We resort it in solr-ruby:
def field_facets(field)
facets = []
values = @data['facet_counts']['facet_fields'][field]
Solr::Util.paired_array_each(values) do |key, value|
facets << FacetValue.new(key, value)
end
facets
end
On May 3, 2007, at 8:10 PM, Mike Klaas wr
On 5/3/07, Ge, Yao (Y.) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am planning to develop look ahead queries with Solr so that as user
type query terms a list of related terms is shown in a popup window
(similar to Google suggest). It will be a little AJAX type calls to Solr
with wildcards. So if user types "f
On 5/3/07, Jack L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been using solr.py to post and search. It works well.
Is it possible to specify doc boost and field boost with it?
Not currently, but there is an improved client in the works which you
can try here:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-216
On 5/3/07, Jack L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Python output uses nested dictionaries for facet counts.
I read it online that Python dictionaries do not preserve order.
So when a string is eval()'d, the sorted order is lost in the
generated Python object. Is it a good idea to use list to wrap
a
Hi all,
I'm really impressed by Solr and one of my potential consulting
customers is considering installing it, using the faceted metadata
browse results for their photo site. They're running Windows and MS
SQL, and would want someone to help them install and configure Solr
for them, in Flor
The Python output uses nested dictionaries for facet counts.
I read it online that Python dictionaries do not preserve order.
So when a string is eval()'d, the sorted order is lost in the
generated Python object. Is it a good idea to use list to wrap
around the dictionary? This is only needed for t
I've been using solr.py to post and search. It works well.
Is it possible to specify doc boost and field boost with it?
Jack
Erik> There is a solr.py in the Solr clients directory:
Erik> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/trunk/client/python/solr.py
Erik> It's got some utility methods fo
: Now the expected result using phrase query after giving valid slop, should
: return back document with exact match first and then remaining documents
: that match any or few terms in the phrase. Here is the example of terms with
: # of occurrences in index is as follows
there is no single query
Great, thanks. I was hoping the solution you were suggesting was along
those lines.
Chris Hostetter wrote:
: Just to be clear, I have multiple fields per document that Are coming
: back in the queried XML. Let's say it's name, id, date, description. I
: want to sort dynamically on fields but
: the scenario, understand this that user runs a search for title which has
: pretty common terms such as "how do I update" {all of the words appears
: 1000s of times in indexes } and they want to search "prison" the last term
: appears not more than 1 or 2 times across the indexes. Now I have the
: Just to be clear, I have multiple fields per document that Are coming
: back in the queried XML. Let's say it's name, id, date, description. I
: want to sort dynamically on fields but for my test case on Description.
: Are you suggesting that there be one field defined per document, or you
: ca
Just to be clear, I have multiple fields per document that Are coming
back in the queried XML. Let's say it's name, id, date, description. I
want to sort dynamically on fields but for my test case on Description.
Are you suggesting that there be one field defined per document, or you
can only
one appraoch would be to have a single field called "citation" and use a
custom Analyzer that will put a "medium" sized gap between a persons name
and their organization, and a "large" gap between each person ... so
citation:"John ACME"~10 will give you articles by people named John who
work for c
: having issues with it. Some fields work some do not and my results seem
: to suggest that it doesn't work when there are any non-alphaNumeric
: values in the fields. Can someone out there either confirm this or let
: me know what I may be doing wrong? is it a matter of using a different
: ana
I've been attempting to utilize Solr 1.1's sorting feature using the
Syntax provided on the wiki [q=; (asc|desc)] but I'm
having issues with it. Some fields work some do not and my results seem
to suggest that it doesn't work when there are any non-alphaNumeric
values in the fields. Can so
On 5/3/07, Brian Whitman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On May 3, 2007, at 11:39 AM, Jack L wrote:
> Snippet generation use hl.fragsize to determine the size
> of the snippets. This works very well. However, the snippets
> often have half of a sentence at the beginning, and half
> at the end. Is ther
Hi Everyone,
Question on phrase query. Does the phrase query will return only the
documents with all terms matched in the document?
To better illustrate there is a phrase query say "How do I look for supply".
Now the expected result using phrase query after giving valid slop, should
return back d
Thanks. Looking forward to it!
> We are working on this and hope to have a solr patch soon. Doing
> simple splitting on punctuation is a new fragmenter, which trunk solr
> does not support yet. But we're hoping to fix that asap.
> -brian
A agree that multi-word synonyms are an excellent way to do this.
This may sound like a hack, but you'd end up doing this even if
you had dedicated linguistic compound decomposition software.
Those usually use a dictionary of common words and the dictionary
rarely has all the words that are import
In additional to snapshot, you can also make backup copies of your Solr
index using the backup script.
Backup are created the same way as snapshots using hard links. Each one is
a viable full index.
Bill
On 5/3/07, Charlie Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a couple of questions regard
I have a couple of questions regarding index corruptions.
1) Has anyone using Solr in a production environment ever experienced an
index corruption? If so, how frequently do they occur?
2) It seems like the CollectionDistribution setup would be a good way to
put in place a recovery plan fo
On May 3, 2007, at 11:39 AM, Jack L wrote:
Snippet generation use hl.fragsize to determine the size
of the snippets. This works very well. However, the snippets
often have half of a sentence at the beginning, and half
at the end. Is there a parameter I can use to tell the
snippet generation code
Snippet generation use hl.fragsize to determine the size
of the snippets. This works very well. However, the snippets
often have half of a sentence at the beginning, and half
at the end. Is there a parameter I can use to tell the
snippet generation code to cut at punctuation marks when
possible?
-
Hello all,
I am trying to reuse fields to create new search queries.
Let me explain
when solr is processing the fields to figure out where to put the doc in the
tree, it proccesses the indexable fields and removes the stops words. This
stripped down set of keyword is passed to some other functio
I am planning to develop look ahead queries with Solr so that as user
type query terms a list of related terms is shown in a popup window
(similar to Google suggest). It will be a little AJAX type calls to Solr
with wildcards. So if user types "fuel", a look ahead query will be sent
to solr in form
damn, there goes the platform independance ...
is there anybody with a lillte more experience when it comes to collection
distribution on Windows ?
tnx in advance !
"Bill Au" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
02/05/2007 15:09
Please respond to
solr-user@lucene.apache.org
To
solr-user@lucene.apache.org
26 matches
Mail list logo
