On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 08:37:35 +0200
Brian Carmalt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is a plugin for jetty: http://webtide.com/eclipse. Insert this as
> and update site and let eclipse install the plugin for you You can then
> start the jetty server from eclipse and debug it.
Thanks Brian, good i
Hello Beto,
There is a plugin for jetty: http://webtide.com/eclipse. Insert this as
and update site and let eclipse install the plugin for you You can then
start the jetty server from eclipse and debug it.
Brian.
Am Mittwoch, den 25.06.2008, 12:48 +1000 schrieb Norberto Meijome:
> On Tue, 24 J
it is batchSize="-1" not fetchSize. Or keep it to a very small value.
--Noble
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:31 AM, Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> DIH streams rows one by one.
> set the fetchSize="-1" this might help. It may make the indexing a bit
> slower but memory consumptio
DIH streams rows one by one.
set the fetchSize="-1" this might help. It may make the indexing a bit
slower but memory consumption would be low.
The memory is consumed by the jdbc driver. try tuning the -Xmx value for the VM
--Noble
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 8:05 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
<[EMAIL PRO
ISOLatin1AccentFilterFactory works quite well for us. It solves our basic
euro-text keyboard searching problem, where "protege" should find protégé.
("protege" with two accents.)
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 4:05 PM
To: sol
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:17:58 -0700
Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> also, check the LukeRequestHandler
>
> if there is a document you think *should* match, you can see what
> tokens it has actually indexed...
right, I will look into that a bit more.
I am actually using the lukeall.
Setting the batchSize to 1 would mean that the Jdbc driver will keep
1 rows in memory *for each entity* which uses that data source (if
correctly implemented by the driver). Not sure how well the Sql Server
driver implements this. Also keep in mind that Solr also needs memory to
index docum
also, check the LukeRequestHandler
if there is a document you think *should* match, you can see what
tokens it has actually indexed...
On Jun 24, 2008, at 7:12 PM, Norberto Meijome wrote:
hi,
I'm trying to understand why a search on a field tokenized with the
nGram
tokenizer, with minGram
hi,
I'm trying to understand why a search on a field tokenized with the nGram
tokenizer, with minGramSize=n and maxGramSize=m doesn't find any matches for
queries of length (in characters) of n+1..m (n works fine).
analysis.jsp shows that it SHOULD match, but /select doesn't bring anything
back. (
This is a bug in MySQL. Try setting the Fetch Size the Statement on
the connection to Integer.MIN_VALUE.
See http://forums.mysql.com/read.php?39,137457 amongst a host of other
discussions on the subject. Basically, it tries to load all the rows
into memory, the only alternative is to set
I'm trying to load ~10 million records into Solr using the DataImportHandler.
I'm running out of memory (java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space) as
soon as I try loading more than about 5 million records.
Here's my configuration:
I'm connecting to a SQL Server database using the sqljdbc driv
: Subject: Can I specify the default operator at query time ?
: In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack
Thread Hijacking on Mailing Lists
When starting a new discussion on a mailing list, please do not reply to
an existing message, instead start a fresh
I have an index that I eventually want to rebuild so I can set
compressed=true on a couple of fields. It's not really practical to rebuild
the whole thing right now, though. If I change my schema.xml to set
compressed=true and then keep adding new data to the existing index, will
this corrupt the i
: I've seen mention of these filters:
:
:
:
Are you asking because you saw these in Robert Haschart's reply to your
previous question? I think those are custom Filters that he has in his
project ... not open source (but i may be wrong)
they are certainly not something that comes out of t
: I am new in SOLR 1.2, configured Admin GUI. Facing problem in using
: this. could you pls help me out to configure the nex.
the admin GUI isn't really a place where you configure Solr. It's a way
to see the status of things -- configuration is done via config files.
have you con through t
Norberto Meijome wrote:
ok well let's say that i can live without john/jon in the short term.
what i really need today is a case insensitive wildcard search with
literal matching (no fancy stemming. bobby is bobby, not bobbi.)
what are my options?
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokeniz
Shalin:
> The index directory location is being created inside the current working
> directory. We should change that. I've opened SOLR-604 and attached a patch
> which fixes this.
I updated from nightly build to incorporate your fix and it works
perfectly, now building the spell indexes in solr/
Hi,
Im curious, is there a spot / patch for the latest on Nutch / Solr
integration, Ive found a few pages (a few outdated it seems), it would
be nice (?) if it worked as a DataSource type to DataImportHandler,
but not sure if that fits w/ how it works. Either way a nice contrib
patch the
Ok, I got your point.
DataImportHandler currently creates documents and adds them one-by-one to
Solr. A commit/optimize is called once after all documents are finished. If
a document fails to add due to any exception then the import fails.
You can still achieve the functionality you want by setti
I do want to import all documents. My understanding of the way things work,
correct me if I'm wrong, is that there can be a certain number of documents
included in a single atomic update. Instead of having all my 16 Million
documents be part of a single update (that could more easily fail being
hi all :)
last week I reworked an older patch for SOLR-14
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14
this functionality is actually fairly important for our ongoing
migration to solr, so I'd really love to get SOLR-14 into 1.3. but
open-source being what it is, my super-important featur
Hi,
I'm having problems with the patch.
With this schema.xml:
>
If I send documents with a content smaller than 3 I have an exception
during the indexing. If I change the maxLength to, for example, 30 the
documents that before gave the exception are now indexed correctly.
The except
I've just uploaded a new patch which applies cleanly on the trunk. Thanks!
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 7:35 PM, Jon Baer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems the new patch @ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-469 is
> x2 the size but turns out the patch itself might be bad?
>
> Ie, it dumps
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:34:44 +0100
Dave Searle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am currently storing the thread id within the message index, however,
> although this would allow me to sort, it doesn't help with the grouping of
> threads based on relevancy. See the idea is to index message data in
climbingrose wrote:
Here is how I did it (the code is from memory so it might not be correct
100%):
private boolean hasAccents;
private Token filteredToken;
public final Token next() throws IOException {
if (hasAccents) {
hasAccents = false;
return filteredToken;
}
Token t = input.nex
where you are going,
any road will get you there.
I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet.
Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been
Warned.
__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of vi
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:04:24 +0100
Dave Searle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At the moment I have an index of forum messages (each message being a
> separate doc). Results are displayed on a per message basis, however, I would
> like to group the results via their thread. Apart from using a facet
randomly monitor
> outgoing
> and incoming emails and
> other telecommunications on its email and telecommunications systems. By
> replying to this email you give
> your consent to such monitoring. Copyright in this e-mail and any attachments
> created by Magicalia Media
> belon
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 09:10:58 +1000
Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 05:33:49 -0700 (PDT)
> Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > When you add &debugQuery=true to the request, what does your query look
> > like after parsing?
hi Otis
Here is how I did it (the code is from memory so it might not be correct
100%):
private boolean hasAccents;
private Token filteredToken;
public final Token next() throws IOException {
if (hasAccents) {
hasAccents = false;
return filteredToken;
}
Token t = input.next();
String filte
I don't know if SOLR-139 will make it into 1.3, but from your brief
description, I'd say you might want to consider a different schema for your
data. Stuffing thread messages in the same doc that represents a thread may
not be the best choice. Of course, you may have good reasons for doing tha
It seems the new patch @ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/
SOLR-469 is x2 the size but turns out the patch itself might be bad?
Ie, it dumps build.xml twice, is it just me?
Thanks.
- Jon
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 04:54:46 -0700 (PDT)
Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One tokenizer is followed by filters. I think this all might be a bit
> clearer if you read the chapter about Analyzers in Lucene in Action if you
> have a copy. I think if you try to break down that "the re
Hi,
Does anyone know if SOLR-139 (Support updateable/modifiable documents) will
make it back into the 1.3 release? I'm looking for a way to append data to a
multivalued field in a document over a period of time (in which the document
represents a forum thread and the multivalued field represe
One tokenizer is followed by filters. I think this all might be a bit clearer
if you read the chapter about Analyzers in Lucene in Action if you have a copy.
I think if you try to break down that "the result of all this passed to " into
something more concrete and real you will see how things
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.XMLResponseParser
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Ranjeet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is any class is available in SOLR API to parse the response XML?
>
> Regards,
> Ranjeet
--
--Noble Paul
Hi,
is any class is available in SOLR API to parse the response XML?
Regards,
Ranjeet
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 00:14:57 -0700
Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> best docs are here:
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters
yes, I've been reading that already , thanks :)
>
> > - If I define 2 tokenizers in a fieldtype, only the first one is
> > applied, t
hi everyone,
if I define a field as
On Jun 24, 2008, at 12:07 AM, Norberto Meijome wrote:
hi all,
( I'm using 1.3 nightly build from 15th June 08.)
Is there some documentation about how analysers + tokenizers are
applied in
fields ? In particular, my question :
best docs are here:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersToken
hi all,
( I'm using 1.3 nightly build from 15th June 08.)
Is there some documentation about how analysers + tokenizers are applied in
fields ? In particular, my question :
- If I define 2 tokenizers in a fieldtype, only the first one is applied, the
other is ignored. Is that because the 2nd tok
41 matches
Mail list logo
