: Subject: Solr, Multiple processes running
: References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
...
http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack
Thread Hijacking on Mailing Lists
When starting a new discussion on a mailing list, please do not reply
: > such that if you search for category, you get all those documents that have
: > been tagged with the category AND any sub categories. If this is possible I
: > think I'll investigate using solr in place of some existing code we have
: > that deals with indexing and searching of such data.
:
:
:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml#head-af67aefdc51d18cd8556de164606030446f56554
:
: indexed means searchable (facet and sort also need this), stored instead
: is needed only when you need the original text (i.e. not
: tokenized/analyzed) to be returned.
: When stored and indexed are not pr
: I asked a question similar to this back in
: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-solr-user/200709.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
: SolrDispatchFilter and stored in the global Config). This way, I can
: have a multiple instances of Solr up and running with the exact same
: configuration
: Why use FAST and not use SOLR ? For example.
: What will FAST offer that will justify the investment ?
Am I the only one that finds these questions incredibly hilarious?
particularly on this list?
You should also email FAST customer service and ask them "Why use Solr and
not use FAST ?" :)
On Dec 13, 2007 1:38 AM, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think the last *major* change going into 1.3 is SOLR-303 (Distributed
> Search over HTTP) -- this will require some reworking of new features
> like SearchComponents and solrj. After that, changes will mostly be for
> stabili
I presume you understand the difference between Solr and Flex - and am not
sure what you need the code for?
do you want an AS3 script implementation/wrapper for Solr or are you
expecting an application which call uses Solr(to index the docs) and
retrieve the docs using some web services and present
... SOLR-303 (Distributed Search over HTTP)...
Woo-hoo!
-Original Message-
From: Ryan McKinley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 12:09 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr 1.3 expected release date
Owens, Martin wrote:
> What date or year do
> > I already posted a while ago a problem that one of the solr threads
> > starts using 100% of one of the processor cores on a 4 core
> > system.
>
> This sounds like warming / autowarming.
> The other possibility is garbage collection.
What can I do here? Decrease the autowarmcount?
My curren
On Dec 12, 2007 6:15 PM, Michael Thessel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I already posted a while ago a problem that one of the solr threads
> starts using 100% of one of the processor cores on a 4 core
> system.
This sounds like warming / autowarming.
The other possibility is garbage collection.
>
Hello UG
I already posted a while ago a problem that one of the solr threads
starts using 100% of one of the processor cores on a 4 core
system. This doesn't happen right after the start it slightly
increaes for about a week until the process runs constantly at
100%. I couldn't figure out a soluti
On 12-Dec-07, at 11:58 AM, Owens, Martin wrote:
Hello everyone,
Hi Martin,
It is usually preferrable to not reply to an existing message in the
group when starting a new thread. Some people (like me) use clients
that properly track the Followup-To header that gets added, so
multiple t
Fetch your 70,000 results in 70 chunks of 1000 results. Parse each chunk
and add it to your internal list.
If you are allowed to parse Python results, why can't you use a diffetent
XML parser?
What sort of "more work" are you doing? I've implemented lots of stuff
on top of a paged model, includin
>> I think your biggest problem is requesting 70,000 records from Solr.
>> That is not going to be fast.
I know it, but the limits on the development don't lend themselves to putting
all of the fields into lucene so a proper search can be conducted. We need to
return them all because more wor
Owens, Martin wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm looking for a better solution that the current xml output we're currently
getting; if you return more than 70k records the webserver can no longer cope
with parsing the xml and the machine falls over out of memory.
Ideally what we'd like is for the sea
I think your biggest problem is requesting 70,000 records from Solr.
That is not going to be fast.
Two suggestions:
1. Use paging. Get the results in chunks, 10, 25, 100, whatever.
2. Since you are running out of memory parsing XML, I'm guessing
that you're using a DOM-style parser. Don't do tha
Owens, Martin wrote:
What date or year do we believe Solr 1.3 will be released?
Regards, Martin Owens
2008 for sure. It will be after lucene 2.3 and that is a month(more?)
away. My honest guess is late Jan to mid Feb.
I think the last *major* change going into 1.3 is SOLR-303 (Distributed
What date or year do we believe Solr 1.3 will be released?
Regards, Martin Owens
Recono,
This would be easier to do with Lucene. Solr uses Lucene under the hood, so
just write an app that opens appropriate indices and makes use of various
docFreq methods in the Lucene API. Look at TermDocs, IndexReader, TermEnum,
etc.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene -
Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking on some tips on how to create a new document schema and
add it to solr core at runtime. The use case that I'm trying to solve
is:
1. Using a custom configuration tool, user creates a solr schema
2. The schema is added (uploaded) to a solr instance (o
Chris Hostetter wrote:
: Subject: display tokens
:
: How can I retrieve the "analyzed tokens" (e.g. the stemmed values) of a
: specific field?
for a field by name independent of documents? the LukeRequestHandler can
give you the top N terms for a field ... but if you mean "i did a search,
i
Please vote for SOLR-218. I'm not aware of any other way to accomplish the
leading wildcard functionality that would be convenient. SOLR-218 is not
asking that it be enabled by default, only that it be functionality that is
exposed to SOLR admins via config.xml.
On Dec 12, 2007 6:29 AM, Eswar K
Hi All,
I understand that a leading Wild card search is not allowed as it is a very
costly operation. There is an issues logged for it . (
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-218). Is there any other way of
enabling leading wildcards apart from doing it in code by calling *
QueryParser.setAl
See:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml#head-af67aefdc51d18cd8556de164606030446f56554
indexed means searchable (facet and sort also need this), stored instead
is needed only when you need the original text (i.e. not
tokenized/analyzed) to be returned.
When stored and indexed are not present, I
On Dec 12, 2007, at 2:50 AM, Nuno Leitao wrote:
FAST uses two pipelines - an ingestion pipeline (for document
feeding) and a query pipeline which are fully programmable (i.e.,
you can customize it fully). At ingestion time you typically prepare
documents for indexing (tokenize, character
Hi,
iam working on the following task.
I have a big Solr index "B"(round about 2 million forum-post entries) and 50
Sub-Indices "S1-50"(sub-forum entries) which are also included in "B".
Now I want Solr to compare the word frequency of each Word in "S1-50" to the
the word frequency of the whole b
Hi,
I would be some clarifications on which fields should we assign the property
stored="true" and indexed="true"
What is the criteria for these property assignments?
What would be the impact if no field is assigned with this property?
Thanks in Advance,
Regards,
Dilip TS
Starmark Services Pvt.
27 matches
Mail list logo
