Several things in this thread should be clarified (note: order of
quotations munged for clarity)...
: I had read this page. But I'm not using the "NOT" operator, I'm using the
: "-" operator. I'm assuming there is a subtle difference between them in
: that NOT qualifies something else, hence
Hi Mike and Otis,
Mike Klaas a écrit :
See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters . The default
behaviour will provide snippets like google does.
Note that you need to "store" the text of fields you want to highlight
for this to work.
Thanks for the help. Works like a charm.
Now that Microsoft is buying FAST (!!) the open source world needs a
matching technology :)
-Original Message-
From: Walter Underwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 7:42 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: LNS - or - "now i know we've succeeded"
Yes
The *:* (star colon star) means "all records". The trick is to use (*:* AND
-field:[* TO *]). It's silly, but there it is.
A performance note: we switched from empty fields to fields with a standard
'empty' value. This way we don't have to do a range check to find records
with empty fields.
Lance
See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters . The default
behaviour will provide snippets like google does.
Note that you need to "store" the text of fields you want to
highlight for this to work.
cheers,
-Mike
On 14-Jan-08, at 2:17 PM, Ycrux wrote:
Maybe the right name is "S
: I've made room, restarted resin, and now solr won't start. No useful messages
: in the startup, just a
:
: [21:01:49.105] Could not start SOLR. Check solr/home property
: [21:01:49.105] java.lang.NullPointerException
: [21:01:49.105] at org
: .apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.init(SolrDi
Maybe the right name is "Snippet". Like Google snippets.
cheers
Y.
Otis Gospodnetic a écrit :
Sounds like you are looking for a highlighter/KWIC, not a summarizer?
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: Ycrux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'm using Solr for searching our system.
Using MoreLikeThis for related content searching.
Now url used for search is like this:
http://localhost:8983/solr/mlt?q=nid:7280&mlt=true&mlt.fl=title,teaser,body&mlt.mindf=1&mlt.mintf=1&fl=nid,title,score
Where "nid" is uniqueKey and "title,teaser,body" a
On Jan 14, 2008, at 4:08 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
ug -- maybe someone else has better ideas, but you can try:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/trunk/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/CheckIndex.java
thanks for the tip, i did run that, but I stopped it 30 minutes in, as
it was s
ug -- maybe someone else has better ideas, but you can try:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/trunk/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/CheckIndex.java
I think that converts (what it can) to a 2.3 index.
The NullPointerException should be gone in trunk, that is just an
artifact of st
We had an index run out of disk space. Queries work fine but commits
return
500 doc counts differ for segment _18lu: fieldsReader shows 104
but segmentInfo shows 212
org.apache.lucene.index.CorruptIndexException: doc counts differ for
segment _18lu: fieldsReader shows 104 but segmentInfo
Evgeniy Strokin wrote:
If I make one of my field as a unique ID, id doesn't increase/decrease
performance of searching by this field. Right?
For example if I have two fields, I know for sure both of them are unique, both
the same type, and make one of them as a Solr Unique ID. The general
perf
If I make one of my field as a unique ID, id doesn't increase/decrease
performance of searching by this field. Right?
For example if I have two fields, I know for sure both of them are unique, both
the same type, and make one of them as a Solr Unique ID. The general
performance should be the sam
Hi Otis,
Don't know really what's the name for that.
cheers
Y.
Otis Gospodnetic a écrit :
Sounds like you are looking for a highlighter/KWIC, not a summarizer?
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: Ycrux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sounds like you are looking for a highlighter/KWIC, not a summarizer?
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: Ycrux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 2:45:09 PM
Subject: Text Summarizer
Hello.
I'm using Solr for searching our system.
Using MoreLikeThis for related content searching.
Now url used for search is like this:
http://localhost:8983/solr/mlt?q=nid:7280&mlt=true&mlt.fl=title,teaser,body&mlt.mindf=1&mlt.mintf=1&fl=nid,title,score
Where "nid" is uniqueKey and "title,teaser
Hi!
I'm looking for a good way to get a good "text summarizer"
for my personal search engine based Solr.
Actually, I'm using "ots" (Open Text Summurizer) but the result
is far from perfection.
Here's an example of usage:
$ elinks "http://lucene.apache.org/solr/"; -force-html -no-numbering \
-no
I haven't looked at the Spellchecker in a while, but it sounds like you are
deleting the index files manually. Any reason for that? Shouldn't that
rebuild command run smoothly even with a pre-existing index there (funny that I
ask this, considering this was my doing).
Otis
--
Sematext -- http
Re monitoring IO activity iostat, vmstat, sar and such under Linux, for
example.
Yes, Solr doesn't count how long it takes to send the response back to the
client, so if the response is large and/or network is slow, the actual number
is going to be higher than the number that Solr logs.
Ot
the example.xsl is an example using XSLT to format results. Check:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/XsltResponseWriter
For php, check:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolPHP
ryan
Ma, Xiaohui (NIH/NLM/LHC) [C] wrote:
Thanks so much for your reply! Please tell me what example.xsl is for in
conf/xslt.
On Jan 14, 2008 11:55 AM, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the example.xsl is an example using XSLT to format results. Check:
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/XsltResponseWriter
To add to the above: I think the XsltResponseWriter is not intended
for formatting results for display on your w
Thanks very much, Ryan. I really appreciate it. I will take a look on
both.
Best regards,
Xiaohui
-Original Message-
From: Ryan McKinley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 11:56 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: new to solr
the example.xsl is an exam
On Jan 11, 2008 10:44 AM, Evgeniy Strokin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello. If I need documents which has number of fields but also I have number
> of other documents which related to the first one one-to-many. For example a
> person, could have several addresses. I want to have all of them in
Thanks so much for your reply! Please tell me what example.xsl is for in
conf/xslt.
Please let me know where the search result is located. I can use php or
.net to display the result in web. Is it created on fly?
Thanks,
Xiaohui
-Original Message-
From: Ryan McKinley [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
Ma, Xiaohui (NIH/NLM/LHC) [C] wrote:
Hello,
I am new to solr.
Welcome!
I followed solr online tutorial to get the example
work. The search result is xml. I wonder if there is a way to show
result in a form. I saw there is example.xsl in conf/xslt directory. I
really don't know how to do it.
Hello,
I am new to solr. I followed solr online tutorial to get the example
work. The search result is xml. I wonder if there is a way to show
result in a form. I saw there is example.xsl in conf/xslt directory. I
really don't know how to do it. Anyone has some ideas for me. I really
appreciate it
I have a batch program which inserts items in a solr/lucene index.
all is going fine and I get update messages in the console like:
14-jan-2008 16:40:52 org.apache.solr.update.processor.LogUpdateProcessor
finish
INFO: {add=[10485, 10488, 10489, 10490, 10491, 10495, 10497, 10498, ...(42
more)
]}
Hi Erik, thanks for your reply,
I had read this page. But I'm not using the "NOT" operator, I'm using
the "-" operator. I'm assuming there is a subtle difference between them in
that NOT qualifies something else, hence needs 2 terms. Isn't the "-"
operator supposed to be a complement to th
Yes, they are reputable. They've been doing consulting with Verity,
Ultraseek, and other platforms for many years. --wunder
On 1/12/08 1:22 AM, "Chris Hostetter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is pretty cool to see a reputable
> Search company (is ideaeng.com a reputable search consulting compa
Have you seen this page?
http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/queryparsersyntax.html
>From that page:
Note: The NOT operator cannot be used with just one term. For example, the
following search will return no results:
NOT "jakarta apache"
Erick
On Jan 14, 2008 9:30 AM, Karen Loughran <[EMAIL PRO
Hi all,
We are indexing different types of documents, some with certain fields set and
some without, some fields sometimes in both.
If a particular field is missing in a newly added record, I would have
expected the query:
field_name:(-null)
not to return this particular record in the respo
Lately I've been having issues with the spellchecker failing to properly rebuild my spell index. I
used to be able to delete the spell directory and reload the core and build the index fine if it
ever crapped out, but now I can't even build it.
java.io.FileNotFoundException: /home/dsteiger/sol
32 matches
Mail list logo
