: SOLR-133 includes this fix... it squawks if it hits an unknown tag.
Really? i thought SOLR-133 only changed the way the incoming XML is
parsed, is it also changing hte way the schema.xml is parsed?
as i understand it the update message was correctly formated, it just
refered to a field that
Thanks. That actually make perfect sense. I was thinking that the problem was
somehow more complicated than a simple precision problem. These are all dynamic
fields, so I rarely look at the schema. I'll change the precision in the schema
and then reindex. Hopefully that clears out the problem.
: But I've just notice that in jetty.xml, I have to uncomment some
: lines to enable jetty logging. It's commented out by default.
: I haven't tried this yet though.
the sample instance of Jetty that comes in Solr releases is setup to write
Logging messages to stdout. It is not a recomeneded Jet
: I just downloaded version 1.2 and set it up on my Windows PC.
: Search works but Ping returns error 500:
: Is there any minimum setting for Ping to work?
the ping url triggers a query which can be configured in the
solrconfig.xml, it should work out of the box (even without indexing any
data)
I just downloaded version 1.2 and set it up on my Windows PC.
Search works but Ping returns error 500:
---
HTTP ERROR: 500
Internal Server Error
RequestURI=/solr/admin/ping
Powered by Jetty://
---
Is there any minimum setting for Ping to wor
You're absolute right. I missed one field, which did not have the
solr.StopFilterFactory applied to. I must of missed that while reading the
post yesterday. Anyways, I ensured all the fields that dismax was searching
across had the stopwords applied, and now everything works great!
Thanks Hoss!
There's no logs there :)
But I've just notice that in jetty.xml, I have to uncomment some
lines to enable jetty logging. It's commented out by default.
I haven't tried this yet though.
--
Best regards,
Jack
Thursday, June 14, 2007, 6:21:42 PM, you wrote:
> maybe u will find it in *apache-solr-
maybe u will find it in *apache-solr-1.2.0\example\logs*
and I not use jetty.
2007/6/15, Jack L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Yeah, I'm running 1.1 with jetty.
But I didn't find *.log in the whole solr directory.
Is jetty putting the log files outside the directory?
> what version of solr/container a
Yeah, I'm running 1.1 with jetty.
But I didn't find *.log in the whole solr directory.
Is jetty putting the log files outside the directory?
> what version of solr/container are you running?
> this sounds similar to what people running solr 1.1 with the jetty
> include in that example...
> Ja
On 14-Jun-07, at 4:30 AM, vanderkerkoff wrote:
Hi Brian
I've now set the mysqldb to be default charset utf8, and everything
else is
utf8. collation etc etc.
I think I know what the problem is, and it's a really old one and I
feel
foolish now for not realising it earlier.
Our content p
if u use jetty, u should see jetty's log.
if u use tomcat, u should see tomcat's log.
solr is only a program that run with container.
2007/6/15, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
what version of solr/container are you running?
this sounds similar to what people running solr 1.1 with the je
what version of solr/container are you running?
this sounds similar to what people running solr 1.1 with the jetty
include in that example...
Jack L wrote:
It happened twice in the past few days that the solr instance stopped
responding (the admin page does not load) while the process was st
2007/6/14, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 6/14/07, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i write script to get run time to sure how to performance.
>
> i find very intresting thing that i query 2 solr box to get data and
solr
> response show me qtime all zero.
>
> but i find multi get dat
It happened twice in the past few days that the solr instance stopped
responding (the admin page does not load) while the process was still
running. I'd like to find out what's causing this. I notice that I can
change logger level from admin page but I didn't figure out where the
log files are. Sea
SOLR-133 includes this fix... it squawks if it hits an unknown tag.
Walter Underwood wrote:
Do we have a bug filed on this? Solr really should have complained
about the unknown element. --wunder
On 6/14/07 4:54 PM, "Tiong Jeffrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
arh! i spent 6-7 hours on this er
A 32 bit float has about 7 decimal digits of precision, so your range
queries actually do overlap since 40f is exactly the same as
39f
-Yonik
On 6/14/07, Kevin Osborn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a large subset (47640) of my total index. Most of them (45335) have a
single
On 14-Jun-07, at 4:29 PM, Kevin Osborn wrote:
I have a large subset (47640) of my total index. Most of them
(45335) have a single field, which we will call Field1. Field1 is a
sfloat.
If my query restricts the resultset to my subset and I do a facet
count on Field1, then the number of rec
Do we have a bug filed on this? Solr really should have complained
about the unknown element. --wunder
On 6/14/07 4:54 PM, "Tiong Jeffrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> arh! i spent 6-7 hours on this error and didnt see this! thanks!
>
> On 6/15/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
arh! i spent 6-7 hours on this error and didnt see this! thanks!
On 6/15/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/14/07, Tiong Jeffrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The error is -
> "SEVERE: org.apache.solr.core.SolrException: ERROR:unknown field
'name'..."
>
> In my schema, it was defin
I have a large subset (47640) of my total index. Most of them (45335) have a
single field, which we will call Field1. Field1 is a sfloat.
If my query restricts the resultset to my subset and I do a facet count on
Field1, then the number of records returned is 47640. And if I sum up the facet
co
Daniel Alheiros wrote:
Excellent.
I just added SOLR-20 to trunk.
you will need:
1. checkout trunk
2. ant dist
3. include:
apache-solr-1.3-dev-common.jar
apache-solr-1.3-dev-solrj.jar
solrj-lib/*.jar
Here is the basic interface:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/trunk/client/j
: I'm having the same issues. We are using Dismax, with a stopword list.
: Currently we are having customers typing in "model ipod", we added model to
: the stopwords list and tested with the standard handler..works fine, but not
: with dismax (MM = 3<-1 5<-2 6<90%). When i comment out MM, it
: wo
: get fresh log messages when the server is started again. The new
: schema.xml that shows the changes is via:
:
: http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/get-file.jsp?file=schema.xml
:
: Maybe there's some extra magic to getting the new field to show up at
: all as null or something valuable? Is that th
On 6/14/07, Tiong Jeffrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The error is -
"SEVERE: org.apache.solr.core.SolrException: ERROR:unknown field 'name'..."
In my schema, it was defined like this -
" "
filed => field
-Yonik
Hi,
When I tried to use jetty to index my xml, i kept getting the following
error even though I have defined properly in the schema.xml.
The error is -
"SEVERE: org.apache.solr.core.SolrException: ERROR:unknown field 'name'..."
In my schema, it was defined like this -
" "
The only differe
Ryan McKinley wrote:
>>
>> Any idea if you are going to make it distributable via the central Maven
>> repo?
>>
>
> It will be included in the next official solr release. I don't use
> maven, but assume all official apache projects are included in their
> repo. If they do nightly snapshots, it w
Hi, Chris,
I rewrite the prefix wildcard query consult* to (consult consult?*), it
works with highlighting. Do you think it's a possible solution?
Could you explain a little bit why put a "?" before "*" won't crash solr
if matching a lot of terms?
Thanks
Xuesong
In the trunk (soon to be Solr 1.
Any idea if you are going to make it distributable via the central Maven
repo?
It will be included in the next official solr release. I don't use
maven, but assume all official apache projects are included in their
repo. If they do nightly snapshots, it will be there
ryan
Excellent.
Any idea if you are going to make it distributable via the central Maven
repo?
It could make things easier for those using maven to build their projects...
Like me :)
Regards,
Daniel
On 14/6/07 17:09, "Ryan McKinley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm working on integrating the solrj
I'm working on integrating the solrj client into the official solr
source tree right now. It should be ready to use (test!) later today...
Once it is in /trunk, it will be easy for us to know what version of
what we are talking about and can definitely help work through any issues.
good good
Hi Hoss,
In a round-about way the changes you asked me to make to the catch block
led to the solution. It turned out to be an old version of solr in my
classpath that was being loaded first. I tracked it down after deploying
your changes and seeing no change to the logging.
A bit foolish of me
Using a lucene tool for Luke. Here is the link:
http://www.getopt.org/luke/
-Madhan
-Original Message-
From: Thierry Collogne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 5:28 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Index time boost is not working
How do you browse t
Otis, here is the setting in the schema for the fields I use. OmitNorms
is not set to any value here. Should explicitly set the value to false.
Thanks
Madhan
-Original Message-
From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursda
On 6/14/07, Burkamp, Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I tried the new solr 1.2 war file with the old example distribution (solr
1.1 and jetty 5.1). Suprisingly enough this does not reveal the problem. So
the whole story might even be a jetty issue.
That definitely points to it being a Jetty
Can you provide some examples of the searches you were running and the
errors you were getting?
- will
-Original Message-
From: Thierry Collogne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 10:19 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr 1.2 HTTP Client for Java
I
On 6/14/07, Andreas Balke [Digiden GmbH] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
the important point (and first question) is that our schema is very
likely to change. that means we will have 'revisions' of documents
whereas each revision has its own, slightly different, schema.
structuring the documents itsel
On 6/14/07, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i write script to get run time to sure how to performance.
i find very intresting thing that i query 2 solr box to get data and solr
response show me qtime all zero.
but i find multi get data script use time is 0.046674966812134(it will
change)
Hey all,
i checked out solr and i'm pretty amazed since this could save us a lot
of work. we are working on a document managment system and currently
change the document structure to be valid to predefined schemas. each
document will contain of several 'complex types' what is compareable to
x
I tried using that client, but I didn't get any good results while searching
for worst with special characters. I have also searched for documentation
for that client, but didn't find any.
Does anyone know where to find documentation concerning the java client?
On 14/06/07, Will Johnson <[EMAIL
The code in http://solrstuff.org/svn/solrj/ is very stable, works with
most all features for both searching and indexing and will be moving
into the main distribution soon as the standard java client library.
- will
-Original Message-
From: Martin Grotzke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 13:13 +0100, Daniel Alheiros wrote:
> Thanks Martin.
>
> I'm using one of them which the optimize command doesn't work properly
> Have you seen the same problem?
Nope, I'm using the client only for queries - the xml generation /
posting to solr is done by another module i
Check your schema.xml, that's where you'll see how the field is defined.
Otis
- Original Message
From: Thierry Collogne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 8:27:54 AM
Subject: Re: Index time boost is not working
How do you browse the indexe
How do you browse the indexes?
On 14/06/07, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is your field defined with omitNorms="true" by any chance?
Otis
--
Lucene Consulting -- http://lucene-consulting.com/
- Original Message
From: Madhan Subhas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@luce
I think this would be useful. The other day I hit this problem of fq= not
working. It turned out that the schema was changed (some non-indexed fields
were made indexed), the bulk upload was done, but that bulk upload left the old
index files in place, so ended up with "double index" withi
Thanks Martin.
I'm using one of them which the optimize command doesn't work properly
Have you seen the same problem?
Regards,
Daniel
On 14/6/07 13:07, "Martin Grotzke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 11:32 +0100, Daniel Alheiros wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I've been using one J
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 11:32 +0100, Daniel Alheiros wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've been using one Java client I got from a colleague but I don't know
> exactly its version or where to get any update for it. Base package is
> org.apache.solr.client (where there are some common packages) and the client
> main
Is your field defined with omitNorms="true" by any chance?
Otis
--
Lucene Consulting -- http://lucene-consulting.com/
- Original Message
From: Madhan Subhas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 5:35:17 AM
Subject: Index time boost is not wor
Hi Brian
I've now set the mysqldb to be default charset utf8, and everything else is
utf8. collation etc etc.
I think I know what the problem is, and it's a really old one and I feel
foolish now for not realising it earlier.
Our content people are copying and pasting sh*t from word into the co
Hi
I've been using one Java client I got from a colleague but I don't know
exactly its version or where to get any update for it. Base package is
org.apache.solr.client (where there are some common packages) and the client
main package is org.apache.solr.client.solrj.
Is it available via Maven2 c
Hi all,
I have a problem after updating to solr 1.2. I'm using the bundled jetty
that comes with the latest solr release.
Some of the contents that are stored in my index contain characters from
the unicode private section above 0x10. (They are used by some
proprietary software and the text ex
I am using solr in my rails application. When I create the document that
need to be stored in Solr I can see the boost values being set on the
fields as attributes. However when I browse the indexes through luke I
see a boost value of 1. What am I missing. Thanks for your input.
-Madhan
is it ok?
2007/6/14, vanderkerkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Yonik
Here's the output from netcat
POST /solr/update HTTP/1.1
Host: localhost:8983
Accept-Encoding: identity
Content-Length: 83
Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8
that looks Ok to me, but I am a bit twp you see.
:-)
Yonik Seel
i write script to get run time to sure how to performance.
i find very intresting thing that i query 2 solr box to get data and solr
response show me qtime all zero.
but i find multi get data script use time is 0.046674966812134(it will
change)
solr box in my pc. and index data is very small.
Hi Yonik
Here's the output from netcat
POST /solr/update HTTP/1.1
Host: localhost:8983
Accept-Encoding: identity
Content-Length: 83
Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8
that looks Ok to me, but I am a bit twp you see.
:-)
Yonik Seeley wrote:
>
> On 6/13/07, vanderkerkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hello Hoss
Thanks for replying, I tried what you suggested as the iniital step of my
troubleshooting and it outputs it fine.
It was what I suspected initially as well, but thanks for the advice.
hossman_lucene wrote:
>
>
> : I'm running solr1.2 and Jetty, I'm having problems looping through
55 matches
Mail list logo
