: that must appear together on a page. I have a multiValued TextField called
: "page" in a document with uniqueId called "id" that represents a OCR'd book.
: My default operator is AND. My default field is "page". My query is:
:
: q=adhesion+ring&fl=id,score&fq=id:(1+44)&version=2.2
:
: But thi
We're doing a similar process using term vectors to look up the
bounding-box data in a custom response writer for a specific project,
but we're trying to get this packaged up in a more generally usable way
along with handling paging: see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-380. We're looking
Erik has already made some good fllowup comments, but to address some
specific points...
: What was the original thinking behind not having solr/home set in the
: web.xml -- seems like an easier way to deal with this.
because then people would *have* to unpack the war to change it ... some
co
On 5-Dec-07, at 1:02 PM, Owens, Martin wrote:
Thanks Mike, So in essence I need to write a new RequestHandler
plugin which takes the query string, tokenises it then perform a
some kind of action against the index to return results which I
should then be able to get the termVectors from?
You do not necessarily need two requests; instead, you can override
or modify the request handler you are using (StandardRequestHandler,
DisMaxREquestHandler) to return the information. You'll have to
process the Query to extract the terms (like HighlighingUtils does),
then get the TermVe
On 3-Dec-07, at 10:58 AM, Owens, Martin wrote:
You can tell lucene to store token offsets using TermVectors
(configurable via schema.xml). Then you can customize the request
handler to return the token offsets (and/or positions) by retrieving
the TVs.
I think that is the best plan of actio
Owens, Martin wrote:
Hello everyone,
We're working to replace the old Linux version of dtSearch with Lucene/Solr,
using the http requests for our perl side and java for the indexing.
The functionality that is causing the most problems is the highlighting since
we're not storing the text in so
On Dec 5, 2007 3:06 PM, Owens, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> surely the term offsets are returned when a search is done on a field with
> that data available?
Nope.
That data isn't even stored in the index unless you store termvectors
with that info... and even in that case the info is more
Hello again,
So I've been concentrating on hacking the Util/Highlighting.java to see if I
could get it to output the results offsets I need to do the highlighting I
need. It turns out that this method requires that the field be stored as well
as indexed. I would like to be able to just set term
I don't recall any differences in tomcat 6 configuration compared to
tomcat 5, did you try to follow the information on wiki for tomcat 5 on
your installation?
--
Sami Siren
Matthew Runo wrote:
> Ok, I updated it. I hope it makes sense =\
>
> I'm not really familiar enough with the Context cha
Thanks Matthew! I tidied up a couple of minor things in there.
Erik
On Dec 5, 2007, at 2:00 PM, Matthew Runo wrote:
Ok, I updated it. I hope it makes sense =\
I'm not really familiar enough with the Context changes to add
those. If someone else would be so kind as to add "the othe
Ok, I updated it. I hope it makes sense =\
I'm not really familiar enough with the Context changes to add those.
If someone else would be so kind as to add "the other way", it'd be
much appreciated.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrTomcat
--Matthew
On Dec 5, 2007, at 9:31 AM, Erick Erickso
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-426
On Dec 5, 2007 9:57 AM, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Charles Hornberger wrote:
> > On Dec 4, 2007 6:25 PM, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> i'm not sure what you mean by "applied to 1.2" ... releases are static:
> >> onc
It would be cool if you'd end up with something similar to what Lucene
has recently experienced (fully usable maven artifacts for releases and
nightly builds).
Agreed. Hopefully solr could have a similar setup to lucene.
If it has any value I could at least put some poms together.
that w
Charles Hornberger wrote:
On Dec 4, 2007 6:25 PM, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i'm not sure what you mean by "applied to 1.2" ... releases are static:
once published they are never changed. in the event of serious bugs (ie:
security holes or crash related bugs) then point releases
On Dec 4, 2007 6:25 PM, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> i'm not sure what you mean by "applied to 1.2" ... releases are static:
> once published they are never changed. in the event of serious bugs (ie:
> security holes or crash related bugs) then point releases may be published
> (
It seemed handy in the mentioned case where its not certain if there are
products in each of the budgetcategories so you simply ask them all, and
only get back the categories which contain at least 1 product.
>From a functional perspective to me that's kind of on par with doing
facet.mincount=1
The beautiful thing about a wiki is that *anybody* can update them. It's
especially useful if someone who's just struggled through the issues
can write something up since the pain is still fresh . Especially
if you're better than I am about writing things down
All of which leads me to ask if y
I found that the JNDI settings for Tomcat6 were hard to figure out.
Would someone be willing to write it up for the wiki? Since I think
most people getting started with SOLR will be using Tomcat6 (or
Jetty), it would make sense to update the docs a bit to make it easier
to figure out the pr
Ryan McKinley wrote:
> Is anyone managing solr projects with maven? I see:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-19
> but that is >1 year old
>
> If someone has a current pom.xml, can you post it on SOLR-19?
>
> I just started messing with maven, so I don't really know what I am
> doing y
Hello,
I'm still new to Solr/Lucene. I want to search documents for 2 or more
terms that must appear together on a page. I have a multiValued
TextField called "page" in a document with uniqueId called "id" that
represents a OCR'd book. My default operator is AND. My default field is
"page".
On Dec 5, 2007, at 8:33 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Dec 5, 2007 7:45 AM, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Dec 5, 2007, at 5:12 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
In my perusal of the code (SimpleFacets#getFacetQueryCounts), I'm
not seeing that facet.query respects facet.limit even. If you
aske
Hi Ryan,
I'm using solr with Maven 2 in our project. Here is how my pom.xml looks
like:
org.apache.solr
solr-solrj
1.3.0
Since I have all solrj dependencies declared by other artifacts, I don't
need to declare any of solrj dependenci
On Dec 5, 2007 7:45 AM, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 5, 2007, at 5:12 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> > In my perusal of the code (SimpleFacets#getFacetQueryCounts), I'm
> > not seeing that facet.query respects facet.limit even. If you
> > asked for a count for a query, you get it re
On Dec 5, 2007 4:27 AM, Maciej Szczytowski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think I have everything correct with encoding because:
> - there are about 15000 documents with word "иго", but only some of them
> are broken ("и��о")
> - when I reindex broken document invalid characters will be fixed.
>
>
On Dec 5, 2007, at 5:12 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
In my perusal of the code (SimpleFacets#getFacetQueryCounts), I'm
not seeing that facet.query respects facet.limit even. If you
asked for a count for a query, you get it regardless of any other
parameters such as mincount or limit.
sorry, f
Hi,
I am using the text and string mostly for the field types.
And the defaultSearchField has the field type as text.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Dilip TS
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 3:45 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.
This all depends on the schema setting for that particular field.
What is the field type? Sounds like you've got it set to a non-
analyzed/tokenized field.
Erik
On Dec 5, 2007, at 2:04 AM, Dilip.TS wrote:
Hi,
This is in continuation with my previous mail.
Iam using the SOLRInp
In my perusal of the code (SimpleFacets#getFacetQueryCounts), I'm not
seeing that facet.query respects facet.limit even. If you asked for
a count for a query, you get it regardless of any other parameters
such as mincount or limit.
Erik
p.s. I also notice that facet.query always u
No, facet.query does not support limiting currently. You'll need to
strip those client-side for now.
Erik
On Dec 5, 2007, at 4:49 AM, Britske wrote:
is it possible to set a mincount on a facetquery as well as on a
facetfield?
I have a situation in which I want to group facetquer
Hi,
Ideally the params.put("facet.mincount","1"); used for the facet search
should do the same.
It works fine in my case.
Regards
Dilip.
-Original Message-
From: Britske [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 3:19 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: possible
Or, instead of messing around with the JNDI setting, simply set -
Dsolr.solr.home=/opt/solr with the JVM startup parameters for
Tomcat. Hardcoding a path in web.xml is definitely _not_ what we
want to do. Not all containers unpack the WAR file onto disk. Also,
consider the case of up
is it possible to set a mincount on a facetquery as well as on a facetfield?
I have a situation in which I want to group facetqueries (price-ranges) but
I obviously dont want to show ranges with 0 results.
I tried things like: f.price:[0 TO 50].facet.mincount=1 and f.price:[0 TO
50].query.mincou
I think I have everything correct with encoding because:
- there are about 15000 documents with word "иго", but only some of them
are broken ("и��о")
- when I reindex broken document invalid characters will be fixed.
Any ideas?
Maciek
Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Dec 4, 2007 5:02 AM, Maciej Szczyt
34 matches
Mail list logo
