Hm, it's hard to tell from here. Have you checked various logs for "Exception",
"ERROR", and such?
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Machisuji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 26,
Jake,
Yes, that field would have to be some kind of an analyzed field (e.g. text),
not string if you wanted that query to match "Jake is Testing" input. There
are no built-in Lucene or Solr-specific limits on field lengths. There is one
parameter called maxFieldLength in Solr's solrconfig
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 5:16 AM, jennyv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks! I've tried that but it won't return any of the fields aside
> from pki, id, and score. I've tried the wildcard and I've also tried
> providing the names of the fields (e.g., text_for_solr_t, which is the
> name of the mai
Are you sure you have the fields set to store in your schema? You
said before you know they're being saved because you can search
against them... While any field can be searched against which is set
to indexed="true", only fields set to stored="true" can actually be
retrieved for further d
But function query doesn't give access to the SOLR score, only to fields in
the index, no ?
thx
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the easiest approach might be making use of Lucene's function
> query.
>
>
> Otis
> --
> Sematext -- http://semat
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Stephen Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I do this by specifying them in the query string:
>
> fl=field_name1,field_name2,etc
>
> See here:
> http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-solr1/#searching (table 2)
Thanks! I've tried that but it won't return a
I do this by specifying them in the query string:
fl=field_name1,field_name2,etc
See here: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-solr1/#searching
(table 2)
--
Steve
On Aug 26, 2008, at 6:36 PM, jennyv wrote:
Ack. Reading the FAQ would help. :-) I've fixed the sorting issue by
u
Ack. Reading the FAQ would help. :-) I've fixed the sorting issue by
using a different analyzer. However, I'd love to get an answer on
whether there's a way to query solr to include more fields in the
results. Thanks!
I think the easiest approach might be making use of Lucene's function query.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: s d <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 1:55:38 PM
> Subject: We
I'm having trouble with sorting -- things don't return in the order
that I think they should. To look into this problem further, I thought
I'd query solr and try to display the data field in question. I tried
forming my own URL but solr wasn't returning my field. Then I tried
the admin form in case
Hello,
I was wondering how does Solr search when a field is not specified,
just a query? Say for example I got the following:
?q="Jake" AND "Test"
I have a mixture of integer, string, and text columns. Some indexed,
some stored, and some string fields copied to text fields.
Say I have a string
You can modify the schema file but you'll need to reload Solr for Solr to
see be aware of it. You can use multiCore to eliminate downtime. But at
this point you obviously don't have any data in it so I can only assume
you'll want to reload everything -- what else would you expect? This
doesn't n
On Aug 26, 2008, at 3:09 PM, Jon Drukman wrote:
Is there a way to add a field to an existing index without stopping
the server, deleting the index, and reloading every document from
scratch?
You can add a field to the schema at any time without adversely
affecting the rest of the index
Is there a way to add a field to an existing index without stopping the
server, deleting the index, and reloading every document from scratch?
-jsd-
On Aug 26, 2008, at 12:24 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
Hi Brian,
You can implement the SolrCoreAware interface which will give you
access to
the SolrCore object through the SolrCoreAware#inform method you will
need to
implement. It is called after the init method.
Shalin, that worke
you can also use queries like field:[* to Z] or field:[Z TO *]
-Mike
Jake Conk wrote:
Hello,
I was trying to figure out how to query ranges greater than and less
than. The closest solution I could find was using the range format:
field:[x TO z]
While this solution works for querying greate
Hello,
I was trying to figure out how to query ranges greater than and less
than. The closest solution I could find was using the range format:
field:[x TO z]
While this solution works for querying greater than items how would I
query all items less than 10 assuming I have some items that have a
I want to weighted average the Lucene score with an additional score i have,
i.e. (W1 * Lucene score + W2 * Other score) / (W1 + W2) .
What is the easiest way to do this?
Also, is the Lucene score normalized.
Thanks,
2008/8/26 Machisuji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> No, I just add the documents, call commit() and wait for the response.
>
> Now I made a workaround where I put each commit() in a separate thread,
> which I wait for (Thread#join(long)) and recommit the documents if
> the Thread didn't end within a given
No, I just add the documents, call commit() and wait for the response.
Now I made a workaround where I put each commit() in a separate thread,
which I wait for (Thread#join(long)) and recommit the documents if
the Thread didn't end within a given amount of time.
This way I am able to commit all d
Hi Brian,
You can implement the SolrCoreAware interface which will give you access to
the SolrCore object through the SolrCoreAware#inform method you will need to
implement. It is called after the init method.
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Brian Whitman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> I want to b
Are you using any postCommit postOptimize eventListener?
I got some problems using them, that I run on scenario where the
commit/optimize thread never ended.
2008/8/26 Machisuji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Hey.
>
> I've been working with SolR for a few days now and as long as I haven't
> worked with
OK. I put it here
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters/Kstem and
linked it from the stemming paragraph found here:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters
Cheers!
harry
-Original Message-
From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
I want to be able to store non-solr data in solr's data directory
(like solr/solr/data/stored alongside solr/solr/data/index)
The java class that sets up this data is instantiated from a
RequestHandlerBase class like:
public class StoreDataHandler extends RequestHandlerBase {
StoredData sto
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:15:21 +0300
Aleksey Gogolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> I'm new to solr and I need to make a search suggest (like google
> suggestions).
>
Hi Aleksey,
please search the archives of this list for subjects containing 'autocomplete'
or 'auto-suggest'. that sho
Hi Aleksey,
Welcome to Solr!
You should append a wildcard at the end e.g. search like "samsu*" which
should match "samsung".
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Aleksey Gogolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> I'm new to solr and I need to make a search suggest (like google
> suggestions)
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Walter Ferrara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> no problem! I've opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-728
Thanks!
>
> I do understand the fact that import should be run sequentially, the
> main issue I can foresee is a delta-import via curl in crontab, t
Hey.
I've been working with SolR for a few days now and as long as I haven't
worked with
too much data everything was alright.
However, now that I wanted to index really all data, I've got problems with
SolrJ
not returning from a call to CommonHttpSolrServers's commit().
I try to upload data fro
Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
> Hi Walter,
>
> Indeed, there's a race condition there because we didn't expect people to
> hit it concurrently. We expected that imports would be run sequentially.
>
> Thanks for noticing this. We shall add synchronization to the next release.
> Do you mind (again) op
Hello.
I'm new to solr and I need to make a search suggest (like google
suggestions).
In first approach I decided to make it in this way:
1. Script make a query to solr using words that were typed by user.
2. Then script analyse docs (which solr return) and build a suggestions.
But I confronte
Hi Walter,
Indeed, there's a race condition there because we didn't expect people to
hit it concurrently. We expected that imports would be run sequentially.
Thanks for noticing this. We shall add synchronization to the next release.
Do you mind (again) opening an issue for this? We'll attach a p
I'm using DIH and its wonderful delta-import.
I have a question: the delta-import is synchronized? multiple call to
delta imports, shouldn't result in one refused because the status is not
idle?
I've noticed however that calling multiple times in a sec the
dataimport/?command=delta-import result in
Thanks Walter. I shall work up a patch soon.
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Walter Ferrara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
> > Can you please open a JIRA issue for this? However, we may only be able
> to
> > fix this after 1.3 because a code freeze has been decided upon
Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
> Can you please open a JIRA issue for this? However, we may only be able to
> fix this after 1.3 because a code freeze has been decided upon, to release
> 1.3 asap.
>
I've open https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-726
Walter
34 matches
Mail list logo
