Hi,
What is the type of the field "name"?
Does a query like "name:ibm OR name:T63 OR name:notebook" work for you?
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:43 AM, finy finy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i use solr for 3 months, and i find some question follow:
>
> i check the solr source code, and find it uses
The computed frequency will be for the current set of results (the result of
q and fq parameters). Setting facet.mincount=1 will give you only those
terms which are present (frequency >= 1) in your results.
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Gene Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, more test
OK, more testing seems to say that if i do mincount=1, I only get
facet field values that are actually in the documents
'facet_fields':{
'title':[
'build',1,
'central',1,
:
:
for
http://localhost:8085/solr/select?q=example.com&wt=python&indent=on&facet=true&facet.field=
i use solr for 3 months, and i find some question follow:
i check the solr source code, and find it uses lucene's QueryParser to parse
user's input querystring
for example, a query like this "name:ibmT63notebook" ,solr will parse it
like 'name:"ibm T63 notebook"' , it regard this as a PhrazeQuery
I'm still learning how to use facets with Solr correctly. It seems
that you get facet counts computed over all docs in your index.
For example, I tried this on a local index I've built up for testing.
This index has urls uniquely indexed, so no two docs
have the same url value.
http://localhost:8
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:34:56 +0530
"Shalin Shekhar Mangar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually we have commit and optimize as separate request parameters
> defaulting to true for both full-import and delta-import. You can add a
> request parameter optimize=false for delta-import if you want to c
Please post the question as a separate mail with a new subject.
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 9:58 AM, finy finy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i'sorry, i am not familiar with the maillist operation.
> my question is:
>
> i check the solr source code, and find it uses lucene's QueryParser to parse
> use
i'sorry, i am not familiar with the maillist operation.
my question is:
i check the solr source code, and find it uses lucene's QueryParser to parse
user's input querystring
for example, a query like this "name:ibmT63notebook" ,solr will parse it
like 'name:"ibm T63 notebook"' , it regard this a
Actually we have commit and optimize as separate request parameters
defaulting to true for both full-import and delta-import. You can add a
request parameter optimize=false for delta-import if you want to commit but
not to optimize the index.
I've updated the wiki. Thanks for pointing it out.
On
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:14:32 +0800
"finy finy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i use solr for 3 months, and i find some question follow:
Please do not hijack mail threads.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thread_hijacking
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
"Ask not what's inside
i use solr for 3 months, and i find some question follow:
i check the solr source code, and find it uses lucene's QueryParser to parse
user's input querystring
for example, a query like this "name:ibmT63notebook" ,solr will parse it
like 'name:"ibm T63 notebook"' , it regard this as a PhrazeQuery
Hi again,
I see in the DIH wiki page :
[...]
full-import [..]
commit: (default 'true'). Tells whether to commit+optimize after the operation
[...]
but nothing for delta-import... I think it would be useful , a 'commit'
(default=true) , 'optimize' (default=false) for the delta-import - these sh
On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 20:22:26 +0530
"Shalin Shekhar Mangar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If it is only SpellCheckComponent that you are interested in, then see
> SOLR-622.
>
> You can add this to your SCC config to rebuild SCC after every commit:
> true
ah great stuff , thanks Shalin.
B
I like it quite a bit actually. I don't have anything construtive
though, it looks great already. Nice blend of simplicity and flash.
Could certainly take my vote.
- Mark
On Aug 17, 2008, at 7:02 PM, "Luká? Vl?ek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi,
My initial draft of Solr logo can be fou
Hi,
My initial draft of Solr logo can be found here:
http://picasaweb.google.com/lukas.vlcek/Solr
The reason why I haven't attached it to SOLR-84 for now is that this is just
draft and not final design (there are a lot of unfinished details). I would
like to get some feedback before I spend more t
Thanks a lot for the reply.
I thought, might be a good idea to sort of override operator names, same
like stop words, stems, etc. I guess I'd need to parse the query string?
As for keeping state between requests, there's always going to be some
state going in order to have a drill-down sessio
Hello,
After a Solr query, I always get the fields back in alphabetical order,
no matter how I insert them.
Is this the normal behaviour?
This is when adding the document...
ch.tsr.esg.domain.ProgramCollection[id: 1]
collection
Bac à sable
name="collection.url">
OK Thanks. I will have another look at faceting again.
gene
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 3:48 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Gene,
>
> Solr supports this (faceted search) out-of-the-box.
>
> Take a look at:
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters
> http://wik
And also is there any way to read spellings from a file spellings.txt by
using SpellCheckerRequestHandler.
Please suggest.
Thanks,
Anshul
anshuljohri wrote:
>
> Ok Thats fine.
> Also i can switch to solr 1.3 but i think stable version solr 1.3 is not
> publicly launched yet.
> Isn't it?
>
>
Ok Thats fine.
Also i can switch to solr 1.3 but i think stable version solr 1.3 is not
publicly launched yet.
Isn't it?
Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
>
> Then you are stuck with SpellCheckerRequestHandler.
>
> You can always issue two requests -- one to dismax and another to spell
> checker.
Then you are stuck with SpellCheckerRequestHandler.
You can always issue two requests -- one to dismax and another to spell
checker.
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 11:32 PM, anshuljohri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> But I am using solr 1.2 which doesn't have all the required classes for
> SpellCheckCo
But I am using solr 1.2 which doesn't have all the required classes for
SpellCheckComponent.
Is there any way to use this component in solr 1.2?
Please help me out its very urgent.
Thanks,
Anshul
Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
>
> The SpellCheckerRequestHandler is now deprecated with Solr 1.3 an
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 10:20 PM, Pierre Auslaender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> 1/ Is it possible to localise query operator names without writing code?
> For instance, I'd like to issue queries with French operator names, e.g. ET
> (instead of AND), OU (instead of OR), etc.
No, your application
Hi Gene,
Solr supports this (faceted search) out-of-the-box.
Take a look at:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrFacetingOverview
It will give you words with their frequencies for the fields you select.
However, it will give you all the facets (tags)
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> hi guys,
> First of all, thanks for DIH - it's great :)
>
> One thing I noticed during my tests ( nightly, 2008-08-16) is that, if the
> DB is not available during SOLR startup time, the whole core won't
> initialise .-
If it is only SpellCheckComponent that you are interested in, then see
SOLR-622.
You can add this to your SCC config to rebuild SCC after every commit:
true
Looks like the changes did not make it to the SCC wiki page. I shall update
it.
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 7:18 PM, Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL P
Guys + gals,
just a question of form - would DIH itself be the right place to implement a
"URLS to call after successfully completing a DIH full or partial load" - for
example, to rebuild spellchecker when new items have been added? Or should
that be part of my external process (cron -> shell
hi guys,
First of all, thanks for DIH - it's great :)
One thing I noticed during my tests ( nightly, 2008-08-16) is that, if the DB
is not available during SOLR startup time, the whole core won't initialise .-
the error is shown below.
I was wondering,
1) would it be possible to have DIH bomb o
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 23:36:32 +1000
Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi :)
> I'm trying to use SAXON instead of the default XSLT parser. I was pretty sure
> i
> had it running fine on 1.2, but when I repeated the same steps (as per the
> wiki) on latest nightly build, i cannot see any
29 matches
Mail list logo
