Thanks Brian.
I'm sure this will help lots of people.
Brian Whitman wrote:
But we still use a version of Sami's patch that works on both trunk
nutch and trunk solr (solrj.) I sent my changes to sami when we did
it, if you need it let me know...
I put my files up here: http://variogr.am/la
But we still use a version of Sami's patch that works on both trunk
nutch and trunk solr (solrj.) I sent my changes to sami when we did
it, if you need it let me know...
I put my files up here: http://variogr.am/latest/?p=26
-b
Sami has a patch in there which used a older version of the solr
client. with the current solr client in the SVN tree, his patch
becomes much easier.
your job would be to upgrade the patch and mail it back to him so
he can update his blog, or post it as a patch for inclusion in
nutch/cont
we had been doing some work with this, and had gotten to the
architecture stage on this at $WORK, but the guy who was leading the
charge got put onto other tasks, and left before having a chance to
implement it, and our priorities shifted to other things ;(
From what I remember, there are seve
[moving this thread to solr-user, as it really has nothing to do with
hadoop]
Daniel Clark wrote:
There's info on website
http://blog.foofactory.fi/2007/02/online-indexing-integrating-nutch-with.htm
l, but it's not clear.
Sami has a patch in there which used a older version of the solr cl
As it turns out I was modifying code that wasn't being run. Running an
optimize after deleting did solve my problem. =)
AgentHubcap wrote:
>
> I'm running 1.2.
>
> Acutally, i am doing an optimize after I delete the indexes. (twice, as I
> read there was an issue with the optimize). Do I
On 9/25/07, Ben Shlomo, Yatir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know I can delete multiple docs with the following:
> mediaId:(6720 OR 6721 OR )
>
> My question is can I do something like this?
> languageId:123 AND manufacturer:456
> (It does not work for me and I didn't forget to commit)
D
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 12:06 +0100, Jérôme Etévé wrote:
> If I understand, you want to keep the raw html code in solr like that
> (in your posting xml file):
>
>
>
>
>
> I think you should encode your content to protect these xml entities:
> < -> <
> > -> >
> " -> "
> & -> &
>
> If you use
Thanks. We're probably not going to be sending huge batches of documents very often, so I'll just
try a persistent connection and hopefully performance won't be an issue. With our document size, I
was posting around 300+ docs/s, so anything reasonably close to that will be good. Historically
If I understand, you want to keep the raw html code in solr like that
(in your posting xml file):
I think you should encode your content to protect these xml entities:
< -> <
> -> >
" -> "
& -> &
If you use perl, have a look at HTML::Entities.
On 9/25/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTE
Hello,
I've got some problem with html code who is embedded in xml file:
Sample source .
Les débats
Le premier tour des élections fédérales se déroulera le 21
octobre prochain. D'ici là, La 1ère vous prop
Hi!
I know I can delete multiple docs with the following:
mediaId:(6720 OR 6721 OR )
My question is can I do something like this?
languageId:123 AND manufacturer:456
(It does not work for me and I didn't forget to commit)
How can I do it ? with copy field ?
languageIdmanufacturer:12345
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 10:03 +0530, Roopesh P Raj wrote:
DISCLAIMER:
Please, I am subscribed to the user list and there is no need to write
me directly nor cc me in your response. More since we are an open source
project off-list communication is suboptimal and harmful to the
community. The communi
you can implement oscache as additional layer in Solr :)
On 9/25/07, climbingrose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think you can with the current Solr because each instance runs in a
> separate web app.
>
> On 9/25/07, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > if use multi solr with one in
I don't think you can with the current Solr because each instance runs in a
separate web app.
On 9/25/07, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> if use multi solr with one index, it will cache individually.
>
> so i think can it share their cache.(they have same config)
>
> --
> regards
> jl
>
15 matches
Mail list logo