Hi Mike,
Just curious to know the use-case here. Why do you want to limit updates to
100 instead of importing all documents?
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:23 AM, mike segv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That fixed it.
>
> If I'm inserting millions of documents, how do I control docs/update? E.g.
>
Just extend XPathEntityProcessor override nextRow() after 100
return null. Use it as your processor
--Noble
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just extend XPathEntityProcessor override nextRow() after 100 . Use
> it as your processor
> retu
Just extend XPathEntityProcessor override nextRow() after 100 . Use
it as your processor
return null;
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:23 AM, mike segv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That fixed it.
>
> If I'm inserting millions of documents, how do I control docs/update? E.g.
> if there are 50K docs
That fixed it.
If I'm inserting millions of documents, how do I control docs/update? E.g.
if there are 50K docs per file, I'm thinking that I should probably code up
my own DataSource that allows me to stipulate docs/update. Like say, 100
instead of 50K. Does this make sense?
Mike
Noble Pau
hi ,
You have not registered any datasources . the second entity needs a datasource.
Remove the dataSource="null" and add a name for the second entity
(good practice). No need for baseDir attribute for second entity .
See the modified xml added below
--Noble
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008
On 23-Jun-08, at 7:05 PM, Norberto Meijome wrote:
Hi all,
I'm curious , what is the cost (memory / processing time @ load?
performance hit ? ) of having several unused fieldTypes defined in
schema.xml ?
Affects startup time only, likely non-measurable.
-Mike
Hi all,
I'm curious , what is the cost (memory / processing time @ load? performance
hit ? ) of having several unused fieldTypes defined in schema.xml ?
cheers,
B
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
"Egotism is the anesthetic that dulls the pain of stupidity."
Frank Leahy
I'm trying to use the fileListEntityProcessor to add some xml documents to a
solr index. I'm running a nightly version of solr-1.3 with SOLR-469 and
SOLR-563. I've been able to successfuly run the slashdot httpDataSource
example. My data-config.xml file loads without errors. When I attempt the
thanks a bunch.
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 4:39 AM, Otis Gospodnetic <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Cam,
>
> Yes, the various other formats are for responses only, as far as I'm aware.
>
> Otis
> --
> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>
>
> - Original Message
> > F
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 05:33:49 -0700 (PDT)
Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> When you add &debugQuery=true to the request, what does your query look like
> after parsing?
>
>
BTW, I've tested same data + similar config using EdgeNGramTokenizer and this
works properly -
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:23:14 -0700
Jon Drukman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ok well let's say that i can live without john/jon in the short term.
> what i really need today is a case insensitive wildcard search with
> literal matching (no fancy stemming. bobby is bobby, not bobbi.)
>
> what ar
Hmm, if I add:
solr.FileBasedSpellChecker
file
spellings.txt
UTF-8
./spellcheckerFile
To the examples declaration with the spellings.txt in the working
directory, it works for me.
Did you see any exceptions in your log?
On Jun 21, 2008, at 5:28 PM, Ronal
Inline below
On Jun 21, 2008, at 5:28 PM, Ronald K. Braun wrote:
2. I'm having difficulty getting the FileBasedSpellChecker to work --
probably something silly on my part but given the above I thought
there might be container differences that haven't been vetted. Here
is my config:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 05:33:49 -0700 (PDT)
Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> When you add &debugQuery=true to the request, what does your query look like
> after parsing?
Hi Otis,
sorry, i should have sent this before too.
With minGramSize = 3 , same data, clean server star
Erik Hatcher wrote:
No, because the original data is Bobby Gaza, so
Bobby* would match, but not bobby*. "string" type (in the example
schema, to be clear) does effectively no analysis, leaving the original
string indexed as-is, case and all.
[...]
stemming and wildcard term queries aren't
On Jun 23, 2008, at 4:45 PM, Jon Drukman wrote:
Erik Hatcher wrote:
Jon,
You provided a lot of nice details, thanks for helping us help you :)
The one missing piece is the definition of the "text" field type.
In Solr's _example_ schema, "bobby" gets analyzed (stemmed) to
"bobbi"[1]. Whe
Erik Hatcher wrote:
Jon,
You provided a lot of nice details, thanks for helping us help you :)
The one missing piece is the definition of the "text" field type. In
Solr's _example_ schema, "bobby" gets analyzed (stemmed) to
"bobbi"[1]. When you query for bobby*, the query parser is not ru
Jon,
You provided a lot of nice details, thanks for helping us help you :)
The one missing piece is the definition of the "text" field type. In
Solr's _example_ schema, "bobby" gets analyzed (stemmed) to
"bobbi"[1]. When you query for bobby*, the query parser is not
running an analyzer
When I search with q=bobby I get the following record:
2008-06-23T07:06:40Z
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/117/...
9
Bobby Gaza
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When I search with bobby* I get nothing.
When I search with steve* I get "Steve Ballmer" and "Steve Jobs"...
What's going on?
On Jun 23, 2008, at 8:16 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was doing something similar to your solution to have better
searching
times.
I download you patch but I have a problem in one class. I'm not sure
if I'm
doing something wrong but if I what to compile the proyect I must
change in
In
Could the commit operation be adapted to just have the searchers aware
of new stored content in a particular document?
e.g.
With the understanding that queries for newly indexed fields in this
document will not return this newly added document, but a query for
the document by its id will r
Hi,
When you add &debugQuery=true to the request, what does your query look like
after parsing?
Otis--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, June 23
Hi Nicolas,
I was doing something similar to your solution to have better searching
times.
I download you patch but I have a problem in one class. I'm not sure if I'm
doing something wrong but if I what to compile the proyect I must change in
IndexSchema:
//private Similarity similarity;
Thanks, I had tried mm (through SolrJ) some time ago but it did not seem to
work. I will look into it more carefully - the problem maybe related to SolrJ.
Nikhil
- Original Message
From: Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Monday, 23 June, 2008 5:15:
dismax is a different sort of parser, where AND/OR doesn't really make
sense exactly. The mm (minimum match) parameter for dismax can be
used to set things to be fully OR (mm=0) or fully AND (mm=100%)
Erik
On Jun 23, 2008, at 6:27 AM, Nikhil Chhaochharia wrote:
I think this works
I think this works only for StandardRequestHandler. Any way of doing it in
DisMaxRequestHandler ?
Nikhil
- Original Message
From: Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Monday, 23 June, 2008 3:24:13 PM
Subject: Re: Can I specify the default operator at
Thanks !!!
it'll save me great time !
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Can I specify the default operator at query time ?
> Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 05:54:13 -0400
>
>
> On Jun 23, 2008, at 5:42 AM, Pierre-Yves LANDRON wrote:
> > Is there a way to trans
On Jun 23, 2008, at 5:42 AM, Pierre-Yves LANDRON wrote:
Is there a way to transgress the default operator defined in
solrConfig for a particular query, and for this query only (a query-
specific option) ?
Yes, you can specify the q.op=AND or q.op=OR per Solr request.
Erik
Hello,
Is there a way to transgress the default operator defined in solrConfig for a
particular query, and for this query only (a query-specific option) ?
Thanks,
P-Y Landron
_
Discover the new Windows Vista
http://search.msn.com/r
29 matches
Mail list logo
