Re: Solr feasibility with terabyte-scale data

Hi, Some quick notes, since it's late here. - You'll need to wait for SOLR-303 - there is no way even a big machine will be able to search such a large index in a reasonable amount of time, plus you may simply not have enough RAM for such a large index. - I'd suggest you wait for Solr 1.3 (or s

Re: Storing Related Data - At Different Times

You could have 2 separate indices tied with a common field (a la FK->PK). Then you only need to change the item you are updating. Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message From: Gavin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: solr-user Sent: Monday, January 21

Re: spellcheckhandler

You don't need to wait for 1.3 to be released - you can simply use a recent nightly build. Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message From: anuvenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 12:35:52 AM Su

Re: Update the index

http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateXmlMessages Is this what you are looking for. Index the document again and it should overwrite the older one with the same id. Gavin-39 wrote: > > Hi, > Can some one point me to a location where it describes how to update an > already indexed document? I w

Re: spellcheckhandler

I followed the steps outlined in http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckerRequestHandler with regards to setting up of the schema with a new field 'spell' and copying other fields to this 'spell' field at index time. It works fine with single word queries but doesn't return anything for multi-word

Update the index

Hi, Can some one point me to a location where it describes how to update an already indexed document? I was thinking there is and tag explained somewhere but cant find it. Thanks, -- Gavin Selvaratnam, Project Leader hSenid Mobile Solutions Phone: +94-11-2446623/4 Fax: +94-11-2307579

Storing Related Data - At Different Times

Hi, In the web application we are developing we have two sets of details. The personal details and the resume details. We allow 5 different resumes to be available for each user. But we want the personal details to remain same for each 5 resumes. Personal details are added at registration t

Term vector

what are term vectors? How do they help with mlt? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Term-vector-tp14990408p14990408.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: solr 1.3

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/trunk or http://lucene.apache.org/solr/version_control.html On 1/21/08, anuvenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Could you please let me know the location from where i can get it. > > climbingrose wrote: > > > > I'm using code pulled directly from Subve

Re: solr 1.3

Could you please let me know the location from where i can get it. climbingrose wrote: > > I'm using code pulled directly from Subversion. > > On Jan 21, 2008 12:34 PM, anuvenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> Thanks. Would this be the latest code from the trunk that you mentioned? >> http:/

Re: solr 1.3

I'm using code pulled directly from Subversion. On Jan 21, 2008 12:34 PM, anuvenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks. Would this be the latest code from the trunk that you mentioned? > http://people.apache.org/builds/lucene/solr/nightly/solr-2008-01-19.zip > > > climbingrose wrote: > > > > I d

Re: Getting multiple category results

On Jan 18, 2008 11:54 PM, muddassir hasan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks Ryan, > > Field collapsing that u have suggested is close to what i want. > > But I am still in need of certain solution to my first problem i.e. sorting > on combined score of date and relevancy of document. See the Di

Re: solr 1.3

Thanks. Would this be the latest code from the trunk that you mentioned? http://people.apache.org/builds/lucene/solr/nightly/solr-2008-01-19.zip climbingrose wrote: > > I don't think they (Solr developers) have a time frame for 1.3 release. > However, I've been using the latest code from the tr

Re: solr 1.3

I don't think they (Solr developers) have a time frame for 1.3 release. However, I've been using the latest code from the trunk and I can tell you it's quite stable. The only problem is the documentation sometimes doesn't cover lastest changes in the code. You'll probably have to dig into the code

solr 1.3

when will this be released? where can i find the list of improvements/enhancements in 1.3 if its been documented already? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/solr-1.3-tp14989395p14989395.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: spell check component

I just asked this too: http://www.mail-archive.com/solr-user@lucene.apache.org/msg08515.html On Jan 19, 2008, at 1:45 PM, anuvenk wrote: Is it possible to add a spell check component so i don't have to issue a separate request to solr to do the spell checking? Sorry if this question is n