On 11/08/07, climbingrose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The spellchecker handler doesn't seem to work with multi-word query. For
> example, when I tried to spellcheck "Java developar", it returns nothing
> while if I tried "developar", spellchecker correctly returns "developer".
> I
> followed the
OK, I just need to define 2 spellcheckers in solrconfig.xml for my purpose.
On 8/11/07, climbingrose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> After looking the SpellChecker code, I realised that it only supports
> single-word. I made a very naive modification of SpellCheckerHandler to get
> multi-word suppo
After looking the SpellChecker code, I realised that it only supports
single-word. I made a very naive modification of SpellCheckerHandler to get
multi-word support. Now the other problem that I have is how to have
different fields in SpellChecker index. For example, since my query has two
parts: "
: Actually, just thinking about this a bit more, perhaps adding a function
: call such as parseDate() might add too much overhead to the actual query,
: perhaps it would be better to first convert the date to a timestamp at index
: time and store it in a field type slong? This might be more effic
Good link, I added it to the wiki page where optimization is covered,
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPerformanceFactors .
Paul Sundling
-Original Message-
From: Stu Hood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 9:23 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Too m
No. Hard links are alternative names for an inode: when lucene
replaces a file, it is creating a new (underlying) inode/file, and
the backup "link" points to the old one.
Don't think of hard links as "links", but additional logical names
for the same physical data.
cheers,
-Mike
On 10-A
So, does it mean the backup could have documents marked as deleted
because they are deleted from the main index?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yonik
Seeley
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 5:44 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject:
On 8/10/07, Wu, Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have some concern with solr using hard link to perform snapshot and
> backup on the indexing box.
>
> When referring to snapshot in contexts other than solr, it usually mean
> some database state which can be revert to when necessary. Since sol
Hi,
I have some concern with solr using hard link to perform snapshot and
backup on the indexing box.
When referring to snapshot in contexts other than solr, it usually mean
some database state which can be revert to when necessary. Since solr
use hard link to create snapshot on the master ind
: i think it is same as lucene until sometime i read something from mail list.
Solr doesn't allways use "official" releases of Lucene -- sometimes we
(Solr committers) rev the underlying Lucene jar in Solr to a nightly build
to take advantage of newer features that we think are useful provided w
: > Is the question whether or not you can run solr in two different servlet
: > containers and index into the same data set?
two instances of Solr (either in sevlert containers or embeded instances)
should be able to use the same index simultenously under the same
conditions as any two isntances
On 8/10/07, Jae Joo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to find out how to build the index for general format of XML
> file which does not have tags.
Solr doesn't really index XML... it's just used as a serialization
format for Lucene documents.
If you understand the layout of your XML, yo
Also, are there any examples out there of how to use Solrsharp's
faceting capabilities?
Charlie Jackson
312-873-6537
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Charlie Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 3:51 PM
To:
Trying to use Solrsharp (which is a great tool, BTW) to get some results
in a C# application. I see the HighlightFields method of the
QueryBuilder object and I've set it to my highlight field, but how do I
get at the results? I don't see anything in the SearchResults code that
does anything with th
The Protégé project at Stanford has nice tools for editing knowledge bases,
taxonomies, etc.
http://protege.stanford.edu/
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Woods [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 10:45 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Best use of
I would like to find out how to build the index for general format of XML
file which does not have tags.
Do I have to update all my xml file to Solr specific XML which have
… format? Or any way to build index?
Thanks,
Jae Joo
This is a Lucene limitation that negative-only boolean queries do not
match anything.
Solr works around this limitation for the top level only.
So when you do
+foo (-bar)
it won't match anything because the parens create a separate boolean
query with only a single negative clause.
+foo -bar
wil
I would like to take a look at your pathAnalyzer code.. I got this
more or less working, but I'd love to see another way to do it - your
solution sounds much more robust than mine. Easier to search for
specific paths, for sure.
++
| M
Hi all,
I'm observing odd results when using parentheses to group two or more
terms in a solr query, some of which are negated (by prefixing the
term with '-' or 'NOT ')
For example, in the current stable version of solr, I indexed the
accompanying example docs:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/solr/example/e
The spellchecker handler doesn't seem to work with multi-word query. For
example, when I tried to spellcheck "Java developar", it returns nothing
while if I tried "developar", spellchecker correctly returns "developer". I
followed the setup on the wiki.
Regards,
Cuong Hoang
On 7/10/07, Charles H
On Aug 9, 2007, at 4:49 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
lo - these things can happen when you get too many levels of
escaping needed.
Hopefully we can improve the situation in the future to get rid of the
query parser escaping for certain queries such as prefix and term.
+1 :)
this is something
21 matches
Mail list logo
