It may be fine to provide that but, what other benefit can you get
which you can't get from writing a Simple DataSource in java.Script is
just a convenience , right?
--Noble
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Jon Baer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On a side note ... it would be nice if your data sou
On a side note ... it would be nice if your data source could also be
the result of a script (instead of trying to hack around it w/
JdbcDataSource) ...
Something similar to what ScriptTransformer does ...
(http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#head-27fcc2794bd71f7d727104ffc6b99e194bd
Hi Lance,
I guess I got your problem
So you wish to create docs for both entities (as suggested by Jon
Baer). So the best solution would be to create two root entities. The
first one should be the outer and write a transformer to store all the
urls into the db . The JdbcDataSource can do inserts/up
Hi Lance,
Do a full import w/o debug and let us know if my suggestion worked
(rootEntity="false" ) . If it didn't , I can suggest u something else
(Writing a Transformer )
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 8:13 AM, Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you wish to create 1 doc per inner
Hi Jon ,
Using a CachedSqlEntityProcessor is the root entity is of no use. it
must be only as good as using a SqlEntityProcessor .for classes
belonging to the package 'org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport' the
package name can be omited (for better readability).
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 8:08 AM, Jon
Hey there,
I am doing the same and I am experimenting some trouble. I get the document
data searching by term. The problem is that when I do it several times
(inside a huge for) the app starts increasing the memory use until I use
almost the whole memory...
Did u find any other way to do that?
J
Hey there,
I would like to customize my query this way:
I want to give higher boosting to the results that match the query ejecuted
between comas and less boosting to the results matching without comas. I
have it done in my own lucene app (coding straight with lucene). I am trying
to migrate to S
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 5:09 AM, George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to implement a custom sort in Solr based on a combination of
> relevance (Solr gives me it yet => score) and a custom value I've calculated
> previously for each document. I see two options:
>
> 1. Use a function query (I'm
Hi,
I want to implement a custom sort in Solr based on a combination of
relevance (Solr gives me it yet => score) and a custom value I've calculated
previously for each document. I see two options:
1. Use a function query (I'm using a DisMaxRequestHandler).
2. Create a component that set SortSpec
