It is slow each time I run it. (I test it from the Solr admin console or
from a JAVA program using the Http client).
I do not get the OOM each time.
Thx
Christophe
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Is the sorted query slow only the first time or every time you run it?
You got an OOM? What -Xmx value a
: the multi-value field has only one value for a document, the XML returned
: looks like this:
:
: 5693
:
I think you are mistaken. it will either look like this...
5693
...or it will look like this...
5693
...depending on what the value of the "version" param is in your re
I'm trying to create the boost query (bq parameter) effect with the standard
request handler. Unfortunately, going to the dismax handler isn't really an
option for me, so I'm trying to create a similar effect.
I have an integer field, 'searchTier', that sort of needs to be factored
into every qu
Is the sorted query slow only the first time or every time you run it?
You got an OOM? What -Xmx value are you using? Try increasing it.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: christophe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: solr-user@lucene
Try debugQuery=true not dubugQuery=true
Also, just include the expanded query in your email.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: prerna07 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 2:21
OK I figured it out. It's because my fl had * in it. So, I'm guessing a
re-index will remove the "word" field for good?
+ Erik for the tip :)
Matt
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Matt Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was using a field called "word" but have changed it to "spell"
Hi,
I was using a field called "word" but have changed it to "spell". Do I need
to delete this field from the index and if so, how? I'm concerned because
when I do a query like:
?q.alt=*:*&qt=dismax
I get an error saying the "word" field was not found.
Matt
I don't think that there is any outstanding work to do on this issue.
2.4.0 should be compatible with the Solr 1.3 release; simply drop the
lucene jars in solr's lib directory if you want to use the (slightly
newer) version of lucene.
-Mike
On 15-Oct-08, at 10:00 AM, Feak, Todd wrote:
T
Hi,
I'm doing some tests with Solr1.3
I have loaded around 7M documents, each with a few stored and indexed
fields.
This query: text:sometext returns the results, sorted by score in a few
milliseconds. (I display 10 out of 8747 matched documents)
This one: text:sometext;id desc takes someth
That is weird. Can you try running Lucene's CheckIndex tool on the
index: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-trunk/javadoc//org/apache/lucene/index/CheckIndex.html
It should be in the Lucene core library that is shipped w/ Solr.
On Oct 16, 2008, at 4:27 PM, Paul deGrandis wrot
See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent for how to setup
spell checking.
-Grant
On Oct 17, 2008, at 10:40 AM, sunnyfr wrote:
If I do 8180/solr/video/select?q=chiens&qt=spellchecker
I've nothing
−
0
0
chiens
false
sunnyfr wrote:
Sorry I don't get really how I can check
If I do 8180/solr/video/select?q=chiens&qt=spellchecker
I've nothing
−
0
0
chiens
false
sunnyfr wrote:
>
> Sorry I don't get really how I can check I did :
> :8180/solr/video/select?q=chiens&qt=spellchecker&cmd=rebuild
>
> I've got that:
>
> −
>
> 0
> 50
>
> rebuild
> chiens
> false
Sorry I don't get really how I can check I did :
:8180/solr/video/select?q=chiens&qt=spellchecker&cmd=rebuild
I've got that:
−
0
50
rebuild
chiens
false
Indeed I've a new file in my spellchecker1 directory, but how can I check
then.
Thanks,
goodieboy wrote:
>
> Did you send in a spellch
It's ok ! thanks,
sunnyfr wrote:
>
> I did that but nothing changed ??
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ps axf | grep java
> 23574 pts/0S+ 0:00 \_ grep java
> 23390 ?Ss 0:00 /usr/bin/jsvc -user tomcat55 -cp
> /usr/share/java/commons-daemon.jar:/usr/share/tomcat5.5/bin/bootst
Did you send in a spellcheck.build=true ?
Matt
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 7:31 AM, sunnyfr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> How come I've nothing in my spellchercker directories :
> I've updated it but I'm started from an empty data directory and :
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/data/solr/video/data#
Hi again guys, :)
Sure, even the request would be lighter but a lot, if it's one per language
because so far it looks like that :
SELECT ...
IF(video.language = 'fr', video.title, NULL) as
title_fr,
IF(video.language = 'en', video
Thanks
it was actually a problem of user in scripts.src.
Erik Hatcher wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 8, 2008, at 3:43 AM, sunnyfr wrote:
>> Just a question, I've updated solr1.2 to solr 1.3 but didn't change
>> solrconfig.xml and schema.xml
>> is that a real problem ?
>
> Personally, I'd strongly recom
Yes that was the problem..
thanks Nobble.
All this time i have been trying various possibilities with
Earlier when i removed it there was some sort of error and then i kept it as
required=false.
Now I removed it and again tried the same. It is now working fine.
So this issue is now solved.
Th
Sorry if it's a silly question but I don't get how solr can know the path
just for the commit.
Then for the data and logs It can get it by scripts.src.
sunnyfr wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Question about bin folder and multi-core.
> I would like to get really how it works.
>
> I've several core : /dat
Hi,
How come I've nothing in my spellchercker directories :
I've updated it but I'm started from an empty data directory and :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/data/solr/video/data# ls spellchecker1/
segments.gen segments_1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/data/solr/video/data# ls spellchecker2/
segments.gen segments_1
[
Sorry, my bad, a letter was before < in solr.xml multicore
thanks a lot,
ryantxu wrote:
>
> when do you get this error?
>
> Is it on startup or when you are posting xml to /update?
>
> Are there any characters in your xml files before the first "<"?
>
> ryan
>
>
> On Oct 17, 2008, at 6:14
my bad a letter was before solr.xml / multicore
sunnyfr wrote:
>
> Nop,
>
> Just when I start tomcat.
> I've checked my solrConfig.xml, nothing before the first <
> my logs are :
>
> Oct 17 13:03:32 solr-test jsvc.exec[32637]: Oct 17, 2008 1:03:32 PM
> org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader
Nop,
Just when I start tomcat.
I've checked my solrConfig.xml, nothing before the first <
my logs are :
Oct 17 13:03:32 solr-test jsvc.exec[32637]: Oct 17, 2008 1:03:32 PM
org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader createClassLoader INFO: Adding
'file:/data/solr/lib/stax-utils.jar' to Solr classl
when do you get this error?
Is it on startup or when you are posting xml to /update?
Are there any characters in your xml files before the first "<"?
ryan
On Oct 17, 2008, at 6:14 AM, sunnyfr wrote:
INFO: Adding 'file:/data/solr/lib/wstx-asl-3.2.7.jar' to Solr
classloader
Oct 17, 2008 12
INFO: Adding 'file:/data/solr/lib/wstx-asl-3.2.7.jar' to Solr classloader
Oct 17, 2008 12:03:25 PM org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter init
SEVERE: Could not start SOLR. Check solr/home property
org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Content is not allowed in prolog.
Any idea?
Thanks a lot
--
Vie
Hi,
After reading this post, I looked for in solrconfig.xml :
1
0.5
spell
spelling
But couldn't find it, just find :
false
false
1
spellcheck
Can you tel
This is to debug your problem.
remove the and run import.
just see if all the docs are shown .
If yes , then you have duplicate ids which cause some documents to be removed
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 2:01 PM, con <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The responce that i get while executing
> http://loc
Lance Norskog schrieb:
If you make a database view with the query, it is easy to examine the data you
want to index. Then, your solr import query would just pull the view. The Solr
setup file is much simpler this way.
I will try and let you know.
Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् schrieb:
the last-index_time is available only from second time onwards that is
. It expects a full-import to be done first
It knows that by the presence of dataimport.properties in the config
directory. Did you check if it is present?
yes, I did a check and the fil
The responce that i get while executing
http://localhost:8983/solr/core0/dataimport?command=full-import
shows that all the rows that are expected to be the output of that query is
getting indexed.
The count,
Indexing completed. Added/Updated: 19 documents. Deleted 0 documents.
is as expecte
Hi,
Question about bin folder and multi-core.
I would like to get really how it works.
I've several core : /data/solr/video/
/data/solr/user/
/data/solr/group/
If I put the bin folder in /data/solr/bin
And in my SolrConfig.xml for each core
how do you know that indexing is fine? does a query of *:* give all
the results you wanted?
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 3:58 PM, con <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Yes. something similar to :
>
> query="select * from USER, CUSTOMER where USER.userID = CUSTOMER.userID">
>
>
>
>
>
Yes. Something similar to :
Hi,
It doesnt seems to work, if I look in my data directory I've all this files
:
apshot.20081015172840 snapshot.20081015183901 snapshot.20081015195358
snapshot.20081015210546 snapshot.20081015224244 snapshot.20081016013035
snapshot.20081016105617
snapshot.20081015172841 snapshot.20081015
34 matches
Mail list logo
