Walter Underwood wrote:
> This is for monitoring -- what happened in the last 30 seconds.
> Log file analysis doesn't really do that.
>
I would respectfully disagree.
Log file analysis of each request can give you that, and a whole lot more.
you could either grab the stats via a regular cron j
i use command like this
curl http://localhost:8983/solr/update --data-binary
'name:DDR'
curl http://localhost:8983/solr/update --data-binary ''
and i get
numDocs : 0
maxDoc : 1218819
when i search something which exists in before delete and find nothing.
but index file size not changed
On 5/9/07, joestelmach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does solr provide any additional concurrency control over what Lucene
provides?
Yes, coordination between the main index searcher, the index writer,
and the index reader needed to delete other documents.
In my simple testing of indexing 2,000
Yonik,
Thanks for your fast reply.
> No, not currently. Start your implementation with just a single
> index... unless it is very large, it will likely be fast enough.
My index will get quite large
> Solr also handles all the concurrency issues, and you should never hit
> "lock access timeou
Thanks, worked perfectly!
-Nick
On 5/10/07, Walter Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No problem. Use a boost function. In a DisMaxRequestHandler spec
in solrconfig.xml, specify this:
popularity^0.5
This value will be added to the score before ranking.
You will probably need to f
Yes, for good (hopefully)
or bad.
-Sean
Shridhar Venkatraman wrote on 5/7/2007, 12:37 AM:
Interesting..
Surrogates can also bring the searcher's subjectivity (opinion and
context) into it by the learning process ?
shridhar
Sean Timm wrote:
It may not be easy or even possible
withou
On 5/3/07, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/3/07, Jack L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Python output uses nested dictionaries for facet counts.
This might be fixed in the future
It's fixed in the current development version (future 1.2), already.
See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/So
No problem. Use a boost function. In a DisMaxRequestHandler spec
in solrconfig.xml, specify this:
popularity^0.5
This value will be added to the score before ranking.
You will probably need to fuss with the multiplier to get the popularity
to the right proportion of the total score. I
Hi all,
I have a popularity field in my solr index, this field is a popularity
rating of a particular product (based on the number of product views
etc).
I want to be able to integrate this number into the search result
sorting such that a product with a higher popularity rating is ranking
highe
I didn't remember that requirement, so I looked it up. It was added
in XML 1.0 2nd edition. Originally, unspecified encodings were open
for auto-detection.
Content type trumps encoding declarations, of course, per RFC 3023
and allowed by the XML spec.
wunder
On 5/9/07 4:19 PM, "Mike Klaas" <[EMA
On 5/9/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 on explicit encoding declarations.
Done (even though it really wasn't needed since there were no int'l
chars in the example).
As Mike points out, it only marginally helps... if the user adds
international chars to the config and saves it
On 5/4/07, escher2k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(2) Is it possible to force Lucene to treat a multiword (e.g. Ruby on Rails)
as one word ? I am not sure
if there is a mechanism to do this by creating a special text file (like the
one that exists for synonyms for
instance) ?
Solr's SynonymFilter
+1 on explicit encoding declarations.
Done (even though it really wasn't needed since there were no int'l
chars in the example).
As Mike points out, it only marginally helps... if the user adds
international chars to the config and saves it as something other than
UTF-8 they are still hosed.
+1 on explicit encoding declarations.
Yonik Seeley wrote:
On 5/9/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you are saving the file in UTF-8 format, then try changing the
first line to be this:
We should probably change the example solrconfig.xml and schema.xml to
be UTF-8 by default. A
On 5/9/07, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yonik Seeley wrote:
> We should probably change the example solrconfig.xml and schema.xml to
> be UTF-8 by default. Any objections?
>
I'm for it...
but if the xml parser uses getReader() does it make any difference?
For Solr's XML config fi
Yonik Seeley wrote:
On 5/9/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you are saving the file in UTF-8 format, then try changing the
first line to be this:
We should probably change the example solrconfig.xml and schema.xml to
be UTF-8 by default. Any objections?
I'm for it...
but if
On 5/9/07, joestelmach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My first intuition is to give each user their own index. My thinking here is
that querying would be faster (since each user's index would be much smaller
than one big index,) and, more importantly, that I would dodge any
concurrency issues stemmin
I was about to suggest the same thing.
+1 on explicit encoding declarations.
wunder
On 5/9/07 3:26 PM, "Yonik Seeley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/9/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If you are saving the file in UTF-8 format, then try changing the
>> first line to be this:
>>
On 5/9/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/9/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you are saving the file in UTF-8 format, then try changing the
> first line to be this:
>
We should probably change the example solrconfig.xml and schema.xml to
be UTF-8 by default. Any o
On 5/9/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you are saving the file in UTF-8 format, then try changing the
first line to be this:
We should probably change the example solrconfig.xml and schema.xml to
be UTF-8 by default. Any objections?
-Yonik
On 5/5/07, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Expect it to support other language like chinese.
maybe solr facet can config like this when it support other language.
title:"诺基亚"
solrconfig.xml is a normal XML document. It currently starts off with
which has no char encoding specified and
Hello,
I'm a bit new to search indexing and I'm hoping some of you here can help me
with an e-mail application I'm working on. I have a mail retrieval program
that accesses multiple POP accounts in parallel, and parses each message
into a database. I would like to add a new document to a solr i
You could perhaps use faceting to do this for single terms.
Set the base query to whatever you want (or *:* for everything)
Then use facet.field=text&facet.prefix=foo
If you indexed field values as strings like "fuel consumption"
(instead of breaking it up into tokens) then you could get your
phr
: Example:
: "a b"~1 will match fields with a b, a x b, or b a, but not b x a.
: The last would require a slop of 2
also note that there are two "slop" params in the DisMax handler ... "qs"
refers to how much "slop' will be used when querying the qf fields if the
user actually types in a query st
On 5/9/07, Matthew Runo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ah hah! After doing some research, slop is a fun term for how sloppy
a match SOLR will make.
Eg, slop = 0, means that only exact matches will work. Slop = 1 means
that they can be off by one word... etc
Yes?
All terms must appear, but the pos
: does solr support date range searching? i've tried all the examples on
: the lucene site as well as using the solr response format and a few
: others that seemed nifty but so far I always get query parsing errors.
: i know i can easily convert the dates to ints and do ranges that way but
: all
Ah hah! After doing some research, slop is a fun term for how sloppy
a match SOLR will make.
Eg, slop = 0, means that only exact matches will work. Slop = 1 means
that they can be off by one word... etc
Yes?
++
| Matthew Runo
| Zapp
Perfect! I had seen the wiki, but did not visit the class page since
I am using Perl.
What is "slop"? heh
++
| Matthew Runo
| Zappos Development
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| 702-943-7833
+-
check:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMaxRequestHandler
For now, most of the docs for dismax are in the javadocs:
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/api/org/apache/solr/request/DisMaxRequestHandler.html
Matthew Runo wrote:
I'd love to see some explanation of what's going on here, and how to
confi
I'd love to see some explanation of what's going on here, and how to
configure it for my own use. I've changed the fields to match my own
columns, but it'd be great if I could actually understand it..
243 class="solr.DisMaxRequestHandler" >
244
245 explicit
246
On 5/7/07, Tom Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is the "cp-lr" in snapshot really guaranteed to be atomic? Or is it just
fast, and unlikely to be interrupted?
It's called from Solr within a synchronized context, and it's
guaranteed that no index changes (via Solr at least) will happen
concurrent
does solr support date range searching? i've tried all the examples on
the lucene site as well as using the solr response format and a few
others that seemed nifty but so far I always get query parsing errors.
i know i can easily convert the dates to ints and do ranges that way but
all the documen
On 5/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1000194
http://www(r)barharborinn(r)com
Bar Harbor Hotels and Bar Harbor Inn near Acadia in Bar Harbor
ME
Bar Harbor Inn- premier oceanfront hotel in Bar
Harbor ME(r) Rated Superior First Class by OHG, Best in-town location(r)Spe
Can you use ® , instead of registered trade mark sign?
On my environment, I can post both ® and reg sign successfully, though.
Koji
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I tried CDATA. It fails the same way. I will try to check of the
utf8-example.xml works ok (I just have to change it to match my sch
Hi,
I tried CDATA. It fails the same way. I will try to check of the
utf8-example.xml works ok (I just have to change it to match my schema).
I just ran a test by adding (R) symbolt into the XML to get the exact error
message. See below.
Thanks,
Av
*** SUBMITTED REQUEST *** (as captured by HT
I'm not sure this is the case, but did you use CDATA section in your XML?
Or try to use character reference to represent copyright symbol.
I believe it is © or © .
Hope this helps,
Koji
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I run the example using Jetty on Windows 2003 machine. When I submit some
I see that the update handler fails even if the character is NOT
right next to XML closing tag. If the character is anywhere in any
of the XML tags, the update handler fails to parse the XML.
Does posting the utf8-example in the exampledocs directory work?
Hi,
I specify the following encoding when POSTING the data to Solr:
text/xml; charset=utf-8
The encoding of the actual XML is also UTF-8.
I see that the update handler fails even if the character is NOT right next to
XML closing tag. If the character is anywhere in any of the XML tags, the
up
On 5/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I run the example using Jetty on Windows 2003 machine. When I submit some
documents containing upper ASCII characters, Solr update handler fails with an
XML parsing error saying that it encountered an EOF before the closing tags.
Normall
Hi,
I run the example using Jetty on Windows 2003 machine. When I submit some
documents containing upper ASCII characters, Solr update handler fails with an
XML parsing error saying that it encountered an EOF before the closing tags.
The XML is perfectly correct and is using utf-8 encoding. It
On 5/9/07, mike topper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it possible for a date field to weigh in on the score slightly in
some way? Or if not is there another way to push up newer records in
the order of results while still maintaining the scoring?
Still under construction, but see the relevancy
Hello,
In our application there are a lot of old records that we still want in
our index but would like for them to be scored lower than some newer
records.
Is it possible for a date field to weigh in on the score slightly in
some way? Or if not is there another way to push up newer records
42 matches
Mail list logo
