Hi,
I need to update an index after I update data in the DB. I will first
update the DB and then call deleteByQuery in Solrj and then update
particular index. What happens to deleteByQuery method if there are
multiple ids found?
For eg, I am using deleteByQuery("12");
Can I specify field n
47 matches
Mail list logo
