On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 11:25 PM, Walter Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I've worked with the Basis products. Solid, good support.
> Last time I talked to them, they were working on hooking
> them into Lucene.
>
i don't know basis product. but i know google use it and in china,
google.cnno
That's good to know, I will get the 1.6.0_3 version of JDK and try it out.
Do you guys have any comments on my other questions? Any help is greatly
appreciated!! Thanks!
-Gaku
Yonik Seeley wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:30 PM, Gaku Mak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I used the admin GU
hi Grégoire,
I could not find an obvious problem . This is expected if the response
is not written by BinaryResponseWriter .
Could you apply the attached patch and see if you get the same error?
. This patch is not a solution. It is just to diagnose the problem.
--Noble
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 3
Grégoire,
I took a quick look at SearchHandler:242, but it looks like figuring out where
this class cast exception came from would require debugging (which you may have
to do on your end). There is no patch to apply for distributed search --
what's in the trunk already has distributed search f
Gaku,
But what's this then:
>> JVM version:
>>java version "1.7.0"
>> IcedTea Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0-b21)
>> IcedTea 64-Bit Server VM (build 1.7.0-b21, mixed mode)
Get the JVM from Sun. Also, why do you have autoCommit on if all you are
testing is indexing? I'd turn that of
I have a situation where it would be beneficial to issue queries in a filter
that is called during analysis. In a nutshell, I have an index of places
that includes possible abbreviations. And I want to query this index during
analysis to convert user-entered places to "standardized" places. So i
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:00 PM, Dallan Quass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I'm loading say 80-90% of the fields 80-90% of the time, and I don't have
> any large compressed text fields, is it safe to say that I'm probably better
> off to turn off lazy field loading?
Yes, as long as the 10-20% a
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:30 PM, Gaku Mak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I used the admin GUI to get the java info.
> java.vm.specification.vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc.
Well, your original email listed IcedTea... but that is mostly Sun
code, so maybe that's why the vendor is still listed as Sun.
If I'm loading say 80-90% of the fields 80-90% of the time, and I don't have
any large compressed text fields, is it safe to say that I'm probably better
off to turn off lazy field loading?
Thanks,
--dallan
Hi,
Id like to use elevate.xml and the component to simulate a GSA
"KeyMatch" function (ie type in A get B back always) but it seems the
elements are not marked that they have been elevated. Is there any
other way to accomplish something like that w/o having to plug a Map
into my SolrJ c
I used the admin GUI to get the java info.
java.vm.specification.vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc.
Any suggestion? Thanks a lot for your help!!
-Gaku
Yonik Seeley wrote:
>
> Not sure why you would be getting an OOM from just indexing, and with
> the 1.5G heap you've given the JVM.
> Have you tr
Not sure why you would be getting an OOM from just indexing, and with
the 1.5G heap you've given the JVM.
Have you tried Sun's JVM?
-Yonik
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 7:35 PM, gaku113 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all Solr users/developers/experts,
>
> I have the following scenario and I apprecia
On 27-May-08, at 3:16 PM, Phillip Farber wrote:
Hi all,
I've been looking without success for a simple explanation of the
effect of omitNorms=false for a text field. Can someone point me to
the relevant doc?
The length of the field, as well as field and document boosts, will
not affec
Hi all Solr users/developers/experts,
I have the following scenario and I appreciate any advice for tuning my solr
master server.
I have a field in my schema that would index (but not stored) about ~1
ids for each document. This field is expected to govern the size of the
document. Each
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Daniel Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a simple way to query the entire dataset? I want to be able to
> iterate through every document in the index.
q=*:*&start=0&rows=100
q=*:*&start=100&rows=100
etc
You could specify a very large rows, but it's pro
Is there a simple way to query the entire dataset? I want to be able to iterate
through every document in the index.
Thanks,
Daniel
Hi,
I've tried several times to put solr distributed search capabilities at work
but failed each time : the ant building of solr-1.3's trunk doesn't bring
any errros, but after deploying the obtained war in tomcat and trying a
request on solr with the 'shards' parameter on, I keep on getting this
What about usgin dynamic fields to get this job done? Of course, it would
turn your queries a little sharper.
2008/5/27 sunil sarje <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi Alan,
>
> This is very common problem that every app would face while enabling the
> application search using any kind of search engine t
If you want to have some categories before another ones, but the other
categories sorted alphabeticaly, you could create another field on your
index like cat_priority and put numerical values, so you can sort by this
field and by secondarily by your category name.
2008/5/27 anuvenk <[EMAIL PROTECT
Well,
One solution that I can see for this problem is having different indexes for
each language.
2008/5/28 Uwe Klosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Nice idea. I'll look into that, too.
>
> Thanks
> Uwe
>
> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 10:34 PM, Chris Hostetter <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > : I t
On Wednesday 28 May 2008 01:37:57 Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> If you have tokenized fields of variable size and you want the field length
> to affect the relevance score, then you do not want to omit norms.
> Omitting norms is good for fields where length is of no importance (e.g.
> gender="Male" vs
On May 28, 2008, at 10:41 AM, Bram de Jong wrote:
a new user here. I will be using solr to power the search over at
freesound ( http://freesound.iua.upf.edu ).
Welcome! Cool use of Solr too.
1. I have a minor remark about the inconsistencies in the
query-parameter definitions... Sometimes m
hello all,
a new user here. I will be using solr to power the search over at
freesound ( http://freesound.iua.upf.edu ).
been experimenting with solr and it's damned cool :)
here we go:
1. I have a minor remark about the inconsistencies in the
query-parameter definitions... Sometimes multiple
Well,
It surely comes on the example, as I got this problem all times I get the
example, and I have to remove the file multicore.xml or I get the error.
2008/5/28 Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> : I got this problem some time ago. Solr comes configured as multicore and
> you
> : running
On May 28, 2008, at 2:34 AM, Karl Wettin wrote:
It would be perfect if all I had to do was to define a couple of
facet fields, a default text query field and some title/body/class
type to render the results.
Is there such a formula 1A JSP/servlet (or PHP) user interface for
Solr? Perhaps
I think if we even just had a simple search box on the admin landing
page that showed facets would be cool. The current admin landing page
is a bit silly currently.
On May 28, 2008, at 2:34 AM, Karl Wettin wrote:
It would be perfect if all I had to do was to define a couple of
facet field
I am the beginer of the solr.
I am studing solr-1.2.0 now, ^_^
在 08-5-28，Shalin Shekhar Mangar<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 写道：
> Which version of Solr were you using previously?
>
> 2008/5/28 Eason. Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I update my solr to the latest trunk yestoday
> > some error shows when I start
Ok, I see you're getting a OutOfMemoryError. That has nothing to do
with lucene changes. Try increasing your JVM heap sizes.
2008/5/28 Shalin Shekhar Mangar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Which version of Solr were you using previously?
>
> 2008/5/28 Eason. Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> I update my solr to
Which version of Solr were you using previously?
2008/5/28 Eason. Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I update my solr to the latest trunk yestoday
> some error shows when I start it.
> It seems that Lucene2.4 is not compatible with the former one
> 2008-5-28 14:50:05 org.apache.solr.common.SolrException l
Hi Jack,
2008/5/28 Jack Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thanks for your suggestions. I have now tried installing Solr on two
> different machines. On one machine I installed the Ubuntu solr-tomcat5.5
> package, and on the other I simply dropped "solr.war"
> into /var/lib/tomcat5.5/webapps
>
> Both ma
Nice idea. I'll look into that, too.
Thanks
Uwe
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 10:34 PM, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> : I think Solr should support syntax like "sort=title_sv asc locale:sv",
> : minimally including the language, but possibly also the country
> : component of the local
I've been thinking about that in similar ways. I'll have look into it.
Thanks
Uwe
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 9:06 PM, Steven A Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Uwe,
>
> On 05/26/2008 at 8:43 AM, Uwe Klosa wrote:
> > We're using Solr 1.3 in our application and we have an index
> > that contains
32 matches
Mail list logo
