On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Amit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is there any way to sort the facet values by other own ranking value
> instead
> of only count?
>
>
Facets do not have a "score" associated with them of their own. Not sure
what you mean exactly.
--
Regards,
Shalin Shekhar Man
Hi All,
Is there any way to sort the facet values by other own ranking value instead
of only count?
Thanks and Regards,
Amit
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.549 / Virus Database: 270.9.9/1804 - Release Date: 21-11-2008
18:24
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 3:10 AM, Chris Hostetter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> : > it might be worth considering a new @attribute for to indicate
> : > that they are going to be used purely as "component" fields (ie: your
> : > first-name/last-name example) and then have DIH pass all non-componen
Committed revision 719793.
Thank you for reporting this, ashok!
Koji
Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
ashok,
Hmm, this is a bug. It was accidentally introduced when SOLR-657 was
committed.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/solr/trunk/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/LuceneQParserPlugin.java?p2=%2Fl
: > I assume there is a schema definition or DTD for XML response but could not
: > find it anywhere.
: >
: > Is there one?
there was an attempt at one a while back, it got to the point where it was
mostly correct, but no one really had any specific ideas of what to do
with it (just commiting
ashok,
Hmm, this is a bug. It was accidentally introduced when SOLR-657 was
committed.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/solr/trunk/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/LuceneQParserPlugin.java?p2=%2Flucene%2Fsolr%2Ftrunk%2Fsrc%2Fjava%2Forg%2Fapache%2Fsolr%2Fsearch%2FLuceneQParserPlugin.java&p1=%
: Possible ranges are numbers (1 to 1000s) but also could include appendix
: page that include roman and alphabet characters (i, ii, iii, iv, as well as
: a, b, c, etc).
:
: It makes sense people would want to search for things between page 1 to 5
: but I cannot really see how someone would search
: There were a few comments about schema files in Mark Mail between you
: and Grant a couple of months ago, no big demand for them for the
: schema.xml file. Before I drop this would you consider taking a look at
: XSD file below for the schema.xml and perhaps submit the XSD file the
: SVN system?
I guess you may have already gone through the Solr tutorial.
Also look at http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateXmlMessages for general
description of add/delete commands
Look at the DataImportHandler which can help in indexing databases and your
custom XML -- http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHan
I've gotten Solr up and running, I can ingest the demo objects and
query them via the admin tool, so far so good. Now, how do I ingest
some basic XML, how can I pull from an existing MySQL database, what
about pulling records in via OAI? I'm assuming I need to write some
schemas for that, can som
Yep seems this is the case. I found a work-around in case anyone wants
to know. I adjusted my query to include a fq of '-myfield:1'. So
pretty much, all my data that was in there already would have had a
value of '0' for myfield so I can treat either myfield:0 or the absence
of myfield as the sa
: I've tried searching for this answer all over but have found no results
: thus far. I am trying to add a new field to my schema.xml with a
: default value of 0. I have a ton of data indexed right now and it would
: be very hard to retrieve all of the original sources to rebuild my
: index. So
: > it might be worth considering a new @attribute for to indicate
: > that they are going to be used purely as "component" fields (ie: your
: > first-name/last-name example) and then have DIH pass all non-component
: > fields along and error if undefined in the schema just like other updating
:
: I have problem with two fields. In query I am use q.op=AND but I would like
: use in two first fields OR.
: Example:
:
: iTitle:(+keyword 1 +keyword2) OR iDescription:(+keyword 1
: +keyword2)+iUser:"12345"+iType:"1"
:
: This query not work :(
someplaces in your query sting it seems like you a
Hola!
soy nueva en solr y tengo el mismo problema, necesito obtener todos los
resultados de cierta consulta y si se puede paginados, de 10 en 10, yo estoy
usando jsolr y jsp en una aplicación web, entonces no sabria donde poner la
nueva url, con el start = 10 y el rows = 10 o algo así, estoy usan
Yo no suelo usar solrj, pero creo que quiere investigar
SolrQuery.setStart() y SolrQuery.setRows(). Creo que el primero es
para indicar el numero del primero resultado que quere obtener y el
segundo es para indicar cuantos resultados quiere obtener. Si quere
todos los resultados, probablemente va a
Hola!
soy nueva en solr, lo estoy usando para mi proyecto de residencias, el
problema que tengo es similar al que dice david, necesito enviar todos los
resultados de cierta consulta al cliente, sin embargo siempre puedo obtener
solamente 10, los diez primeros, y yo necesito obtener todos, yo estoy
Since i didn't receive any response, i think i my question wasn't very clear.
If the phrase has 4 words (last will and testament florida - and will be
removed by stopwordfilter), right now solr matches docs with atleast 3 out
of those 4 words. So whats happening is last will and testament from all
On 21-Nov-08, at 3:45 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
To do it now, you'd have to switch the query parser to using the old
style wildcard (and/or prefix) query, which is slower on large
indexes and has max clause issues.
An alternative is to query for q=tele?*, which forces wildcardquery
-Mike
Have a look at the FunctionQuery stuff:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery
On Nov 20, 2008, at 4:42 PM, Lance Norskog wrote:
Is it possible to boost a document by the contents of a field? Given
the
query:
text field:value
I want to return all documents with 'text'. Documents where
On Nov 20, 2008, at 9:18 AM, Fergus McMenemie wrote:
Hello Grant,
Were you overwriting the existing index or did you also clean out the
Solr data directory, too? In other words, was it a fresh index, or
an
existing one? And was that also the case for the 22 minute time?
No in each case
I still don't understand why you want two different indexes if you want to
return the linked information each time anyways...
I would say the easiest way is just to index all data (all columns from
your views) into the index like this:
taskid - taskname - start - end - personid - deptid - ism
To do it now, you'd have to switch the query parser to using the old
style wildcard (and/or prefix) query, which is slower on large indexes
and has max clause issues.
I think I can make it work out of the box for the next release again
though. see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-825
Can you also let me know how I join two search indices in one query?
That means, in this case I have two diff search indices and I need to
join by queueId and get all the tasks in one SolrQuery. I am creating
queries in Solrj.
-Original Message-
From: Raghunandan Rao [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
The column value should be same as it is in the DB and the name value
should be same as it is in the schema.
BTW, if you are using a latest nightly all this must be fixed. The
case does not matter.
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 2:13 PM, JCodina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I tried to perform a DataIm
Ok. I got your point. So I need not require ID field in the second view.
I will hence remove required="true" in schema.xml. What I thought was
unique ID makes indexing easier or used to maintain doc.
Thanks a lot.
-Original Message-
From: Aleksander M. Stensby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, In that case, what do you want to search for? If I were you, I would
make my index consist of tasks (and I assume that is what you are trying
to do).
So why don't you just use your schema.xml as you have right now, and do
the following:
Pick a person (let's say he has person_id=42 a
Ok. There is common column in two views called queueId. I query second
view first and get all the queueids for a person. And having queueIds I
get all the ids from first view.
Sorry for missing that column earlier. I think it should make sense now.
-Original Message-
From: Aleksander M.
Hi,
i'm using solr 1.3.0 and SolrJ for my java application
I need to highlight my query words even if I use wildcards
for example
q=tele*
i need to highlight words as "television", "telephone", etc
I found this thread
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-solr-user/200704.mbox/[E
And in case that wasn't clear, the reason for it failing then would
obviously be because you define the id field with required="true", and you
try inserting a document where this field is missing...
- Aleks
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:46:10 +0100, Aleksander M. Stensby
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Ok, this brings me to the question; how are the two view's connected to
each other (since you are indexing partly view 1 and partly view 2 into a
single index structure?
If they are not at all connected I believe you have made a fundamental
mistake / misunderstand the use of your index...
I
That sounds a bit strange. Did you do the changes in the schema.xml before
starting the server? Because if you change it while it is running, it will
by default delete and replace the file (discarding any changes you make).
In other words, make sure the server is not running, make your change
View structure is:
1.
Task(id* (int), name (string), start (timestamp), end (timestamp))
2.
Team(person_id (int), deptId (int), isManager (int))
* is primary key
In schema.xml I have
id
-Original Message-
From: Aleksander M. Stensby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, Nov
Hello again. I'm getting a bit confused by your questions, and I believe
it would be easier for us to help you if you could post the field
definitions from your schema.xml and the structure of your two database
views.
ie.
table 1: (id (int), subject (string) -.--)
table 2: (category (string)
I tried to perform a DataImportHandler where the column name "user" and the
field name "User" are the same but the case of the first letter,
when performing a full import, I was getting different sorts of errors, on
that field depending on the cases of the names, I tried the four possible
combi
35 matches
Mail list logo
