Hi Ranjeet,
If you are using Solr 1.2 then you must use the step given in the wiki link
else you can also upgrade to Solr 1.3 nightly build.
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Ranjeet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have refer the same section, I mean "
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solrj#h
Hi,
I have refer the same section, I mean
"http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solrj#head-12c26b2d7806432c88b26cf66e236e9bd6e91849
" and wrote a client to index the document, I am getting follwoing
exception. I am new to Solr, Please help me, If I will switch to Solr1.3
from Solr1.2, can I resolve thi
If you are using SolrJ with Solr1.2 , refer the section
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solrj#head-12c26b2d7806432c88b26cf66e236e9bd6e91849
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Ranjeet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At present its Solr1.2.. Is there any defference in indexing of document in
> Sol
Hi,
At present its Solr1.2.. Is there any defference in indexing of document in
Solr1.2 or Solr1.3, If we plan to migrate from solr1.2 to Solr1.3 then what
are the changing required?
regards,
Ranjeet
- Original Message -
From: "Noble Paul ??? ??" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Se
*Excellent* so a custom QueryComponent it is.
The Solr score doesn't factor in too much - our search needs are modest -
just does it contain the keyword (or variants, stems etc) or not. So the
query trims down from ~100M to 10-1. That way the more expensive
filtering operates at the smaller
: 1. Query the index for entries matching keyword.
: 2. remove any entries that are below a threshold score from the external
: system
what do you need to sort by? .. if it's the threshold score from your
external system, you have no way of avoiding a call out to your external
system for every
: Should this refer to facet.mincount instead of facet.limit?
: "The default is true if facet.limit is greater than 0, false otherwise."
No ... if you are limiting the number of total facet constraints you are
interested in to N, then we assume you want to sort them and get the
highest N. (as
Funtick wrote:
>
>
> Britske wrote:
>>
>> - Rows in solr represent productcategories. I will have up to 100k of
>> them.
>> - Each product category can have 10k products each. These are encoded as
>> the 10k columns / fields (all 10k fields are int values)
>>
>
> You are using multivalued
I'm still trying to filter my search results with external data. I have ~100
million documents in the index. I want to use the power of lucene to knock
that index down to 10-100 with keyword searching and a few other regular
query terms. With that smaller subset I'd like to apply a filter based
Verify that schema.xml and your document fields are in-sync...
Your stacktrace looks strange...
NamedListCodec.unmarshal(NamedListCodec.java:86) - where is
java.lang.Long?
Quoting Ranjeet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Shalin,
I have written Client to index the document, but unfortunatly getti
Hi Rakesh,
Solr ships with a set of collection distribution scripts (rsync based) which
can be used to setup master-slave replication. I believe most people use
them for transferring index from master to slaves and use separate local
filesystems on their servers.
Take a look at http://wiki.apache
I use the snapshooter with rsync
2008/7/29 Rakesh Godhani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> After Matthew's comment I was thinking about putting them both behind a
> load
> balancer, with the LB directing all traffic to one until it fails and then
> kick over to the other one.
>
> In your architectures I'm g
Funtick wrote:
>
>
> Britske wrote:
>>
>> - Rows in solr represent productcategories. I will have up to 100k of
>> them.
>> - Each product category can have 10k products each. These are encoded as
>> the 10k columns / fields (all 10k fields are int values)
>>
>
> You are using multivalued
Britske wrote:
>
> - Rows in solr represent productcategories. I will have up to 100k of
> them.
> - Each product category can have 10k products each. These are encoded as
> the 10k columns / fields (all 10k fields are int values)
>
You are using multivalued fields, you are not using 10k fie
is the server Solr1.2 or Solr1.3?
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:57 PM, Ranjeet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Shalin,
>
> I have written Client to index the document, but unfortunatly getting an
> exception. I have attached source code of client and exception, please guide
> me where I am doing mista
Hi Shalin,
I have written Client to index the document, but unfortunatly getting an
exception. I have attached source code of client and exception, please guide
me where I am doing mistake. getting "java.lang.ClassCastException:
java.lang.Long"
Thanks & Regards,
Ranjeet
- Original Mess
Hi Fuad,
Funtick wrote:
>
>
> Britske wrote:
>>
>> When performing these queries I notice a big difference between qTime
>> (which is mostly in the 15-30 ms range due to caching) and total time
>> taken to return the response (measured through SolrJ's elapsedTime),
>> which takes between 500
Britske wrote:
>
> When performing these queries I notice a big difference between qTime
> (which is mostly in the 15-30 ms range due to caching) and total time
> taken to return the response (measured through SolrJ's elapsedTime), which
> takes between 500-1600 ms.
> Documents have a lot of st
I'm looking to incorporate an external calculation in Solr/Lucene search
results. I'd like to write queries that filter and sort on the value of
this "virtual field". The value of the field is actually calculated at
runtime based on a remote call to an external system. My Solr queries will
incl
Hi Shalin and Erik,
DisMax works for me.
--Thanks and Regards
Vaijanath
Erik Hatcher wrote:
On Jul 30, 2008, at 9:17 AM, Vaijanath N. Rao wrote:
Hi Solr-users,
I have few fields in solr, for example let name them f1,f2,f3 of
which f3 is set a default field.
We have different boost for the d
On Jul 30, 2008, at 9:17 AM, Vaijanath N. Rao wrote:
Hi Solr-users,
I have few fields in solr, for example let name them f1,f2,f3 of
which f3 is set a default field.
We have different boost for the different fields. What I need is if
someone types in a query let say x. I want solr to rank
If you use DisMax ( http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMaxRequestHandler ), then
you can set the "qf" parameter in solrconfig.xml to all three fields.
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 6:47 PM, Vaijanath N. Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi Solr-users,
>
> I have few fields in solr, for example let name them
Hi Solr-users,
I have few fields in solr, for example let name them f1,f2,f3 of which
f3 is set a default field.
We have different boost for the different fields. What I need is if
someone types in a query let say x. I want solr to rank the documents
based on how x appeared on all the fields
Hi Ranjeet,
You can use Solrj which is a java client for Solr.
See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solrj for more details.
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Ranjeet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In our case Application and Solr are running in different server in
> different system. I am trying
Hi,
In our case Application and Solr are running in different server in different
system. I am trying to prepare the Document from Application to save xml
document in solr context and indexing the same document from our Application.
Any one has idea, how to save in different IP and how to index
Currently, I can't say what the data actualle represents but the analogy of
t
Mike Klaas wrote:
>
> On 28-Jul-08, at 11:16 PM, Britske wrote:
>
>>
>> That sounds interesting. Let me explain my situation, which may be a
>> variant
>> of what you are proposing. My documents contain more than
26 matches
Mail list logo
