I have a hard time understanding the synonyms behaviour..especially because i
don't have the syn filter at index time.
If i have this synonym at index time
Alternative Sentence,Probation before Judgement,Pretrial Diversion
does all occurrence of 'alternative sentence' also get indexed as 'proba
Hey Peter - if you could submit your changes as an svn patch, we could apply
the update much faster.
thanks,
jeff
On Jan 23, 2008 2:42 AM, Peter Thygesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wrote a small client in .Net which query Solr and dumps the result on
> screen.. fantastic low-tech.. ;)
>
>
On Jan 23, 2008 1:29 PM, Chris Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>> And then if you're using
> a client such as solrsharp, there's the question of whether *it* will
> slurp the whole stream into memory.
>
>
Solrsharp reads of the XML stream from Solr use standard dotnet framework
XML objects,
protected="protwords.txt"/>
isn't that what protwords.txt does?
Hello folks..
I'm seeing something that makes total sense to me, but the pointy
haired bosses don't like it, so I've gotta come up with a solution. We
search a pretty standard product catalog, and due to stemming a search
for "running shoes" matches things with "Runs 1/2 a size large" in th
Yep. I removed the "build" dir and rerun ant dist. Now it works silly me...
Anyway here's the app
http://search.tailsweep.com/searchfeeds.do?q=apple
Kindly
//Marcus
On 1/24/08, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> make sure to run "ant clean" if you get funny compilation errors after
>
make sure to run "ant clean" if you get funny compilation errors after
an update.
Marcus Herou wrote:
Hi.
I did a svn update in trunk and deployed new war on server and jars on
client (after recompile) and got this.
I read that the SolrServer changed from Abstract Class to interface. Does
thi
On Jan 24, 2008 9:14 AM, Marcus Herou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did a svn update in trunk and deployed new war on server and jars on
> client (after recompile) and got this.
> I read that the SolrServer changed from Abstract Class to interface. Does
> this have something to do with it perhaps?
Hi.
I did a svn update in trunk and deployed new war on server and jars on
client (after recompile) and got this.
I read that the SolrServer changed from Abstract Class to interface. Does
this have something to do with it perhaps?
java.lang.IncompatibleClassChangeError: Found class
org.apache.so
Thanks,
the solution is now detailed very clearly.
Just one more point, more theoretical then technical:
i'm using Solr in a e-commerce site, and i wanted to use protected words
also to reduce recall for certain queries.
It could be that a parallel approach using dismax boosting for fields suc
10 matches
Mail list logo
