Re[2]: Multiple fq fields in URL

2007-05-05 Thread Chris Hostetter
: Thanks for the reply. And sorry for sounding impatient - : I've been working in the weekend and I wasn't sure if I expressed : my question well, hence why the second email :) yeah .. my apologies as well, i realize now i didn't answer your question very well at all ... i've been sick and it's

Re[2]: Multiple fq fields in URL

2007-05-05 Thread Jack L
Hello Chris, Thanks for the reply. And sorry for sounding impatient - I've been working in the weekend and I wasn't sure if I expressed my question well, hence why the second email :) I understand I can url-encode the space. My question, which I failed to mention in my first email, is that, what

Re: Multiple fq fields in URL

2007-05-05 Thread Chris Hostetter
first off, please have a little patience when sending mai lto the mailing list ... 17 hours between "reposting" isn't relaly a lot ... especially on a weekend, when many people are out of hte country for a confrence, and i'm sick :) On to your question... : fq=+popularity:[10 TO *] +section:0 :

Re: Using fields to create new queries

2007-05-05 Thread Chris Hostetter
: when solr is processing the fields to figure out where to put the doc in the : tree, it proccesses the indexable fields and removes the stops words. This : stripped down set of keyword is passed to some other function which places : it in the correct part of the search tree. : : I would like to h

Re: Multiple fq fields in URL

2007-05-05 Thread Jack L
Could anyone please explain a bit about the line below? No spaces is allowed in a URL so I suppose this needs to be quoted, but, what if there is space in the fq value field, which will create ambiguity between fq field boundary and term boundary? fq=+popularity:[10 TO *] +section:0 > I'm not su

Re: Ideas for a relevance score that could be considered stable across multiple searches with the same query structure?

2007-05-05 Thread Sean Timm
It may not be easy or even possible without major changes, but having global collection statistics would allow scores to be compared across searchers.  To do this, the master indexes would need to be able to communicate with each other. An other approach to merging across searchers is describe

Re: Ideas for a relevance score that could be considered stable across multiple searches with the same query structure?

2007-05-05 Thread Daniel Einspanjer
On 4/11/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: A custom Similaity class with simplified tf, idf, and queryNorm functions might also help you get scores from the Explain method that are more easily manageable since you'll have predictible query structures hard coded into your application

Multiple fq fields in URL

2007-05-05 Thread Jack L
Hello , I'm not sure if I understand how to specify multiple fq in CommonQueryParameters, which is described in this page http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters It says: --- cut - fq=+popularity:[10 TO *] +section:0 is equivalent to fq=popularity:[10 TO *]&fq=section:0