If you went with the FunctionQuery approach for sorting by distance, would
there be any way to use the output of the FunctionQuery to limit the
documents to those within a certain radius? Or is it just for boosting
documents, not for filtering?
Also, even if you're just using it for boosting, is
: It's trivial for the client to normalize if desired - take the top scoring
: document, if it's greater than 1.0 then scale all scores based on that.
this is why doclists include the "maxScore" in their output as well, to
make it easy to normalize scores even if you are using pagination (or
so
Does anyone know of a way to have an index analyzer factory affect the
contents of the actual data (versus the contents of the index)?
Another example would be noting a pattern within a field and then
setting a "flag" field to a particular value, but wanting that value
to be returned as data (n
On 10/26/07, Karen Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But after distribution of this latest snapshop to the slave the collection
> does not show the update (with solr admin query url or via java query client)
> UNLESS I restart tomcat ?
Sounds like a config issue with the scripts... pulling the
Hi Karen,
snappuller and snapinstaller can be run by hand. I'd try that and I'd check
the logs to see what went wrong. Also look at the index directory on the
slaves and make sure that the files there match what you see on the master.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr
Hi David,
I'd start by:
- having a look a the index with Luke (or via some code that just dumps the
content of that created_date field), so I can be 100% sure that the right stuff
is in it to begin with
- 0 results makes me think that index-time and search-time tokenization might
be different,
The differences lie in Lucene.
Instead of thinking of phrase queries as slow, think of term queries as fast :-)
Phrase queries need to read and consider position information that
term queries do not.
-Yonik
On 10/26/07, Haishan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am a new Solr user and wonder if
Hi All.
We're seeing a really interesting problem when searching by
date range.
We have two fields of type "date" in our index (they are both
indexed and stored). They are:
content_date
and
created_date
We can run any date-range query we want against content_date
and we get expected results
Yes, you can add new fields to existing documents with SOLR-139.
As for SOLR-139 status - it's a bit stalled as far as I know. It
would be a wonderful addition to Solr, and hopefully available in
Solr 1.3, but the approach taken in the existing patches is something
I believe will be rework
Solr returns the raw score, not the Lucene Hits normalized one.
It's trivial for the client to normalize if desired - take the top
scoring document, if it's greater than 1.0 then scale all scores
based on that.
Erik
On Oct 26, 2007, at 2:53 AM, zx zhang wrote:
Hi, everyone!
As w
Thank Erik,
That fixed the problem.
Cheers!
harry
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 4:41 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Performance Recommendation
On Oct 25, 2007, at 4:19 PM, Wagner,Harry wrote:
> Where is
Hiya,
I have set up solr CollectionDistribution between a master and a slave with
postCommit triggering snapshooter, and a cron job (snappuller and
snapinstaller) on the slave accepting and installing updated snapshops every
15 minutes.
Once I delete a record from the master (with java code
is it / will it be possible to add priorly non-existing fields to a document
with the upcoming solr-139?
for instance, would something like this work?
318127
12
with schema.xml:
...
...
...
btw: how is solr-139 coming along? By judging the latest posts on jira,
there was still a lot
is it possible to have a CopyField with a functionquery as it's source?
for instance :
If not, I think this would make a nice addition.
thanks,
Geert-Jan
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/copyField-with-functionquery-as-source-tf4696019.html#a13423343
Sent from t
I am a new Solr user and wonder if anyone can help me these questions. I used
Solr to index about two million documents and query on it using standard
request handler. I disabled all cache. I found phrase query was substantially
slower than the usual query. The statistic I collected is as follo
15 matches
Mail list logo
