Thanks Ryan,
Field collapsing that u have suggested is close to what i want.
But I am still in need of certain solution to my first problem i.e. sorting on
combined score of date and relevancy of document.
Dear friends, please put in your suggestions.
M.Hasan
Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Nice description of a use-case. My 2 pennies embedded...
Phillip Farber wrote:
Hello everyone,
We are considering Solr 1.2 to index and search a terabyte-scale
dataset of OCR. Initially our requirements are simple: basic
tokenizing, score sorting only, no faceting. The schema is simple
to
Unfortunately, dismax does not do short-circuiting in the computer
science sense (stop evaluation once one clause matches).
I too have thought about implementing a scorer that has that
behaviour, but I've never gotten around to it (it would be expensive).
-Mike
On 18-Jan-08, at 3:13 PM, Yo
: Is there a default "mm" value (minimum should match) for the DisMaxReqHandler?
yeah ... it's "100%" (a more sensible default then "1" was my
justification at the time i believe.)
: should match? Is this a bug, or an undocumented feature? That is, should I
: file a JIRA issue, or update the
See DisMax... it will let you easily do multi-field queries that do
what you want.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMaxRequestHandler
q=food&qf=field_a^40 field_b^30 field_c^20 field_d^10
-Yonik
On Jan 18, 2008 5:43 PM, Mark Cornick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> We're working on an
Is there a default "mm" value (minimum should match) for the
DisMaxReqHandler? I have two optional clauses and I have not declared
any mm value in my config and I am not getting results, despite
knowing that both clauses return results individually. In debugging,
Solr, is definitely retur
Greetings,
We're working on an application for a client that uses Solr (via the
acts_as_solr Rails plugin) to query a database of about 16 million
business listings. Part of our client's strategy is to weigh matches
on certain fields higher than others. We've been using Solr boosts to
acc
Hello everyone,
We are considering Solr 1.2 to index and search a terabyte-scale dataset
of OCR. Initially our requirements are simple: basic tokenizing, score
sorting only, no faceting. The schema is simple too. A document
consists of a numeric id, stored and indexed and a large text fiel
On 17-Jan-08, at 4:35 PM, anuvenk wrote:
How to accomplish this with solr?
Say for a search term like 'alternative dispute resolution', i want
to be
able to display
'see related searches' and display related search terms like
'mediation',
'arbitration' etc.
Has anyone done something like
Thanks Peter, sorry for the difficulties you ran into and thanks for sharing
the fixes you implemented. The issues you ran into are (mostly) due to
changes in configuration around Solr with the pending 1.3x code level. The
code release committed at CodePlex on 12/30/2007 was built against the Sol
On Jan 18, 2008 11:04 AM, Peter Thygesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In Solr Relevancy FAQ if found a "solution" for boosting newer
> document... However a newbie dumb ass like me can't get it to work.. :(
>
> I want to query solr and have it show me results by date desc. (date is
> a field)
Some
Hello,
I am new to solr and lucene and have a question concerning information about
the term matching in lucene.
For a few reasons (mainly field based security restrictions) I need to know
which fields in my result documents matched the query
e.g. I would like to have something like
field1
In Solr Relevancy FAQ if found a "solution" for boosting newer
document... However a newbie dumb ass like me can't get it to work.. :(
I want to query solr and have it show me results by date desc. (date is
a field)
I suppose I can use the explicit sort.. but FAQ talks about boosting and
I would
muddassir hasan wrote:
Dear friends,
I have started using Solr recently. I am facing a problem that in a query to
solr i can get results sorted either on my date filed or on score which is
calculated through frequency and proximity of query keywords in indexed
documents. Is there a way to get
wildcard queries are not first passed through an analyzer. See
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ#head-4d62118417eaef0dcb87f4370583f809848ea695
"Are Wildcard Queries Case Sensitive", which also has an explanation
of *why* wildcards aren't passed through an analyzer.
So, assuming you
You could try
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb896653.aspx
Erick
On Jan 18, 2008 4:33 AM, Geert-Jan Brits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks. And on Windows?
>
> 2008/1/18, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > Paging - quite possible. Run vmstat 2' on that server when
Hi,
I have a strange Solr behaviour when the request first word
includes a upper case character and a wildcard : no result.
I quickly searched into Solr issue tracker but didn't find anything about...
Example:
"S?lr" => no result
"s?Lr?" => no result
"s?lr" => result = "Solr"
java
Thanks. And on Windows?
2008/1/18, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Paging - quite possible. Run vmstat 2' on that server when its slow and
> see if there is any paging (look at the 'si' and 'so' columns).
>
> Otis
> --
> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>
>
Dear friends,
I have started using Solr recently. I am facing a problem that in a query to
solr i can get results sorted either on my date filed or on score which is
calculated through frequency and proximity of query keywords in indexed
documents. Is there a way to get score which combines bot
Solr Server:
HW: IBM xSeries 300 (old pizzabox)
OS: Ubuntu Server 7.10
WEB: Tomcat 6.0.14
SOLR: Nightly build 2008-01-14
Thx,
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Rodenburg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18. januar 2008 03:24
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Getting SolrSharp
20 matches
Mail list logo
